COMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC
I have a voice, my voice is powerful, my voice can change the world.
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
CWP addresses the learning needs of K-12 students in New York City. In serving this community CWP has confronted the challenge that only 59% of students in New York City’s low-income neighborhoods are proficient in the skills they need to succeed academically and in life. For students who are learning English for the first time; managing disabilities; or experiencing instability in their living situation, the challenges of learning are particularly acute. Often these students have learning needs that remain unmet by their schools. CWP has deep, attentive, partnerships with schools and partner organizations in order to support this student need within the school, and in the communities surrounding the schools.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Collaborative Arts Residency Program
In our Collaborative Arts Residency Program (CAR), Teaching Artists (TAs) integrate creative writing and visual arts, music, dance, or theater into the curriculum to help students improve their literacy and develop creative, critical thinking, and socio-emotional skills. CAR takes place in New York City public schools, both in-class and after-school programming with K-12 students. Students work on specialized projects such as creating published anthologies, murals, and more. We believe that when a learning space is transformed by the arts, young people thrive because they find new ways to learn, to be heard, and to connect with one another and their communities.
Teaching Artist Project (TAP)
Teaching Artist Project (TAP) provides a 25-week Teaching Artists' training program, placing trained teaching artists into New York City classrooms. TAP also conducts Summer Institute, a three day intensive training for experienced teaching artist nationwide. CWP provides additional trainings for advanced teaching artists, helping them to strengthen their skills and learn new teaching tools in preparation for the new school year.
Professional Development
CWP's professional development opportunities include workshops for public school teachers, after-school leaders, and youth workers to help them to integrate creativity and community-building exercises into classroom and after-school curricula and programs.
CWP 2.0
15 students work in close partnership with staff from CWP and NYU's Tandon School of Engineering to engage in design thinking alongside multidisciplinary artistic and curricular development integrating technology and the arts. CWP also provides students in the program with college and career development opportunities such as college visits and tech sector networking.
Where we work
Awards
Partner in Excellence 2009
Young Audiences New York
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of students who demonstrate writing ability
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth
Related Program
Collaborative Arts Residency Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Partner classroom teachers and participants 3 grade & up complete pre- and post-surveys that help assess writing ability. CWP teaching artists also reflect and provide examples of growth in writing.
Number of children who have a sense of their own feelings and an ability to express empathy for others
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth
Related Program
Collaborative Arts Residency Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Participants in grades 3+ take pre- and post- program self-assessment that focuses on SEL.
Number of children who have the ability to use language for expression and to communicate with others
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth
Related Program
Collaborative Arts Residency Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We conduct pre- and post-program assessment with teachers and students on this metric. Teachers consistently see students' increased ability to use literary devices as well as more expansive language.
Number of students with good social and leadership skills and self-discipline
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Collaborative Arts Residency Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We conduct a pre- and post-program SEL self-assessment with students that includes self-management.
Number of students who demonstrate the desire to succeed in the academic setting
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We conduct a pre- and post-program SEL self-assessment with students that includes self-management and academic self-efficacy.
Number of teachers who demonstrate effective teaching practices
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Related Program
Teaching Artist Project (TAP)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
This is assessed based on teaching artist pre- and post-program assessment and mentorship observation.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Community-Word Project aims to ensure that young people in New York City can envision, invest in, and build a community different from the one failing to meet their needs. The key goals of CWP's residency programs are to:
-Make the classroom a safe, creative space where each student feels challenged and supported to put ideas forward with confidence and discover the power of working together.
-Offer multiple ways to engage different kinds of learners, and provide a creative learning environment not often available in our culture of high-stakes testing.
-Engage highly-trained multidisciplinary teaching artists in New York City school classrooms
-Provide a sustained experience for students through a 10 to 25 week classroom presence during each school year and a continuing to “bridge" programs from their elementary to middle school years.
-Help NYC's public school students meet the New York State Common Core Standards in English Language Arts for Writing and Literacy.
-Focus on literacy by bringing a writer alongside another artist into every classroom to ensure that each student practices articulating and expressing their ideas, concerns and aspirations.
-Promote equal access for students of all learning levels, especially English as a New Language learners and students with Special Needs.
- Help youth to individually and collectively articulate and express social justice issues of importance to them.
-Providing professional development workshops for classroom teachers, after-school leaders, and youth workers to integrate creativity into the classroom and after-school programs.
By working collaboratively in a safe and positive classroom environment, CWP students learn to think creatively and analytically, embrace differences, solve problems, and confidently share ideas so that they are better prepared to make positive change in their communities and their lives.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The heart of CWP’s activities is the empowerment through the arts of students annually in schools, libraries and homeless shelters. We operate in NYC neighborhoods where 70% of residents live in poverty and students struggle with the effects of underperforming schools; unstable households; and the linguistic challenges of recent immigration.
