Institute for State Effectiveness
The Institute for State Effectiveness (ISE) works on pathways for economic development, peace, and stability within countries and across regions. We believe opportunity lies in developing the tools and insight to support communities, governments, and international organizations to make institutions more inclusive and accountable to citizens.
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Afghanistan Support Program
Afghanistan will remain a politically complex context for the foreseeable future, in which no regular development cooperation can take place in the absence of a legitimate government. Innovative ways to respond to the deteriorating humanitarian, economic, and human rights situation are required. The program offers analysis, advice, and lessons learned (both from Afghanistan and other contexts) to inform policies and approaches to provide assistance to the population. It engages with international governments, multilateral agencies (e.g. World Bank and UN), as well as international and local NGOs. It also carries out periodic community-based assessments on access to aid in rural areas and the situation of women.
Ukraine
ISE’s Ukraine Reconstruction and Recovery Initiative aims to support effective decision-making by Ukrainian leadership and international allies on key issues while also setting the stage to align stakeholders toward a coordinated architecture for international assistance and reconstruction. The work is informed by ISE’s decades of experience working on country transformations and insights from Ukrainian experts and stakeholders. It utilizes the latest thinking, tools and best practices on country recoveries and transformations that are responsive to citizens and aim to re-establish the foundations for Ukraine’s future prosperity. In its analysis and support to stakeholders, ISE incorporates lessons from successful examples of post-conflict transformation, anticipates challenges and formulates policy recommendations for Ukrainian and international stakeholders going forward.
Lesotho
ISE’s program in Lesotho aims to improve transparency and accountability systems for government and the public evaluation of public finance and performance of public service delivery programs. ISE engages with a wide range of stakeholders in the country – from the national government to donors to communities and civil society actors. ISE’s program builds upon ongoing efforts to improve the recording and publishing of information related to government reforms through dashboards systems by incorporating budget and performance management information into existing reform tracker dashboards, developing recommendations for a public-facing reform tracker dashboard, and developing associated citizen-centered materials and tools based on dashboard content. This work will be reinforced through capacity building initiatives to ensure sustainable local ownership through knowledge transfer to the GOL and public during and after the project.
Where we work
External reviews

How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Institute for State Effectiveness
Board of directorsas of 06/07/2023
Clare Lockhart
ISE
Philip Munger
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Not applicable
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 06/01/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.