Juvenile Protective Association (JPA)
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Toxic stress severely affects children in high-poverty neighborhoods. It takes many forms and many children are affected by multiple causes such as family or community violence, incarceration, homelessness and hunger, and much more. Children affected by one or more Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs) have difficulty forming positive relationships, feeling safe and secure, and learning. As a result, they may often engage in bad or violent behavior or withdraw. More often than not, the symptoms of trauma children exhibit in class are treated simply as bad behavior and punished. Educators do not always see that they are trying to communicate their pain, and so a downward spiral begins that can lead to students' falling behind in school, permanently mistrusting others, and eventually dropping out or becoming embroiled in the very situations that had once affected them. As a result, the cycles of poverty and violence are recreated.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
C2K (Connect to Kids)
JPA’s Connect to Kids (C2K) program leverages teachers’ abilities to integrate social emotional learning into daily lessons and increases protective factors in the classroom and throughout the school community. C2K provides a framework and practical tools to help educators build positive relationships and increase protective factors for children impacted by poverty and disinvestment.
The overall goal of C2K is to teach educators how to be more responsive to the social and emotional needs of their students, enabling them to create bonds that will help those students feel, function and learn better. JPA therapists work directly with teachers, helping them gain insights into reasons for children’s disruptive behaviors and develop ways to approach them positively and productively. This helps teachers focus on dealing with the underlying causes of behavior in order to create a bond with the child which allows for the building of a trusting and positive student-teacher relationship.
New Light
Our in-office outpatient psychotherapy program, New Light, is located in the Lincoln Park neighborhood of Chicago. We employ highly skilled and expertly trained therapists to provide emotional support for people navigating challenges in all stages and walks of life. We provide child and adolescent, adult, parent-child, family and couples therapy.
At New Light, therapists meet with clients in a comfortable, confidential setting. Clients safely explore what's on their mind, sharing their stories, at their pace. Our therapists help people heal past hurts, gain clarity, improve communication skills, better handle stress, develop problem-solving techniques and overcome change and loss. We help people conceptualize, create, and sustain the lives they want to live.
We take a nonjudgmental stance. We respect our client's values, beliefs and right to self-determination. We help people foster insight and maintain their goals. New Light gives people the support and tools they need to thrive.
Treatment & Counseling
With the goal of removing barriers that keep kids from learning, JPA’s Treatment & Counseling Program delivers continuous and comprehensive school-based healthcare in the form of mental health services to children, educators and caregivers alike. These services include: 1) Relationship-based individual and small-group therapy for students affected by trauma and toxic stress referred to us by their teachers due to problematic behaviors or other factors, resulting in more than 60% of kids feeling and functioning better within their first year of treatment; 2) Therapist-led psycho-educational classroom groups for elementary and middle school children; 3) Connect 2 Kids: A program which teaches educators how to incorporate social-emotional learning into their daily lessons with the goal of building trusting and positive student-teacher relationships; 4) Extensive guidance to parents with children in treatment; and 5) Individual therapy for caregivers.
Where we work
Photos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of children with a source of ongoing care
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adolescents, Children, Preteens
Related Program
Treatment & Counseling
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Children in school-based individual therapy each year. Typically, 50% of our clients renew their services the following academic year with the average client remaining on our caseload for 2.5 years.
Number of clients who report general satisfaction with their services
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Teachers, Students
Related Program
C2K (Connect to Kids)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
These numbers reflect the percentages of teachers who reported that C2K had a positive impact on their overall classroom environment.
Number of teachers who report feeling prepared to address diverse student needs, including learning disabilities and limited English proficiency
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Teachers
Related Program
C2K (Connect to Kids)
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
These numbers represent the percentage of teachers who reported that C2K helped them better understand and respond to students challenging behaviors.
Number of people who received clinical mental health care
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth
Related Program
Treatment & Counseling
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Numbers are for children (pre-K through 8th grade) in individual therapy at their schools.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
JPA's primary goal is to help children under extreme stress learn to feel and function better so they can achieve personal and academic goals in the future, graduate from school on time and ready for the next stage of their lives, and break the grip of poverty.
