Center for Public Integrity
Investigating Inequality
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Founded in 1989 by veteran journalist Charles Lewis, the Center for Public Integrity is one of the oldest and largest nonprofit news organizations in the country. Our Pulitzer Prize-winning newsroom is comprised of reporters, editors and data journalists who dig deep and deliver national and international investigative journalism of enduring significance.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Federal Politics
What happens when you follow the money? We dig deep to reveal what drives power and influence in the U.S.
Environment and Climate
Harm to the environment has a vastly unequal impact on Americans depending on the color of their skin and how much money they have. Both climate change and toxic pollution are compounding the consequences of discriminatory housing, labor, and economic policies. Public Integrity’s investigative reporting confronts this type of inequality and illuminates the impact of efforts to address i
Immigration
You hear the opinions on immigration, but we bring you the facts, faces and context behind immigration policy in the U.S. and its implications.
State Politics
Who’s calling the shots in your state? We uncover what drives decisions in statehouses across the U.S., and monitor lawmaker ethics and accountability.
Workers' Rights
How safe are America’s workers? We reveal the hazards employees face in their workplaces, and the protections that often fail them.
Education
Education in the United States can be vastly unequal depending on who a student is and where they live. Our investigative journalists bring a diverse set of lived experiences and to report with and in service to the people most affected by our work. We use data-driven accountability reporting to expose discriminatory systems affecting public education and to bring attention to solutions, frequently through collaboration with local journalists.
Where we work
Awards
The Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting, 2013
The Pulitzer Prizes
Edgar A. Poe Award 2013
White House Correspondents' Association
The Harvard Goldsmith Prize for Investigative Reporting 2013
Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government
Investigative Reporting in a Medium Newsroom, First Place 2012
National Awards for Education Reporting
Thomas Stokes Award for Energy Reporting 2012
National Press Foundation
Winner, Feature Reporting Internet 2011
New York Press Foundation
James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism 2011
James Aronson Award
Excellence in Financial Journalism - Consumer Category - News 2011
New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants
Edward R Murrow Award for Overall Excellence 2023
Edward R Murrow Award
Best Beat Coverage 2022
National Headliner Award
Excellence in Financial Journalism 2020
Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA)
Dateline Award 2019
The Society of Professional Journalist
Crisis Coverage Award 2022
American Socieity of Journalists and Authors (ASJA)
Investigative Reporting 2020
Goldsmith Prize
Best Collaborative Investigative 2019
EPPY Award
Salute to Excellence Award 2023
National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ)
Excellence 2023
Financial Journalist Award
Photos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of stories successfully placed in the media
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of overall donors
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of issue mentions in policymaker speeches
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Another media outlet or a policymaker mentions or cites one of our investigations in their publication and/or public speeches.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
The Center for Public Integrity measures our impact using a variety of quantitative and qualitative assessments. These include web statistics, press citations, journalism awards, and references in congressional hearings and testimony. By facilitating regular and strategic interaction with peer and partner organizations (through regular meetings and other outreach) and with our audiences (through social networking technology, e-mail campaigns, surveys, conference calls, and other activities), we provide for more continuous feedback on the relevance and helpfulness of our work as well as a means to monitor the way advocates, citizens, and policymakers use it to promote social change.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The Center for Public Integrity measures our impact using a variety of quantitative and qualitative assessments. These include web statistics, press citations, journalism awards, and references in congressional hearings and testimony. By facilitating regular and strategic interaction with peer and partner organizations (through regular meetings and other outreach) and with our audiences (through social networking technology, e-mail campaigns, surveys, conference calls, and other activities), we provide for more continuous feedback on the relevance and helpfulness of our work as well as a means to monitor the way advocates, citizens, and policymakers use it to promote social change.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
The Center for Public Integrity measures our impact using a variety of quantitative and qualitative assessments. These include web statistics, press citations, journalism awards, and references in congressional hearings and testimony. By facilitating regular and strategic interaction with peer and partner organizations (through regular meetings and other outreach) and with our audiences (through social networking technology, e-mail campaigns, surveys, conference calls, and other activities), we provide for more continuous feedback on the relevance and helpfulness of our work as well as a means to monitor the way advocates, citizens, and policymakers use it to promote social change.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
The Center focuses its investigations on the following areas: money and politics, government waste/fraud/abuse, the environment, workers' rights, national security, immigration, and business. We have won more than 50 major journalism awards, including the George Polk Award and numerous honors from the Investigative Reporters and Editors, the Online News Association, Overseas Press Club, Society of Environmental Journalists and the Society of Professional Journalists.
