PLATINUM2023

Jhumki Basu Foundation

STEM Ed Innovators are anti-racist, culturally responsive educators who prepare every young person for STEM careers that build a more just world.

Saratoga, CA   |  https://www.stemedinnovators.org/

Mission

JBF's mission is to develop excellent STEM teachers in American public schools. We strive to improve student performance in STEM subjects through inspirational teachers, thereby building a future STEM-savvy workforce in America

Ruling year info

2010

Principal Officer

Dipak Basu

Main address

14435c Big Basin Way

Saratoga, CA 95070 USA

Show more contact info

EIN

30-0591093

NTEE code info

Youth Development Programs (O50)

IRS filing requirement

This organization is required to file an IRS Form 990 or 990-EZ.

Sign in or create an account to view Form(s) 990 for 2022, 2021 and 2021.
Register now

Communication

Programs and results

What we aim to solve

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

The long-term viability of most sectors of the US economy requires a workforce with advanced skills in STEM. However, the US is far from being on track to fill the projected number of STEM jobs of the future. If the talent development system is not reinvented, it is estimated that by 2025 the U.S. will have 12-24 million jobs that will go unfilled across the entire US economy. On the other hand, The STEM talent gap in the workforce is multi-faceted, complex and is inextricably linked to social issues such as poverty, inequality, and youth unemployment. Low US student achievement in mathematics and science compared to other countries is attributed in part to poor K-12 standards due to shortages in qualified STEM teachers resulting in large achievement gaps which refer to the disparity in academic performance between groups of students. The gap shows up in grades, standardized-test scores, course selections, dropout rates, college-completion rates, among other success measures. It is

Our programs

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?

Design Lab

STEM teachers explore equity frameworks and research-based teaching strategies to improve practice through a four-part centered design cycle.

Population(s) Served
Teachers

Where we work

Affiliations & memberships

Boston College 2017

Our results

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.

Number of teachers trained

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Related Program

Design Lab

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Our Sustainable Development Goals

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.

Goals & Strategy

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.

Charting impact

Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.

Mission and Purpose

JBF's mission is to develop excellent STEM teachers in American public schools.

We strive to improve student performance in STEM subjects through inspirational teachers, thereby building a future STEM-savvy workforce in America


Major projects and Activities

Under the STEM Ed Innovators banner, JBF conducts several mentored online programs for STEM teachers to learn new skills to better engage students from difficult backgrounds in STEM subjects. All programs are based on teachers developing empathy with their students to understand and apply their funds of knowledge in their learning. In the programs, there is a strong focus on applying JBF methods to solve a problem of practice in the classroom and subsequent peer evaluation.

The programs are:

6-month Fellowship
6-week Design Lab
2-week Equity Leaders’ program
2-week Mentor Development program

Since its inception in 2009, JBF has trained more than 450 teachers and touched over 150,000 public school students across the United States. We recruit course participants through word of mouth, social media or partnerships with school districts and school networks. The Equity Leaders’ program is designed for school leaders to take ownership of our programs and implement them in their communities.

Surveys and case studies indicate that participation in JBF program lead to significant increase in STEM teaching confidence and satisfaction, more student interest in STEM subjects, and improved grades. JBF alumni enjoy membership in peer networks to share ideas, experiences and curricula in an essentially lonely and burnout-prone profession.

People Served

The majority of people served by JBF are elementary, middle and high school STEM teachers, with two to fifteen years teaching experience. They are mostly graduates aged 25 to 40. Ethnicity-wise our alumni are 40% African-American, 35% White, 15% Hispanic, 10% Asian. Incomes and benefits are set by state school boards and range from $70K to $150K per year.

JBF has been delivering Democratic STEM Teaching programs to educators since 2010. We have over time built a rich library of training material, case studies and testimonials. JBF's face-to-face delivery method of a 9-month fellowship has, over time, expanded to a series of virtual programs to better leverage resources, and reach a national and audience of teachers. Since 2010 JBF has touched over 500 teachers and 200,000 students through its own program delivery. Evaluations and surveys have indicated on average 40-45% improvement in teacher confidence in the classroom and student engagement in their classrooms. Now with established brand recognition, the recently introduced Equity Leaders Institute allows school leaders to deliver JBF programs themselves, thereby significantly increasing our reach and efficiency.

We are a program for teachers by teachers. Our leadership team is comprised of teacher leaders who leverage researched back strategies in our programs.

JBF has been delivering Democratic STEM Teaching programs to educators since 2010. We have over time built a rich library of training material, case studies and testimonials. JBF's face-to-face delivery method of a 9-month fellowship has, over time, expanded to a series of virtual programs to better leverage resources, and reach a national and audience of teachers. Since 2010 JBF has touched over 500 teachers and 200,000 students through its own program delivery. Evaluations and surveys have indicated on average 40-45% improvement in teacher confidence in the classroom and student engagement in their classrooms. Now with established brand recognition, the recently introduced Equity Leaders Institute allows school leaders to deliver JBF programs themselves, thereby significantly increasing our reach and efficiency.

How we listen

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.

done We shared information about our current feedback practices.
  • How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?

    To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals

  • Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?

    We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded

  • What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?

    We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback

Financials

Jhumki Basu Foundation
lock

Unlock financial insights by subscribing to our monthly plan.

Subscribe

Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more about GuideStar Pro.

Operations

The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.

lock

Connect with nonprofit leaders

Subscribe

Build relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.

lock

Connect with nonprofit leaders

Subscribe

Build relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.

Jhumki Basu Foundation

Board of directors
as of 07/07/2023
SOURCE: Self-reported by organization
Board chair

Dipak Basu

Jhumki Basu Foundation

Term: 2009 -

Sehba Ali

KIPP Texas

Ron Hallagan

Retired E&Y

Leslie Duhaylongsod

Salem State College

Radha Ramaswami Basu

iMerit

Board leadership practices

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.

  • Board orientation and education
    Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? No
  • CEO oversight
    Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No
  • Ethics and transparency
    Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes
  • Board composition
    Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes
  • Board performance
    Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes

Organizational demographics

SOURCE: Self-reported; last updated 6/27/2023

Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.

Leadership

The organization's leader identifies as:

Race & ethnicity
Asian/Asian American
Gender identity
Male, Not transgender (cisgender)
Sexual orientation
Heterosexual or straight
Disability status
Person without a disability

Race & ethnicity

Gender identity

 

Sexual orientation

No data

Disability

Equity strategies

Last updated: 06/27/2023

GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more

Data
  • We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
  • We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
Policies and processes
  • We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
  • We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
  • We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
  • We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
  • We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.