According to the Child Mind Institute, ongoing exposure to neglect, abuse, homelessness or violence causes learning and behavior problems in children. Those as young as PreK show signs of extreme stress and anxiety, having experienced or witnessed incidents of violence. The lack of social services in these neighborhoods, including therapy, that help children deal with toxic stress and trauma, contributes not only to a loss of human potential, but also to major physical health problems in adulthood (Norman et al, 2012).
When children have significant emotional needs, behavior problems, and relationship problems, it negatively affects their ability to do well in school, relate to others, and positively approach their futures. Being young, they often lack the ability to verbalize or seek help for their concerns. As a result, they may act out in class as a way to get attention and deal with the pain they suffer, yet the teacher may react defensively or punitively, responding only to the behavior exhibited. This situation can result in the child's being removed from the class, and it has been shown that students who have been suspended from school can fall badly behind others in key metrics, such as reading skills.
Over 97% of JPA's young clients are African American or Latinx, qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, and live in high-poverty neighborhoods on the South and West sides of Chicago, incl. North Lawndale, Altgeld-Riverdale, Roseland, and Belmont Cragin, among others, where community violence is rampant, exposing these children to stressors that can overwhelm their brains and jeopardize their ability to learn, develop, and thrive.
Research shows that among children experiencing poverty who are in need of mental health care, <15% receive services, and even fewer complete treatment (Hodgkinson et al, 2017) . By meeting our clients where they are, in their schools and in their communities, we ensure they are able to easily access treatment, which is evidenced by the fact that JPA’s school-based services consistently see an 89% attendance rate.
Research also shows that “close relationships with teachers are associated with improved academic and socioemotional functioning among children with behavioral and demographic risk” (Sabol, T. & Pianta, R. 2011). C2K accomplishes this in communities where such progress is desperately needed and difficult to attain. By helping teachers form stronger, more positive relationships with students, C2K delivers significant growth toward mental health and classroom goals — for both teachers and students - while also reducing punitive and ineffective treatment of children.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
JPA's therapists are embedded in the schools where they work, although they are not part of the administration. They provide relationship-based one-on-one and small-group therapy for elementary and middle school children affected by toxic stress in high-poverty Chicago neighborhoods. Sessions occur weekly and continue as long as needed. By locating services in schools, we are able to reach many more children for a longer time than if they were required to go to a clinic, which would usually be outside the neighborhood and difficult to reach. Many students receive treatment for more than one school year.
Therapists/consultants also conduct classroom sessions for children about various topics of concern to them such as making friends, bullying, taking responsibility, and so on. Students are encouraged to participate for maximum effect.
JPA consultants introduce educators to the topic of toxic stress, how it affects children, and how to handle its symptoms when expressed in class. These topics are seldom covered in teacher education courses. Consultants work with teachers by conducting classroom observations that note how the teacher interacts with students and vice versa, meeting with them to discuss how those interactions went, and what might be done differently in the future. Teachers may ask the consultant to observe particular children as well. Consultations can be particularly effective because consultants are not part of the administration and therefore are not evaluating the teachers. They are there to help the teachers strengthen their abilities.
We also offer parent workshops that help parents understand stress and its expressions, how they can be "protective factors" for their children, and how they can maximize the positive factors of a parent-child relationship. In addition, JPA has recently begun to offer individual therapy for parents. The pandemic has disproportionately affected the communities we serve, resulting in the parents and caregivers of our clients coming to their child's therapist to help them work through the loss, illness, and isolation they have recently experienced as well as any intergenerational trauma that has been the result of years of social and economic inequality.
