SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY OVERSIGHT PROJECT INC
We Watch The Watchers
Learn how to support this organization
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
The history of discriminatory surveillance in America is older than the United States itself. In the 18th century, New York’s first surveillance law required Black and Indigenous people to carry lanterns with them. Twenty-first century surveillance is deeply rooted in legacies of slavery and exclusion. Today, it has never been easier to monitor millions at once or to pinpoint an individual. Spy tools like facial recognition pose an unprecedented threat, yet police continue to use them with little or no civilian oversight. While debates over the USA PATRIOT Act dragged on for decades, local police quietly buy new and untested technologies, spy on protests and mosques, share data with ICE, and put lives at risk. America’s privacy debate is not new, but it has taken on new urgency. We are at an inflection point: if we fail to fundamentally reshape how America defines and defends privacy in the coming years, we will be locked into a dystopian future from which there is no return.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Litigation
S.T.O.P. serves survivors of surveillance abuse through impact litigation, and sues government agencies and their vendors both to end surveillance abuses and to reveal records to the public. Our virtual law firm model pairs our staff with the country's top law firms.
In court, we forced the NYPD to end its “hijab ban” policy, which required arrestees to remove head coverings for mugshots and fueled its facial recognition database. Most recently, S.T.O.P. represents Amnesty International, a leading human rights organization, in litigation to compel the NYPD to disclose surveillance records from 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.
Legislation
S.T.O.P. wants our laws to reflect our progressive values. We drafted the country’s first ban on “reverse search warrants,” which allow police to track thousands of individuals with a single warrant.
Education
STOP empowers communities targeted by discriminatory surveillance. Our community education program designs custom privacy trainings driven by the needs of communities, partnering with trusted messengers to deliver the trainings. By moving away from a one-size-fits-none approach and focusing on communities’ most urgent needs, we address the need for equity in privacy advocacy.
Advocacy
STOP harnesses the media to hold the powerful accountable and amplify our clients’ stories. Our interviews, op-eds, and legislative testimony explain how to end surveillance abuse. Our campaigns push long-overdue reforms and cutting-edge innovations.
Where we work
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of list subscribers
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Ethnic and racial groups, LGBTQ people, Victims and oppressed people, At-risk youth
Related Program
Advocacy
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of testimonies offered
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Ethnic and racial groups, LGBTQ people, At-risk youth, Victims and oppressed people
Related Program
Advocacy
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of stories successfully placed in the media
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Ethnic and racial groups, LGBTQ people, Victims and oppressed people, At-risk youth
Related Program
Advocacy
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Number of press releases developed and distributed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Ethnic and racial groups, LGBTQ people, At-risk youth, Victims and oppressed people
Related Program
Advocacy
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
S.T.O.P. launched in 2019 as a novel public interest, advocacy, and legal services organization. The Urban Justice Center hosts S.T.O.P. as one of five organizations in UJC’s 2019-2020 Social Justice Accelerator incubator. Our team uses litigation, legislation, education, and grass roots advocacy to fundamentally shift New Yorkers’ understanding of surveillance.
Our virtual law firm model leverages the pro bono assistance of private law firms to exponentially augment our staff’s litigation capacity. We already partner with more than a dozen of New York City’s leading law firms, including Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP; Shearman & Sterling, LLP; and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP. Our litigation agenda is nothing short of fundamentally redefining the scope of the Fourth amendments for the digital age. By the end of 10 years, we hope to establish a state constitutional right against warrantless searches that extends to third-party data (such as location data held by service providers).
S.T.O.P. is coordinating city and state-wide legislative campaigns, pushing long overdue reforms of surveillance. Our lead bill is the Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology (POST) Act, which would close the appropriations loophole that lets the NYPD purchase unlimited surveillance equipment with federal grants and private donations. The POST Act is just the first step in a legislative agenda. At the end of 10 years, we will create legislative best practices for existing and emerging technologies, transforming New York into a model of surveillance oversight for the country.
