National Association of Scholars
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
NAS is concerned with issues, including academic content, cost, unfairness, academic integrity, campus culture, attitudes, governance, and long-term trends. We encourage commitment to high intellectual standards, individual merit, institutional integrity, good governance, and sound public policy.
We believe that intellectual freedom and the pursuit of truth are fundamental values for higher education, and we want higher education to once again become a place that prioritizes these values.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Academic Questions
From our national headquarters in New York, NAS sponsors a network of 47 state affiliates, and publishes Academic Questions, a quarterly journal, and NAS Update, our regular newsletter. Our major research projects are conducted from our New York office as well. We also hold periodic regional conferences devoted to timely issues in contemporary higher education.
Defending Academic Freedom
NAS defends professors and scholars facing challenges to academic freedom.
Where we work
External reviews

Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of rallies/events/conferences/lectures held to further mission
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Academics
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
NAS hosts conferences, lectures, and events to promote our work and draw attention to critical topics in higher education.
Number of reports written/published
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Academics
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
NAS produces richly detailed, deeply researched reports on issues of contemporary importance in highere education. These reports set the tone for reform across higher education.
Total number of organization members
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Academics
Type of Metric
Other - describing something else
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
NAS is a membership organization. Our members are the committed, involved supporters who help push our work forward.
Number of professors defended
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Academics
Related Program
Defending Academic Freedom
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
A core part of NAS's work is defending professors who face challenges to their academic freedom. We marshall our resources to promote their cases and defend their right to speak and work.
Number of unique website visitors
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Academics
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Visitors to NAS's website view and engage with our content and work, furthering NAS's goal to promote a robust dialogue on critical issues in the academy.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
NAS was founded to confront the rise of campus political correctness.
We expect colleges to offer coherent curricula and programs of study. We uphold a view of institutional integrity that includes financial probity as well as transparency in the curriculum and classroom. We uphold the principles of academic freedom that include faculty members' and students' freedom to pursue academic research; their freedom to question and to think for themselves; and their freedom from ideological imposition.
We expect colleges and universities to prioritize education as academia's main purpose. And we understand education in our time and place to entail providing students with breadth of understanding of core subjects including Western civilization and American history. We recognize that the vitality of American education arises in large part out of the freedom of colleges and universities to experiment and to offer diverse curricula. That robust diversity, however, must be anchored in respect.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The NAS advocates for excellence by encouraging commitment to high intellectual standards, individual merit, institutional integrity, good governance, and sound public policy.
INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS
Ideas judged on their merits
Disinterested pursuit of truth
Fair and judicial examination of contending views
Rich and challenging reading assignments
Frequent and carefully assessed writing assignments
Well-rounded core requirements
Transmission of both the core content and core values of Western civilization
Rigorous and fair testing and examination
Coherent curricula within majors and programs of study
INDIVIDUAL MERIT
Individuals judged fairly, according to their abilities and accomplishments
Grades consonant with accomplishment
INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY
Thrift, faithful stewardship of gifts, and financial probity
Transparency in the curriculum and classroom
Scientific spirit in scholarly inquiry
Freedom of faculty members and students to pursue academic research
Freedom of faculty members to teach their academic subjects
Freedom of students to question and to think for themselves
Freedom from ideological imposition or suppression
Conservation of knowledge and intellectual achievement
GOOD GOVERNANCE
Leadership focused on academic mission
Appointment of officers and staff members who are genuinely qualified
Efficient organization
Transparent rules and procedures
Adherence to the rule of law
Restraint in response to fashionable movements and political, social, and ideological enthusiasms
Mindfulness of the history of higher education, the ethos of scholarship, and value of knowledge and free inquiry
Capacity and willingness to distinguish between the significant and the trivial
Commitment to civil debate and respect for dissenting opinions
SOUND PUBLIC POLICY
Prioritizing education as academia's main purpose
Minimal student indebtedness
Equal opportunity on the basis of individual merit
Access to college for all
Alternatives to college made available
Greater price competition among colleges and universities
Support for affordable tuition
Support for innovation and the creation of new colleges
Support for the developing market for online college degrees and vocational training
One set of standards applied to for-profit and not-for-profit institutions
Academic programs aligned with U.S. national interests
Funding for basic research
Reform of K-12 education
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
JOURNAL
We publish a quarterly journal, Academic Questions, which explores the vices and virtues of the contemporary university. Issues are often themed and include scholarly articles, book reviews, poetry, and items of academic interest. A subscription to Academic Questions is included in NAS membership. Read More
REPORTS
We regularly publish studies that examine curricula and other aspects of higher education policy and practice. These studies document trends in contemporary academia. They aim to stimulate improvements to the quality of education in our colleges and universities.
COMMENTARY
NAS's website presents daily opinion and commentary on developments and trends in higher education. A high-traffic destination linked by major online publications, NAS.org publishes substantial op-ed style articles by guest authors and NAS staff, along with debates and videos.
ADVOCACY
NAS and our members are involved in efforts to pass legislation for true and salutary higher education reform. We file friend-of-the-court briefs in legal cases, defending freedom of speech and conscience, and the civil rights of educators and students. We give testimony before congressional and legislative committees and engage public support for worthy reforms. We defend academics and scholars facing challenges to their academic freedom.
MEETINGS
NAS holds national and regional meetings that focus on important issues and public policy debates in higher education today. At these meetings and conferences, those concerned about higher education convene to discuss issues of the moment, propose reforms, and recognize individual achievements.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Recent accomplishments include:
Accomplishment #1
Sen. Marco Rubio cited Outsourced to China, NAS's April 2017 report on Confucius Institutes and China's use of soft power at American universities, in a letter urging Florida Confucius Institutes to close. NAS was invited to work with members of the U.S. House and Senate on draft legislation.
Accomplishment #2
NAS was invited to brief staff members at the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security, the GAO, and the White House on Confucius Institutes. This report has been featured in Foreign Affairs, Forbes, and NRO.
Accomplishment #3
In Feb. 2017, NAS published the Freedom to Learn Amendments to support healthy competition, individual excellence, and freedom from overregulation on American campuses. The HEA reauthorization (Dec. 2017), incorporated many of NAS's proposals, including some of our proposed language. Rep. Virginia Foxx reference our work during an address to Congress on the PROSPER Act.
Accomplishment #4
In 2016, NAS published The Disappearing Continent, the first systematic critique of the examination on European History. In 2017, the College Board made substantial revisions to the APEH course guide in response to our critiques.
Accomplishment #5
In April 2018, U-Penn Law Prof. Amy Wax was barred from teaching first-year courses when students demanded she be fired after she publicly expressed support for traditional marriage and opposition to affirmative action. NAS hosted a sold-out event to honor Prof. Wax for her academic courage.
Accomplishment #6
In April 2018, NAS launched our newest report, The Irreproducibility Crisis, in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C., at an event sponsored by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), Chairman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. An op-ed by NAS President Peter Wood and Research Director David Randall was featured in the Wall Street Journal in conjunction with the launch.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
National Association of Scholars
Board of directorsas of 01/23/2023
Dr. Keith Whitaker
National Association of Scholars
Term: 2021 - 2024
Daniel Asia
Stephen Balch
Jay Bergman
Peter Berkowitz
Ward Connerly
George Dent
Bruce Gilley
David Gordon
Keith Whitaker
Amy Wax
Bradley Watson
Richard Vedder
Wight Martindale
Thomas Klingenstein
Gail Heriot
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Not applicable -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Not applicable -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Not applicable