Chess-in-the-Schools, Inc.
Helping kids grow, one move at a time.
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
The need for youth from low-income, underserved communities to have access to educational programs to build their intellectual and social skills.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
School Program
The School Program brings chess into classrooms and after-school chess clubs. During the summer, students continue to hone their skills in our summer camps. All elementary and middle schools served by the School Program are public and have low-income populations
Tournment Program
The Scholastic Tournament Program offers free, year-round, competitive chess tournaments in New York City. On weekends and school holidays, tournaments draw between 400 and 850 players from kindergarten through high school. Chess in the Schools organizes and directs 25 tournaments annually ensuring students are challenged and encouraged
College Bound Program
The College Bound Program serves approximately 100 high school students who have participated in the School Program. Students are generally the first in their family to aspire to attend college. The College Bound Program provides comprehensive college readiness services, employment and other opportunities to help our students graduate high school on time and attend college.
Teacher Training Institute
The Teacher Training Program, offers workshops, chess materials, and support to help classroom teachers implement a comprehensive chess program in their own schools.
Where we work
External reviews

Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of children taught
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Economically disadvantaged people, Children and youth, At-risk youth
Related Program
School Program
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of teachers trained
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Teacher Training Institute
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Percent of high school students graduating from high school
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adolescents, At-risk youth, Economically disadvantaged people
Related Program
College Bound Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Percent of high seniors matriculating to college
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adolescents, At-risk youth, Economically disadvantaged people
Related Program
College Bound Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Percent of classroom teachers reporting that chess improved students' analytical and logical reasoning.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth, At-risk youth, Economically disadvantaged people
Related Program
School Program
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Improving children's thinking skills as a path to academic achievement.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Teaching chess in elementary and middle schools.
After-school chess clubs.
Weekend chess tournaments.
College readiness program.
Teacher training for public school teachers.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
We train and manage a staff of chess instructors and college readiness leaders.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
To date, we have taught over 500,000 NYC public schoolchildren chess.
Our College Bound Program regularly achieves high school graduation rates of 100% and college matriculation rates over 95%.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
We serve elementary, middle, and high school students. We also serve teachers.
-
How is your organization collecting feedback from the people you serve?
Electronic surveys (by email, tablet, etc.), Paper surveys,
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals,
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
Based on the findings of SEL (social and emotional learning) student surveys in our College Bound program, we added leadership opportunities for students.
-
With whom is the organization sharing feedback?
The people we serve, Our staff, Our board, Our funders,
-
How has asking for feedback from the people you serve changed your relationship?
Especially in our College Bound program, we have become more responsive to student feedback and more mindful of the social and emotional learning potential within the program.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded,
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection,
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Chess-in-the-Schools, Inc.
Board of directorsas of 10/14/2022
Mr. Mark Maher
Spotify
Term: 2021 - 2022
Debbie Eastburn
President & CEO, Chess-in-the-Schools
Cody Smith
No Affiliation
Mark Maher
Spotify
Lawrence Benenson
Benenson Capital Partners LLC
Mike Walsh Peissis
Vetta Inc.
Kwadwo Acheampong
PIMCO
Praju Doshi
Credit Suisse
Chun Lin
Bank of America
Jon Zald
PJT Partners
Dann Ryan
Sincerus Advisory
Andy Lerner
IA Capital
Dhruv Sharma
PwC
Andy Smith
Pillsbury
Dave Stein
Adobe
Richard Wagner
ABILITY Network
Anthony Sandrik
Carta
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 10/14/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.