The Literacy Project Foundation
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
The Literacy Project Program Featuring The New Phonics Game™
The Literacy Project
uses their proprietary literacy product, The New Phonics Game™ that was co-developed by The Regents of the
University of California, to engage children in the learning process and to
develop critical literacy skills. Using
this tool, TLP provides a 30-hour in-classroom reading program at “no cost”
for second grade students. This program of exceptional merit is fun, socially
interactive, and promotes collaborative learning amongst students through group
experience.
The program is driven by specific goals:
To target specific schools with low
literacy rates, demographically disadvantaged youth in Title I,
"at-risk" and levels 3-5 schools of the Performance Improvement
("PI").
To provide a highly cost effective
learning method to students who are significantly below grade reading
proficiency.
To provide pre- and post-testing to each
participant to substantiate the success rate.
Where we work
This profile needs more info.
If it is your nonprofit, add geographic service areas to create a map on your profile.
Login and updateExternal reviews

Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of clients who become literate because of literacy education programs by the nonprofit
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
At-risk youth
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of children who are doing better in school
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
At-risk youth
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of children who gain confidence by becoming literate .
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
At-risk youth
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
The Literacy Project program goals are is to enable illiterate, second-grade children to catch up to their peers before the crucial third-grade literacy milestone. To prepare children's literacy skills to "ease into" rather than struggle with the Common Core Program Standards. To allow for the opportunity to participate STEM programming.
Providing early intervention at this crucial juncture is the cornerstone to increasing children's ability to graduate from high school thus producing self-sufficiency as literate adults.
How we implement Goals and Objectives:
• To target specific schools within OCDE, LAUSD, LBUSD, CVUSD and the RCOE districts with low literacy rates, demographically disadvantaged youth in Title I, "at- risk" and levels 3-5 schools of the Performance Improvement ("PI").
• To provide a highly cost effective learning method to students who are significantly below grade reading proficiency.
• To be user-friendly, easily comprehensible and increase the learning experience using proven, scientific methods.
• To provide Master Teachers as specialized administrators of the reading program.
• To provide pre- and post-testing to each participant to substantiate the success rate.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Program Strategies:
TLP brings literacy to their under-served children with low literacy rates, in Title 1, most disadvantaged schools of Orange, Los Angeles and Riverside counties free of charge.
Students, identified by their classroom teachers as those with the lowest literacy and reading comprehension skills, are referred to the program and placed into a small group of peers reading at similar levels.
Teaching is administered five days a week, during a six-week program cycle during daytime instruction. We conduct three cycles of teaching each school year (Fall: September – November; Winter: January – March, and Spring: April – June). Each cycle is administered by TLP Master.
Charting the progress of participating students increase in both academic and attitudinal scores are based upon pre and post-testing of the California Basics Phonics Skills Test (BPST) mode of learning, and the Garfield Reading Attitudinal Scale Study Program's measurable success rate. The assessment starts by pre-testing participants and a control group (considered a non-participant) at the start of each program; TLP uses the state standardized test methods mentioned above for both academic and attitudinal scores.
TLP collaborates with:
The Orange County Department of Education (OCDE), The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the Long Beach Unified Schools District (LBUSD) and the Riverside County Office of Education (RCOE).
The Angels Baseball Foundation, Readers in the Outfield Day, which benefits TLP and over 100 of our students from the Anaheim City School District.
Wienerschnitzel adopted TLP as nonprofit partner of choice and spearheaded a Southern California literacy awareness campaign.
Financial Strategies: We procure new funding earmarked for a district and target the schools and students that are rated 3-5 in the school district “Performance Improvement Plan" which means they are very low functioning schools.
Securing new funding also ensures the continued sustainability for schools already in our program by safeguarding funds reserved for those schools. Hence, our high success rate with sustainability; we do not employ taking from one source to pay for a new source.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
TLP's program has proven to be incredibly efficient, with literacy accomplished in a total of 30 one-hour sessions.
Students, identified by their classroom teachers as those with the lowest literacy and reading comprehension skills, are referred to the program and placed into a small group of peers reading at similar levels.
Teaching is administered five days a week, during a six-week program cycle during daytime instruction. We conduct three cycles of teaching each school year (Fall: September – November; Winter: January – March, and Spring: April – June). Each cycle is administered by TLP Master.
Charting the progress of participating students increase in both academic and attitudinal scores are based upon pre and post-testing of the California Basics Phonics Skills Test (BPST) mode of learning, and the Garfield Reading Attitudinal Scale Study Program's measurable success rate. The assessment starts by pre-testing participants and a control group (considered a non-participant) at the start of each program; TLP uses the state standardized test methods mentioned above for both academic and attitudinal scores.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
TLP has bridged the literacy gap for over 9,000 at-risk 2nd graders that are functionally illiterate.
TLP's program has proven to be incredibly efficient, with literacy accomplished in a total of 30 one-hour sessions.
By program end students score an average raised reading proficiency of 62.3-69.9%. Phonetic skills increase by 76% with overall improvement of 3/4 of a grade level, equivalent to seven months of classroom instruction.
Anaheim CA was the fifth most illiterate city in the nation. Two years after The Literacy Project was launched in 36 schools in Anaheim the city was raised to the sixth most illiterate city.
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
The Literacy Project Foundation
Board of directorsas of 08/27/2021
Mrs Sue Grant
The Literacy Project
Term: 2016 - 2019
Sue Grant
Chairperson
Dennis Kuhl
Chairman of Los Angeles Angels
Cindy Culpepper
Director / CEO of Wienerschnitzel
Paula Karcher
Director / Philanthropist Carls Jr.
Arnie Rubin
Director / Recently Retired Chairman of Funrise / Former Chairman of the Toy Industry Association & Toy Industry Foundation
Jim Steele
Director
Scott Lopez
Bank of America
Joe Stapleton
Penny Fox
Steve Tollefsrud
Retired / Philanthropist
Sinan Kanatsiz
CEO / KCOMM
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes