Pure Earth
Solve pollution. Save lives. Protect the planet.
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Today, hundreds of millions of people in low- and middle-income countries are exposed to dangerous toxic pollutants like lead and mercury, causing extraordinary health, economic, and societal damage. Pure Earth prevents and remediates such pollution to ensure that every person has the opportunity to live a healthy, productive life, and to reach their full potential.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Toxic Site Identification Program
The Toxic Site Identification Program (TSIP) endeavours to identify and screen contaminated sites in low- and middle-income countries where public health is at risk. The TSIP is not intended to be a comprehensive inventory of such sites, but rather is an effort to begin to understand the scope of the problem. More than 3,100 sites have been identified so far, and more than 1,800 screened on site. These sites alone represent a potential health risk to more than 80 million poor people. However, these 3,000 sites likely represent a small fraction of the overall total. By way of example, over the past twenty years, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has identified tens of thousands of sites in the US alone that require remediation, and its National Priorities List for urgent remediation currently contains more than 1,300 sites. [1] Analysis of the data and trends in the TSIP database indicates that as many as 200 million people may be affected.
In order to carry out site assessments, Pure Earth utilizes a network of national experts in each country to visit and document hazardous waste sites. These national investigators, often from the environment or health departments at a national university, are trained to identify and assess contaminated sites using a rapid assessment tool called the Initial Site Screening (ISS) protocol. Government representatives also attend the training. The ISS identifies major elements of a contaminated site, including estimated population at risk, key pollutant information, human exposure pathway data and sampling data. As part of the training, a field visit is made by the group to demonstrate the methodology for assessing the human health impact of toxic sites. Since 2012, GAHP has held training workshops in fourteen countries, and trained nearly 150 investigators and 90 government representatives how to identify and assess toxic sites.
Global Lead Program
Pure Earth’s Global Lead Program has been instrumental in elevating lead exposure as a priority for action by governments, policymakers, major funders, and other national and global actors. By bringing greater visibility and increased understanding of lead exposure through the generation of new data and evidence on its prevalence, severity, and sources, and through advocacy around impacts and interventions to prevent or mitigate it, the importance of tackling lead exposure is steadily gaining traction.
Pure Earth’s Global Lead Program strategy is designed around a 5-phase approach :
1. Health Surveillance
2. Source Analyses
3. Source-specific Interventions
4. Communications
5. Institutional Strengthening
Global Mercury Program
Pure Earth’s Global Mercury Program strategy focuses on decreasing mercury emissions to the environment from the main source of pollution- artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM)—and reducing human exposures with an emphasis on the most severely affected populations, namely miners and surrounding communities.
Our programs include:
- Training artisanal and small-scale gold miners in safe and profitable mercury-free mining techniques.
- Working directly with miners to safely close out old mining sites and rehabilitate degraded ecosystems through reforestation and other techniques.
- Working with the jewelry industry to solve the global issue of mercury pollution from ASGM.
- Promoting the recovery and responsible management of mercury from contaminated ASGM tailings.
Global Commission on Health and Pollution
The Commission on Pollution and Health is an initiative of The Lancet, the Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP), and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The Commission comprises many of the world’s most influential leaders, researchers and practitioners in the fields of pollution management, environmental health and sustainable development.
The Report by the Commission on Pollution and Health will be published in The Lancet in the fall of 2017. The Report will analyze and communicate the massive scope of the health and economic costs of air, water and soil pollution. Through analyses of existing and emerging data, the Report will reveal pollution’s severe and underreported contribution to the Global Burden of Disease. It will uncover the economic costs of pollution to low- and middle-income countries, and compare the costs of inaction to the costs of available solutions. It will inform key decision makers around the world about the burden that pollution places on health and economic development, and about cost-effective pollution control solutions and strategies. The Commission will bring pollution squarely into the international development agenda.
Commission Partners
The Lancet is one of the world’s oldest and best known medical journals, publishing a weekly journal and nine monthly specialty journals in the fields of global health, diabetes and endocrinology, oncology, haematology, neurology, psychiatry, respiratory medicine, infectious diseases and HIV.
The Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP) is a collaborative body that facilitates the provision of technical and financial resources to governments and communities to reduce the impacts of pollution on health in low- and middle-income countries. GAHP members include World Bank, European Commission, UNEP, UNDP, UNIDO, Asian Development Bank, ministries of environment and health from around the world, and a host of civil society organizations. The non-profit organization Pure Earth (formerly Blacksmith Institute) is the Secretariat of GAHP and coordinates the work of the Commission.