2018
Wireless Wars: The Fight Over 5G
Reported by Allan Holmes. Edited by Gordon Witkin.
Editor & Publisher EPPY Awards, Best Business Reporting with under 1 million unique monthly visitors
Swamp Watch
Reported by Dave Levinthal, Sarah Kleiner, Carrie Levine, Ashley Balcerzak, Ryan Barwick, Lateshia Beachum, Jared Bennett, Fatima Bhojani, John Dunbar, Susan Ferriss, Allan Holmes, Maryam Jameel, Rui Kaneya, Rachel Leven, Kristen Lombardi, Patrick Malone, Jim Morris, R. Jeffrey Smith, Jamie Smith Hopkins, Kytja Weir and Jie Jenny Zou. Designed by Chris Zubak-Skees and Sameea Kamal. Edited by Levinthal, Dunbar and Gordon Witkin.
Editor & Publisher EPPY Awards, Best News/Political Blog with under 1 million unique monthly visitors
Medicaid, Under the Influence
Reported by Liz Essley Whyte and Joe Yerardi from the Center for Public Integrity and Alison Fitzgerald Kodjak from NPR. Graphics by Julia Donheiser. Edited by the Center’s Kytja Weir and Chris Zubak-Skees and NPR’s Joe Neel, Scott Hensley and Meredith Rizzo.
Editor & Publisher EPPY Awards, Best Collaborative Investigative/Enterprise Feature with 1 million unique monthly visitors and over — Finalist
2017
Nuclear Negligence
Reported by Peter Cary, Patrick Malone and R. Jeffrey Smith. Designed by Chris Zubak-Skees. Edited by Smith.
National Headliner Award, Online Investigative Reporting
Associated Press Media Editors Awards, Public Service (medium newsroom)
Associated Press Media Editors Awards, Investigative Reporting (small newsroom)
Editor & Publisher EPPY Awards, Best News or Event Feature with under 1 million unique monthly visitors
Society of News Design Award of Excellence, Best of Digital Design, Features: Single subject project category
Online News Association Online Journalism Awards, Explanatory Reporting (Small) — Finalist
Gerald R. Ford Journalism Prize for Distinguished Reporting on National Defense — Honorable mention
Society of American Business Editors and Writers Health/Science Award (Small) — Finalist
Society of Professional Journalists D.C. Pro Chapter, Dateline Award, Investigative — Finalist
#CitizenSleuth
Reported and produced by Dave Levinthal, Christina Wilkie, Carrie Levine and Chris Zubak-Skees from the Center for Public Integrity and Amy Walters of Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting.
National Headliner Award, Social Media
Editor & Publisher EPPY Awards, Best Use of Social Media/Crowd Sourcing with under 1 million unique monthly visitors
Edward R. Murrow Award for Excellence in S
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Center for Public Integrity
Board of directorsas of 11/09/2023
James Kiernan
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Paul Cheung
Center for Public Integrity
Bruce Finzen
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi
Gilbert Omenn
Center for Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics and the Proteomics Alliance for Cancer Research at the University of Michigan
James A Kiernan
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Jennifer 8. Lee
Plympton
Richard Lobo
The Kennedy Center
Amit Paley
McKinsey & Company
George Alvarez-Correa
The World Bank
Jamal Glen
JG Holdings
Olivier Kamanda
Wesley Lowery
Investigative Reporting Workshop
Sue Suh
TIME
Daniel Suleiman
Covington & Burling, LLP
Andres Torres
Robert R McCormick Foundation
Charles Whitaker
Medill School of Journalism
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 11/08/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.