GOLD2023

STEM ADVOCACY INSTITUTE

A non-profit incubator for science engagement initiatives

aka SAi Collective   |   Boston, MA   |  https://stemadvocacy.org

Mission

The SAi Collective is an incubator that provides support to emerging scholars and social entrepreneurs who are building the next generation of science engagement initiatives and tools that connect people to science.

Ruling year info

2018

Founder and Chief Executive Officer

Fanuel Muindi

Chief Operating Officer

Claire Holesovsky

Main address

6 Liberty Square PMB #255

Boston, MA 02109 USA

Show more contact info

EIN

82-3902027

NTEE code info

Science, General (includes Interdisciplinary Scientific Activities) (U20)

Alliance/Advocacy Organizations (W01)

IRS filing requirement

This organization is required to file an IRS Form 990 or 990-EZ.

Sign in or create an account to view Form(s) 990 for 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Register now

Communication

Blog

Programs and results

What we aim to solve

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Around the world, new scholars and social entrepreneurs working to make science more accessible are struggling to move their work forward due to lack of funding, infrastructure, mentorship, partnerships, professional development, and so much more. The nature of the problems they both face and are tackling are multi-faceted. Although progress is occurring, more must be done around the world.

Our programs

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?

SAI Fellows Program

Our SAi Fellows Program seeks to provide mentorship and funding to those with novel early stage ideas which aim to build or strengthen bridges between science and society. Fellows receive the theory, design, implementation, and evaluation knowledge-base to enable them to build impactful and sustainable initiatives. Fellows also receive professional development support. We especially welcome outside-the-box ideas that utilize new and creative ways to engage communities that have been traditionally underrepresented and underserved.

Population(s) Served
Researchers
Teachers
Artists and performers
Activists

Launched in June 2020, the SAi Summer Internship Program (SSIP) seeks to provide undergraduate students from around the world with the opportunity to get hands on experience in the fields of public science engagement and informal science education through special projects designed by SAi Residents. Interns are matched with one of the SAi Residents/Staff along expertise, interests, and other domains. The interns then work closely with the residents/staff on those special projects that include conducting landscape analyses, designing new research proposals (see examples below), collecting/analyzing data, helping launch new initiatives, and so much more. https://stemadvocacy.org/summer-intern-program/

Population(s) Served
Students

SAi Residents are independent researcher investigators and founders working to develop new informal science education, science communication, and science public engagement tools, programs, and scholarship. Residents are challenged to collaborate, combine disparate ideas, and question each other’s approaches. Residents are given access to SAi’s resources, community, and empowered to experiment, explore, and build. Throughout the year, residents are expected to be active participants and contribute meaningfully to the SAi community.

Population(s) Served

Where we work

Awards

Most Inclusive STEM Support Institute 2021

Acquisition International Magazine

Our results

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.

Total dollars received in contributions

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Increasing

Context Notes

Total revenue from all sources across each fiscal year (July 1-June 30)

Number of grants received

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Holding steady

Number of website pageviews

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Context Notes

Number of total Page views of our main website from Google Analytics across fiscal years (July 1-June 30)

Our Sustainable Development Goals

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.

Goals & Strategy

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.

Charting impact

Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.

The Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Advocacy Institute (also known as the Science Advocacy Institute or SAi) is an incubator that provides access to research, infrastructure, mentorship, community, training, and funding to, put simply, make it easier for new scholars and social entrepreneurs to study, experiment, explore and ultimately build the next generation of programs and tools in public science engagement, science communication, and informal science learning.

Goal 1: Provide top notch support to SAi staff, residents, fellows, interns and alumni.
Metric: Number of internal programming/workshop/tools available for residents to enhance their professional and program development.
E.g., grant writing, DEI training, evaluation, data analysis, library
Metric: Availability of internal seed funding for residents to support their projects.
Metric: Number of core staff to support residents in developing their projects.
Metric: Number of grants awarded to residents that are housed at SAi.

Goal 2: Expand and promote excellence in scholarship and social entrepreneurship
Metric: Number of articles submitted and published by residents
Metric: Number of programs/tools being used by external organizations.
Metric: Event/course/workshop attendance rate and overall feedback.
Metric: Number of individuals that the resident and fellow projects engage each year.
Metric: Follow-on funding for projects launched by fellows.

Goal 3: Invest in organizational capacity and infrastructure (technology, finance, communication, fundraising, sponsorships, partnerships, consulting etc).
Metric: Number of grants submitted and awarded for core programs.
Metric: Number of individual donors.
Metric: Number of paying advising clients.
Metric: Expansion of the endowment and yearly payout
Metric: Expansion of available unrestricted funding.
Metric: Level of integration of apps to coordinate all SAi operations.

Goal 4: Broaden SAi’s exposure and voice nationally and internationally.
Metric: Number of resident invitations to present at conferences/workshops etc.
Metrics: Number of followers and views online via social media/youtube etc. .

Convening Power: Our ability to convene people continues to grow with each new staff member (research fellows, program specialists, principal investigators) we bring in. This is an important ability in that it gives us access to new ideas which we share widely with the public.

Advocacy: We routinely publish letters, reports, and perspectives in high impact journals (e.g., Science, Nature). Such publications allow to increase the exposure of our ideas around the world.

Development: We continue to develop new tools that can be used by educators across the pipeline. Our team is composed of people with expertise in podcasting, web development, and editing.

Advising: Using our collective experience in science (scientists, science communicators, etc), we serve as a resource for organizations and initiatives looking for feedback on their specific initiatives.

Our organization's approach is opposite to what most traditional incubators do. We use the fellows program as an opportunity to identify founders who can join the institute for a longer term (1-2 yrs) where they serve as resident founders. The program serves as a pipeline so to speak and most are selected to join SAi from each fellow cohort. As residents, they can apply for internal/external grants, take courses, attend seminars, collaborate with other residents, and get support from our staff to further grow their initiatives.

We get an average of 30-40 applicants each year for our fellows and summer internship programs. We currently have over 25 active members at the institute.

How we listen

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.

done We demonstrated a willingness to learn more by reviewing resources about feedback practice.
done We shared information about our current feedback practices.
  • How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?

    To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve

  • Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?

    We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback

  • What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?

    We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback

Financials

STEM ADVOCACY INSTITUTE
lock

Unlock financial insights by subscribing to our monthly plan.

Subscribe

Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more about GuideStar Pro.

Operations

The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.

lock

Connect with nonprofit leaders

Subscribe

Build relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.

lock

Connect with nonprofit leaders

Subscribe

Build relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.

STEM ADVOCACY INSTITUTE

Board of directors
as of 04/24/2023
SOURCE: Self-reported by organization
Board chair

Nathan Vanderford

University of Kentucky

Term: 2017 - 2023

Nathan Vanderford, MBA., PhD

University of Kentucky

Jessica W. Tsai, MD., PhD

Boston Children's Hospital

Joseph Keller, PhD

American Psychological Association

Board leadership practices

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.

  • Board orientation and education
    Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes
  • CEO oversight
    Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No
  • Board composition
    Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes
  • Board performance
    Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Not applicable

Organizational demographics

SOURCE: Self-reported; last updated 9/30/2022

Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.

Leadership

The organization's leader identifies as:

Race & ethnicity
Black/African American
Gender identity
Male, Not transgender
Disability status
Person without a disability

The organization's co-leader identifies as:

Gender identity
Female

Race & ethnicity

Gender identity

Transgender Identity

Sexual orientation

No data

Disability

No data

Equity strategies

Last updated: 08/01/2020

GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more

Data
  • We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
  • We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
  • We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
  • We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
Policies and processes
  • We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
  • We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
  • We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.