THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Collections
Foundation funding allows The Seattle Public Library to expand the depth and breadth of its collection, as well as act more responsively to community needs, interests, and demands. By providing convenient access to a wide range of books, media, and informational materials, the Library fosters literacy, engagement, opportunity, and achievement. Last year, SPLF funds were used to acquire approximately one in four books purchased by the Library.
Where we work
External reviews

Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of endowments
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Collections
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Total dollar amount of grants awarded
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Collections
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Total number of grants awarded
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Collections
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
The Library serves and incredibly broad audience including patrons of all ages and all backgrounds. However, it prioritizes how it uses Foundation funding to support programs and services that serve people facing the greatest barriers to accessing Library resources, as well as elevating voices that have been traditionally marginalized or underrepresented. Using data to drive decisions, the Library prioritizes where it delivers programs based on community need, race, and social justice goals. Equity is centered in all decision making.
-
How is your organization collecting feedback from the people you serve?
Electronic surveys (by email, tablet, etc.), Paper surveys, Focus groups or interviews (by phone or in person), Case management notes, Community meetings/Town halls, Constituent (client or resident, etc.) advisory committees, Suggestion box/email,
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals,
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
The Library’s digital media program was using virtual reality as a way to engage teens from a college program focused on developing tech interest with minority students. When COVID struck, community partners were concerned about the mental health of students and teens in isolated environments. Recognizing this need, the program shifted its focus from working with students on virtual reality projects that focused on social justice projects, to focusing on creating mental health awareness using similar tools to other VR projects. As work progressed, it was also made clear that teens were seeking a physical space, so the Library launched an effort to help Librarians support teen mental health across its physical environments. SPL has obtained two IMLS grants to advance this work nationally.
-
With whom is the organization sharing feedback?
The people we serve, Our staff, Our board, Our funders, Our community partners,
-
How has asking for feedback from the people you serve changed your relationship?
Library programming decisions are made in partnership with community partners. It is listed in our guidelines that, whenever possible, community partners must be engaged. We’ve invested heavily to build long-term sustainable relationships with partners, and often we rely on them to carry out programs. For example, we created a community curator program for our author series that engages BIPOC and LGBTQIA+ curators. Curators from the community are given complete discretion over planning, programming, and activities within a defined budget scope. Decision making in this program shifted to the curators representing communities not always engaged in or represented by Library programming.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback,
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time, It is hard to come up with good questions to ask people, Privacy in a public library setting is fundamental value that we do not compromise.,
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
Board of directorsas of 09/20/2022
Justo González
Stokes Lawrence, P.S.
Term: 2022 - 2024
Tyler Preston Mickey
Moss Adams
Catherine Irby Arnold
US Bank Private Wealth Management
Grace Nordhoff
Community Volunteer
Gene J. Chang
Himalaya Capital
Morgan Collins
Microsoft
Lauren Dudley
Trial and Error Productions
Sibyl Frankenburg
University of Washington
Sharon Hammel
Community Volunteer
Margaret Inouye
K&L Gates
Jon Jurich
Pacifica Law Group LLP
Sarah Kohut
Synergy One Lending
Ellen Look
Community Volunteer
Ruth Massigna
Community Volunteer
Courtney McKlveen
Convoy, Inc.
Nick Momyer
Whittier Trust
Brittney Moraski
Starbucks
Susan Potts
Community Volunteer
Anne Repass
Community Volunteer
Claudia Skelton
Community Volunteer
Jennifer Southwell
Karass Creative
Bill Stafford
Community Volunteer
Sarah Stanley
Community Volunteer
David Strauss
SHKS Architects
Michele Turner
Expedia Group
Julie Zunker
Microsoft
Stephanie Axelrod
Community Volunteer
Jeanette Flory
Cereus Asset Services LLC
Florence Larson
Deloitte
Andrés Paguaga
Union Bank
Raj Rakhra
Community Volunteer
Haeryung Shin
North Hill Law Advisory, LLC
Maria Valente
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Sam Howe Verhovek
Author/Reporter
Patricia Walker
Community Volunteer
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Not applicable
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
We do not display disability information for organizations with fewer than 15 staff.
Equity strategies
Last updated: 09/01/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.