CORNEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
"That all who look may see"
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
The Cornea Research Foundation of America is working to help individuals obtain their best possible vision by pioneering new and optimizing current treatment options for vision problems like Fuchs' dystrophy, keratoconus, glaucoma, cataracts, eye infections, dry eye and more.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Studies to advance corneal transplant outcomes and other ocular conditions
Since 1988, we have been involved in research to help people regain lost sight. Of the many studies we perform annually, our longest running program been tracking long-term cornea transplant patient outcomes in the Cornea Transplant Database. We now have records on more than 10,000 patients in what is known as the Cornea Transplant Database, the largest such database in the Americas. This database has assisted in making many discoveries by allowing us to see trends—what’s working well and what’s not working so well, so we can continually refine surgical techniques and patient care resulting in better outcomes. We use this database to assist us in identifying areas in which more research is needed.
Here are just a few examples illustrating how this database has proven invaluable:
-Dr. Price was an early pioneer of small incision transplants (DSEK and DMEK). Our database helped prove that these newer methods are safer and provide much faster visual recovery than full thickness transplants, which had been the previous standard of care.
-We showed that cataract surgery can be combined safely with DSEK or DMEK thereby allowing patients to have cataract and corneal problems treated at the same time. --A single surgery is safer, easier for people, and more cost effective than separate surgeries.
-Many of our patients have conditions that cause both corneas to go bad. We’ve demonstrated that we can safely treat the second eye with DMEK just one week after the first so that people can get back to work and resume daily activities sooner.
-Transplant rejection has long been a leading reason for transplant failure. Our data has proven that DMEK has a far lower risk of being rejected by the recipient than earlier transplant techniques.
-Taking advantage of the low risk of rejection with DMEK (<1% risk), we’ve shown that we can safely reduce the strength and dosing frequency of anti-rejection medication and reduce medication-associated side effects.
Our proven results are instrumental in convincing transplant surgeons to adopt these newer techniques and improve outcomes for patients worldwide.
- See more at: www.cornea.org
Where we work
External reviews

Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of participants engaged in programs
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Studies to advance corneal transplant outcomes and other ocular conditions
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of participants attending course/session/workshop
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Optometry education courses
Number of training workshops
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
cornea couses
Number of organizational partners
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Partners
Number of research studies conducted
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Research studies
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
The Foundation has tracked the progress of thousands of patients, helped pioneer small incision corneal transplants and conducted more than 100 innovative clinical research studies. All of which has led to improved treatment options and the approval of drugs and devices for use in the United States. This effort has given thousands of people back the use of their eyes, putting them back to work and improving their quality of life. Looking forward, there’s still much to do.
• GOAL #1: Drive advances in cornea transplant outcomes
• GOAL #2: Provide new vision restorative treatments to patients through clinical studies in collaboration with partners around the globe
Education has a profound effect on the success of our goals to provide the best vision care through research. Without education to the providers and users in the medical community, research has little impact. Our goal is to empower both doctors and patients with the knowledge and tools necessary to provide and receive the best patient care resulting in optimized outcomes. In the past 25 years, the Foundation has provided intensive training to more than 600 eye surgeons on the latest surgical techniques, and provided thousands of hours of continuing education to optometrists (often the first point of contact for eye care) so they can appropriately identify conditions and provide information to patients to help prevent vision loss.
• GOAL #1: Educate ophthalmologists on the latest advancements
• GOAL #2: Educate optometrists on the latest advancements in eye care
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
o Action A: Grow the largest cornea transplant database in Western hemisphere
o Action B: Leverage this resource through strategic data analyses to discern and document technique and drug improvements
o Action C: Conduct clinical trials of new treatments for cataracts, glaucoma, corneal problems, and refractive eye conditions to benefit patients, including short-term evaluation studies or multi-year initiatives
o Action D: Partner with companies on innovative new products to treat degenerative conditions of the eye and nervous system through restorative and regenerative technologies.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
The Cornea Research Foundation of America (CRFA) was founded by Francis W. Price Jr., M.D. in 1988 with a goal to establish a world center for clinical research and education specializing in corneal disease, corneal transplantation and intraocular lens surgery. A visionary physician, Dr. Price understood that corneal surgeries were increasing, in part, due to complications following cataract surgeries. In response, he created a database to store and track preoperative, surgical and postoperative statistics for transplants performed since 1982 within Price Vision Group.
His efforts were strengthened when the Indiana Lions Eye Bank became involved with the Foundation in 1990. Their contributions and many generous supporters have helped maintain the burgeoning Cornea Transplant Database that now houses data more than 8,000 transplants. Although the Foundation’s primary focus is on transplant data, its mission has evolved to include many other vision research initiatives.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
The Board of Directors provide leadership and guidance which assists in defining and maintaining the Foundation’s strategic direction. Board engagement is a critical component to the success of the strategic imperatives through both philanthropic activities and evaluating progress based on the metrics defined in the organization's Strategic Plan.
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
CORNEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
Board of directorsas of 06/12/2020
Francis Price, MD
Michael Mullen
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
Terry Coyle
Robert Grimm
IUPUI Kelley School of Business
Monica Rosenfeld
Hebrew Hasten Academy
Michael Waldner
Larry Kaelin
Julie Kitcoff
Huntington Bank
Sandy Gooding
Richard King, II
Matthew Feng, MD
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes