Provide, Inc.
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Because comprehensive skills and information about abortion care are often left out of pregnancy-related training for many professionals, Provide's ART program fills this gap with trainings, tools, and resources to equip care providers for these nuanced discussions with clients and patients.
Beyond the basics of providing high-quality pregnancy options counseling, our training gives providers the best language, practices, and tools to counsel clients considering abortion, and offers insight into managing these conversations, including the conflict that providers face when personal values conflict with professional ethics.
Web-Based Programs
Using ART curriculum, we developed shorter webinars to train and educate care providers on specific topics of stigmatized care and abortion access. Topics include supporting trans and non-binary clients, fat clients, and LGBTQ+ clients. We also provide trainings that illuminate hidden barriers to care, self-managed abortion and the law, as well as identifying racial disparities in reproductive healthcare.
Where we work
Accreditations
Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance 2013
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of sites trained
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
The large reduction from 2018 to 2019 was the result of a large Anonymous donor sunsetting their giving. In 2019, our staff reduced by nearly 50%; thus, reducing the number of sites we could train.
Number of people trained
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Similarly, number of participants reduced after a large donor sunset giving, reducing our staff size. And, COVID reduced the number of people we reached, because we stopped in-person training.
Percentage of training participants satisfied with the training
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of sites receiving technical assistance
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
With staff turnover due the pandemic and lost of funding, our TA reduced. In 2021, we hired a full-time TA manager to oversee this area of work to continue building more impact.
Percentage of training participants who shared what they learned with others
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Percentage of participants who had not previously referred for abortion that planned to refer for abortion after the training
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
In 2023, this number is lower partially because 67% of people said they would refer at pre-test, so there would be no change for them
Percentage of participants who initially believed abortion to be unsafe that changed their view after the training
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
For 2023, this is because 80% thought it was safe at pre-test.
Number of trainings held
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Due to COVID restrictions and healthcare workers being overwhelmed, the number of trainings reduced in 2020 and 2021. In 2022, with an increased online presence, we held a record number of trainings!
Number of sites who have made site-level change to better support abortion referral
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Increased percentage of participant's intent to change and refer for abortion if client requests it.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Percentage of participant's that report having the skills and knowledge needed to refer clients to abortion services or resources.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Abortion Referrals Training (ART)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planHow we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals, To help agencies we partner with achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We share feedback with our partners
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Provide, Inc.
Board of directorsas of 03/06/2024
Jamarr Brown
Color of Change PAC
Jamarr Brown
Color of Change PAC
Bridget Bohannon
Sarah Lawrence College
Dione Friends
Vision First
Molly Quinn
OUTMemphis
Amanda Oppenheimer
Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York
Cheryl Prelow
Strategic and operational consultant
Adrienne Weil
American Hotel & Lodging Association
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 06/27/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.