The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is an international leader in medical and scientific training, biomedical research, and patient care. It is the medical school for the Mount Sinai Health System, which includes seven hospital campuses, and has more than 5,000 faculty and nearly 2,000 students, residents and fellows.
Where we work
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of children tested for blood lead levels
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Global Lead Program
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Conduct baseline BLL (blood lead level) testing and analysis to understand prevalence, severity and location of exposure.
Number of public events held to further mission
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of environmental assessments completed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Toxic Site Identification Program
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of home-based assessments conducted
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Global Lead Program
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of reports written/published
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Lead and mercury are two of the most prevalent pollutants in low- and middle-income countries, and pose a greater risk than all other Top Ten Chemicals of Concern identified by WHO. Through 2030, Pure Earth is focusing on these pollutants through two core programmatic areas in nine countries.
The objective of our Global Lead Program is to measurably and sustainably reduce lead pollution and poisoning using a 5-phase approach, which includes health surveillance, exposure source analysis, source-specific interventions, communications, and institutional strengthening.
Our Global Mercury Program aims to reduce mercury pollution from the leading source of emissions — artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM). The goal is to reduce mercury exposure and poisoning, by targeting the most severely affected populations: miners and surrounding communities.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Global Lead Program Strategy:
Our goal is to measurably and sustainably reduce lead pollution and poisoning where we work and to encourage and enable increased action by other stakeholders in the global health and development sphere. Pure Earth’s Global Lead Program strategy is designed around a framework consisting of five core elements that apply in all countries. This 5-phase approach was informed by our years of experience implementing over 50 projects in multiple countries to mitigate lead exposure.
1. Health Surveillance: Conduct baseline blood lead level (BLL) testing and analysis to understand prevalence, severity and location of exposure.
2. Source Analyses: Measure likely sources in homes where people have elevated lead levels, to determine the most significant sources of exposure.
3. Source-specific Interventions: Design and implement a range of interventions to reduce exposures and the use or release of lead in products and industrial processes.
4. Communications: Disseminate findings and recommendations to inform and build support with governments and funders for action.
5. Institutional Strengthening: Enhance the capabilities of government institutions to plan, implement, and sustain effective public health programs to reduce lead poisoning.
Global Mercury Program:
Pure Earth's Mercury Program Strategy focuses on decreasing mercury emissions to the environment from the main source of pollution, artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM), and reducing human exposures with an emphasis on the most severely affected populations, namely miners and surrounding communities. Pure Earth endeavors to contribute to the generation of needed health data and health systems capacity; to engage with communities, industries, governments, and global networks to share knowledge and advocate for strong, wellfunctioning regulatory frameworks; and to increased resources and capacity focused on addressing mercury.
Supporting the Transition of Miners to Mercury-Free Techniques:
1. Promotion by governments (policy and regulatory recommendations).
2. Awareness and community education among miners and their families.
3. Training on mercury-free mining techniques
4. Testing of new technologies.
5. Market-based activities that: 1) increase demand for mercury-free gold; 2) offer other incentives to produce or purchase mercury-free gold; 3) ensure a low-friction market for mercury-free gold transactions.
Managing Sites Contaminated with Mercury:
1. Toxic Site Identification Program (TSIP). This includes environmental assessments, health risk assessments and database management of contaminated sites.
2. Tailings management (cleanup and disposal).
3. Reforestation, biochar fixation and phytoremediation methods.
4. Responsible mercury waste management strategies, including disposal.
5. Community awareness and education as well as risk communication activities.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, We don’t have the right technology to collect and aggregate feedback efficiently, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Pure Earth
Board of directorsas of 09/07/2024
Ethan Sawyer
Guggenheim Securities
Richard Fuller
Pure Earth
Conrad Meyer III
Paul Brooke
PMSV Holdings
Charlotte Triefus
Paul Roux
Roux Associates
Kathryn Huarte
Anna Mutoh
Gloria Janata
TogoRun
Ethan Sawyer
Guggenheim Securities
Francois Guillon
Omni Planning
Howard Hu, M.D., M.P.H., Sc.D.
University of Southern California
Tabassum Inamdar
Tameel — Impact Strategy Research
Alicia Ogawa
Columbia School of Business
David Hunter, MBBS, MPH, ScD, FAFPHM
University of Oxford
Troy Hysmith
The Nature Conservancy
Karen Mathiasen
Center for Global Development
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Not applicable
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 08/19/2024GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.