Our actions to achieve the empowerment we seek are threefold:
In our Collaborative Arts Residency Program (CAR), Teaching Artists (TAs) integrate creative writing and visual arts, music, dance, or theater into the curriculum to help students improve their literacy and develop creative, critical thinking, and socio-emotional skills.
The Teaching Artist Project (TAP) provides an opportunity for artists and educators to engage in a self reflective process while in a supportive, artist empowered and creative-inquiry-based community. In the program, participants have the freedom to unpack their own pedagogy, in service of their justice oriented and student centered teaching practice. Our hope is to leverage our arts education models’ collective impact and scale, through continued collaboration with our cohort of 15 peer arts organizations such as Brooklyn Arts Council, DreamYard Project, and National Dance Institute.
CWP’s professional development sessions prepare classroom teachers, after-school leaders, and youth professionals with the expertise to integrate creative writing and collaborative arts into their curricula.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Guided by these outcomes, CWP measures a number of indicators of student skills development, using formal observations twice over the course of each residency to ensure that benchmarks towards our student outcomes are being achieved (for example, students are taking leadership roles in collaborative projects, students are listening respectfully to each other's ideas, students understand the importance of revising their work), to assess teaching artists' classroom management and teaching skills, and to give the teaching artists feedback...
Along with the surveys, Community-Word Project uses several other methods to assess the success of our residency program. Before the residency begins, our evaluation manager administers an initial assessment tool that includes a short written description of an image. The tool is then administered at the end of the residency in order to see how much CWP students have improved in CWP's five essential outcomes (Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, Literacy, Emotional Intelligence) as well as their overall writing techniques. In addition, three times each year, we collect writing samples and evaluate them based on CWP-developed rubrics in order to assess the quality of the work in connection with lesson plan that generated the work.
CWP focuses on measurable impact and continuous program improvement by using multiple methods of evaluation. We take a deep, individualized look at arts residency and training effectiveness in order to maintain program strengths and identify areas in need of improvement. Each tool and the corresponding outcomes and indicators continue to be revised based on program outcomes and previous evaluations. This data-driven approach ensures that our programs strengthen Teaching Artist (TA) practices and student aptitude.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
CWP's 20-21 Evaluation Report:
Our outcomes from the past year continue to encourage our work and demonstrate the dire need for arts education in the communities we serve. The power of the arts continues to grow skills in Literacy, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, Emotional Intelligence, and Engagement Citizenship. For example, last year at the beginning of their residency students reported that only 11% of them could create new and meaningful ideas by using a range of idea creation techniques such as brainstorming, adopting, adapting and researching, yet at the end of the residency the same students reported that 47% of them now felt confident in that skill. Also, at the beginning of the residency students reported that only 11% felt that they could behave empathetically toward their classroom community, and at the end of the residency those same students jumped to 60%. Overall, 88% of students grew in more than one social emotional learning capacity, which is particularly meaningful during the second school year impacted by COVID-19. As one fourth grade student said about their experience in CAR, “I learned that I should speak up more because at the end of our lessons we say we have a voice… which you can use to share opinions and make ideas to make the world a better place.”
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
For over 20 years CWP has served two overlapping communities; students from historically underinvested neighborhoods, and teaching artists. Our first community is K-12 students in NYC’s five Boroughs. 14% of CWP’s students are English Language Learners and 91% of students receive government assistance. Artists who work as teaching artists are our second, aligned community. They are vital to the success of our art residencies and as a group they have also been adversely impacted by COVID-19, with over 60% identifying within racial/ethnic groups that have been the worst affected by the pandemic.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
During the pandemic our teaching artists provided feedback around the types of hardship support they would like to see CWP help with. In recognition of this feedback, and of our TAs financial and emotional stress, we restructured our Professional Development programs to provide medical and mental health reimbursements and regular stress relieving programs such as art therapy and art making together.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
COMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC
Board of directorsas of 01/23/2023
Joan Sapinsley
Fordham
Term: 2019 -
Tracey Bey-Johnson
Trace Paper Co.
Term: 2020 -
Michele Kotler
Community-Word Project
Marcus Vinicius Ribeiro
Principal - Americas, PRISA
Dillon Cohen
Art Dealer
Susanne Russotto
AllianceBernstein
Alex Perry
Ernst & Young
Jason Lynch
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Rossanna Ionescu
TD Bank
Joan Sapinsley
Fordham University
Andrew Ho
Global Strategy Group
Sam Tortora
BlackRock
Tracey Bey-Johnson
Trace Paper Co.
Colleen Lima
BNYMellon
Jessica Hogue
Innovid
Monica Chen
Bloomberg
Shannon Nelson-Tai
BlackRock
Lori Bullock
DigitasHealth
Deepak Shrivastava
The Flex Co.
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 12/21/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.