Our Digital Self-Defense curriculum educates New Yorkers about the scope of local surveillance and how they can safeguard their privacy. Our workshops not only educate impacted communities about the scope of surveillance, but teach them how to use freely-available tools to promote privacy. These workshops, often held in conjunction with partner community-based organizations, also enable us to document community members’ reports about surveillance abuse. Our 10-year goal is to scale-up our course offerings, providing a comprehensive surveillance education curriculum.
Our advocacy work includes a mix of media engagement and non-violent direct actions. We educate reporters on breaking news about surveillance, helping broaden coverage. We strategically place op-eds and stories to shape the narrative around privacy. We engage in highly-visible protest tactics, such as “spy-ins”, where participants turn their cameras on law enforcement agencies. In 10 years, we want to transform local and state surveillance from a relatively-obscure topic into something as common as complaining about the subway.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
In phase one, S.T.O.P will use our novel model to replicate privacy-protective legislation and court decisions from around the country. Since New York has fallen so far behind peer cities (and even progressive states) in addressing the adverse impact of privacy, we have a number of reforms we can quickly adapt and adopt here. In phase two, we will expand our work to make New York an early adopter of rights-protective measures. We will also shift our focus to include greater emphasis on state-wide reforms and New York localities apart from New York City.
In phase three, we will shift even more of our focus to statewide campaigns, while working to develop statutory proposals and litigation strategies that go further than anywhere else in the country. In phase four, we will expand our focus to also address technical support and guidance for community-based groups across the country. In short: first we make New York a model of privacy protections, and then we help the rest of the country replicate our success.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
S.T.O.P. shows an unprecedented ability to leverage the private bar and existing stakeholders to amplify our impact. In a few months, we’ve successfully created a platform to provide more than a million dollars in free legal services and promote numerous advocacy and legislative campaigns (consistent with all local, state, and federal limitations on lobbying by a 501(C)(3) tax-exempt organization).
Because of the technical and legal barriers to entry, local advocacy groups often deprioritize surveillance and privacy campaigns. Many organizations focus on local surveillance as a small part of their mission, but S.T.O.P. uniquely focuses on state and municipal surveillance as the entirety of our work. This has quickly made S.T.O.P a leader in the New York privacy debate, creating a model we can replicate in other localities in the future.
As a corollary, because many organizations are aligned with S.T.O.P.’s privacy objectives, we amplify our impact through intersectional policy coalitions, reaching a broader audience than any one organization could alone. Our community advisory board includes members of many of the leading organization working on surveillance in New York, and our partnerships with other community-based organizations helps us reach segments of New York that are not yet engaged with these issues.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
S.T.O.P.’s accomplishments prove that our model works. In 2020, we led 100 organizations to enact New York’s Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology Act – the first NYPD surveillance reform in a generation – forcing the NYPD to disclose every spy tool it uses. We also passed a statewide moratorium on K-12 facial recognition and the strongest privacy protections for COVID-19 contact tracing data in the country.
In court, we forced the NYPD to end its biased “hijab ban” policy, which required arrestees to remove head coverings for mugshots and fueled its facial recognition database. In California, S.T.O.P. brought a putative class action lawsuit alleging Thomson Reuters illegally sold personally identifying data to private companies, police, and ICE. Recently, S.T.O.P. won our motion to dismiss, establishing a powerful precedent for future cases and chill investment in deadly data-driven policing.
Our open records litigation and research empower the public to understand complex surveillance systems and regulations. We have published dozens of research papers and posts on topics ranging from warrantless cellphone seizures to congestion pricing. Our more than 100 op-eds have made us an international thought leader on privacy, technology, and law, addressing crucial issues of the day.
S.T.O.P.’s partnerships further amplify our impact, providing nearly $5 million in free legal services and campaigning on issues that previously received little public attention. We provide support and technical assistance to partners far beyond New York, including New Jersey, New Delhi, and countless places in between.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY OVERSIGHT PROJECT INC
Board of directorsas of 02/02/2024
Nigar Shaikh
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Sami Rashid
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Lauren Wu
Regulatory & Compliance for Evidation Health
Samantha Van Doran
Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project
Jenny Lee
Strong Arm Technologies, Inc.
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? No -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 08/02/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.