Common Ground Committee Inc
Bringing Light Not Heat to Public Discourse
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
A persistent hurdle plaguing America is polarized governance and the incivility that goes with it. As the 2016 presidential election demonstrated, the public is increasingly restless. It hungers for and is demanding positive productivity from public servants, for results rather than gridlock. Such an outcome requires an ability to find ways for opposing sides to work together both at the leadership and citizen levels. The culture of discourse today is full of anger and rancor. It favors arguing and trading insults over reasoned debate that uses well-researched facts and maintains an eye toward making progress on a given issue.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
CGC Public Forum
Common Ground Committee Public Forums are high-profile discussions which illustrate how areas of mutual interest or agreement become evident when participants move away from "talking points” to thoughtful dialogue.
LET’S FIND COMMON GROUND: Podcast
A PODCAST THAT SEEKS COMMON SOLUTIONS TO TODAY’S VITAL ISSUES
With anger and polarization dominating American public discourse, Common Ground Committee offers a healing path to reaching agreement and moving forward. We talk with top leaders in public policy, finance, academe and more to encourage the seeking and finding of points of agreement, demonstrate how passionate but civil debate can enable us to make progress, and provide illuminating insight on important issues.
Vote Common Ground: Scorecard
The Common Ground Scorecard provides an objective, easy-to-understand assessment of the degree to which elected officials and candidates for office embody the spirit and practice of a Common Grounder — someone who seeks points of agreement and solutions on social and political issues through listening and productive conversation. The Common Ground Scorecard does not assess issue positions, only common ground spirit and practice. “More progress, less division.”
For more information on this program please view our website: https://commongroundscorecard.org/#faqs
Where we work
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Total dollars received in contributions
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Related Program
CGC Public Forum
Type of Metric
Other - describing something else
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Measures contribution revenue recognized
Number of groups brought together in a coalition/alliance/partnership
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Related Program
CGC Public Forum
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Measures the number of other organizations with which we partner in some way to bring about a mission-related program or event.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Common Ground Committee is focused on “Bringing Light Not Heat To Public Discourse". It is our intent that this light will stimulate progress toward finding the common ground on which citizens can make informed decisions, inspire citizens to raise the level of their own discourse and motivate both citizens and leaders take intelligent action.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
At the heart of our work is demonstration. Because it has been so long since many have seen civil discourse leading to results, we consider it fundamentally vital to demonstrate to target audiences what good public discourse looks like and to consistently curate and illuminate for citizens and leaders shining examples to emulate and behavior to model.
To that end, since 2010 Common Ground Committee (CGC) we have been successfully producing public forums in New York City and New England. These have mostly been for general audiences.
But in 2017, CGC began to focus on addressing the significant challenges of discourse at college campuses, starting with a very successful forum at Middlebury College in Vermont, the site of the nationally publicized March 2, 2017 Charles Murray incident.
Our forums have attracted thousands of thoughtful, influential citizens and media. These are political debates – but with a twist. Panelist performance is judged not on clever talking points that support one's own views, but on the degree to which one can work with other panelists to find common ground. CGC forums feature nationally known panelists from all sides of the political spectrum and prominent voices in public policy work, national media, private sector, etc. They may have opposing views but during the course of the forum they share how common ground is attainable on some of the most difficult issues of the day.
By demonstrating “what good looks like" we are inspiring those that view our events in person or on-line to (a) step-up their own discourse to a level where they actively listen, engage respectfully and contribute positively to a problem's solution; (b) demand that their political leaders do and (c) vote for candidates they believe will do so.
We support and augment our forums through our own blogs and using social media to promote, highlight and curate situations where opposite sides have worked together to solve difficult problems. These serve to further the demonstrate how effective discourse and debate can take place and make a difference.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
We have developed a robust methodology for our forums that creates an environment where panelists of opposite views work together and find common ground.
We have very strong event production skill. We have a professional television show producer with decades of experience who leads the creation of programs of outstanding content and the finest production quality. The result is a superior, inspiring experience for our audiences.
We can attract very strong panelists (e.g., Barney Frank, Art Laffer) who appreciate what we are working to accomplish.
We know how to partner. Our strongest partnership is with the Christian Science Monitor (CSM) who not only works with us to develop the content of the forum but also provides an associate to moderate a given forum. All CGC forums have been moderated by someone from the CSM, including the CSM Editor.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
As of the end of 2023, CGC has held 17 forum events, as well as several online events promoting the work of others. These events were promoted in coordination with other Bridging partners and have been uploaded on the organization's YouTube site with over 500 subscribers.
CGC also broadcast one hundred podcasts by the end of 2023 with over 550,000 downloads and 260,000 subscribers. The podcast series, entitled Let's Find Common Ground utilizes the broadcasting experience of other members of the community and highlights the works of other community members as well.
Our faculty liaison reported:
Students were impressed to see two people who they mostly knew from their history books actually come to Middlebury to debate. They liked the format, and the opportunity to ask questions. perhaps the most memorable part of the night for many students was (former Massachusetts Congressman) Barney Frank talking about what it was like to be in the vanguard of the gay rights movements in an era when many people didn't want to talk about it that really resonated with students still struggling with our own experience in shutting down views with which we disagreed." We secured foundation funding in 2017 that allows us to produce more frequent events and build staff. We believe our 2018 fundraising efforts will yield record results.
We have built strong partnerships. The (former) Editor of the Christian Science Monitor (CSM) said this:
Common Ground Committee promotes a bridge-building spirit in our public life. That same spirit animates The Christian Science Monitor. As a news organization, we have no policy program or agenda to promote. But we seek to cover issues in a way that illuminates shared views and explains differences more clearly across divides, on the theory that a difference made more clear is often a difference made smaller. In a different way, but with very similar motives, Common Ground Committee literally brings people otherwise at odds together. It's a noble effort to create a constructive public life in a fractured and polarized political landscape. The Christian Science Monitor is pleased to share this common cause with Common Ground Committee." - Marshall Ingwerson
Besides the CSM, we partner with Living Room Conversations, the Bridge Alliance and The Nantucket Project. We will finalize more partnerships in 2018.
We have developed a stronger cadence in our blogger social networking efforts, attracting new social media followers. In 2018, marketing strategy and execution, including social media, will become our highest priority next to forum execution.
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Common Ground Committee Inc
Board of directorsas of 04/05/2024
Barry Persky
Common Ground Commitee
Term: 2024 - 2024
Erik Olsen
Co-Founder & CEO, Board Member
Don Holtz
Board Member
Barry Persky
Board Member
Chip Horner
Board Member
Inez Maubane Jones
Board Member
Gina Lindquist-Bailey
Board Member
Ursula Mueller
Board Member
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
No data
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data