Finally, we constantly evaluate our work through periodic surveys that gauge children's progress, teachers' satisfaction with JPA programming, and other factors. By doing so we are able to improve each year.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
80% of JPA’s clinical team are either licensed clinical social workers (LSCWs) or licensed clinical professional counselors (LCPCs) and 20% are either licensed professional counselors (LPCs) or have their Masters in Social Work (MSW). The clinical team is supervised by our Senior Director of Clinical Services. This employee holds a LCSW (Licensed Clinical Social Worker with the State) and is sanctioned by the State to provide direct individual and group supervision for all clinical staff. He also has over 30 years of clinical experience including school based counseling, and he teaches graduate students in social work at Loyola University. All therapists providing school-based counseling receive weekly one-on-one supervision, participate in weekly Clinical Team meetings (which feature case presentations and outside experts) and are supported with internal PD and external professional development stipends.
JPA’s evaluation process is overseen by Stephen Budde, Ph.D. who has over 30 years of experience in child welfare as a clinical social worker, researcher, teacher, administrator, trainer and consultant. Prior to JPA, Dr. Budde was an Assistant Professor and Senior Researcher at Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. He also teaches research and child welfare courses at the University of Chicago Crown School of Social Service Administration. Dr. Budde directs special projects and evaluation activities at JPA, oversees expert permanency planning assessments, and provides consultation and training on mental health and child welfare practice and evaluation to public and private agencies.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Annually, JPA serves approximately 2,500 children, caregivers and educators throughout 20+ schools in 8 neighborhoods on the South and West Sides of Chicago.
Educators at our partner schools report that our work has greatly improved their ability to work with children and has changed the school culture for the better. In schools where we are also tracking reading ability, students in therapy have been found to do better than those not in therapy. We also found that students engaged in school-based therapy services with JPA have a 7% higher school attendance rate than CPS as a whole!
JPA's therapy services consistently exceed the following metrics each year: 60% of the children served show substantial improvement; 75% of the children served report they learned something valuable from small group therapy; 80% of the children served report that they enjoyed the classroom groups and learned something valuable; 60% of the parents served report using suggestions made by the therapist; and 80% of the parents have substantial conversations with their child’s therapist.
in addition, JPA's C2K Program has consistently exceeded the following metrics each year since the program's inception in 2016: 1) 70% of teachers will report Child Support Plans created in consultation with C2K consultant helped them build more positive relationships with their students; 2) 80% of teachers will report being satisfied or very satisfied with the support received from C2K consultant; 3) 60% of children will show substantial improvement as rated by their teachers; 4) 80% of teachers will report will report satisfaction with JPA’s classroom groups; 5) 75% of teachers will report C2K had positive impact on their approach to working with parents; 6) 65% of parents report having good or excellent relationships with the therapist working with their child. We also find that C2K increases teachers’ job satisfaction and reduces job-related stress by 65-75%.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Juvenile Protective Association (JPA)
Board of directorsas of 05/13/2024
Mr. Robert Johnson
Equity Commonwealth
Term: 2020 - 2022
Mr. Jordan Lamm
KPMG
Term: 2020 - 2022
Malcolm Kamin
Grumley, Kamin & Rosic
Mary Anne Bobrinskoy
Civic Leader
Joo Boe
Morgan Stanley
Connie Brohman
Dover Corporation
Bill Buhr
J.P. Morgan Private Bank
Ann Cohn
Civic Leader
Dan DeLoach
Infobright
Brad Holden
Holden Richardson
Jim Johnson
Apex Venture Partners
Nan Kaehler
Kaehler World Traveler
Moyra Knight
Astellas Pharma
Debbie Lamm
Civic Leader
Melissa Levy
Civic Leader
Greg Lunceford
Mesirow Financial Wealth Advisors
Leonard McLaughlin
Gallagher
Meredith Meserow
BHHS KoenigRubloff Realty Group
Josh Mintz
John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Christine Mooney
Northern Illinois University
Rob Moore
Marquette Partners, L.P.
Mark Osmond
Civic Leader
Cherie Pixler
Civic Leader
Bryan Robinson
Great Wolf Resorts
Doreen Rogers
Civic Leader
Jim Rose
Jones Lang LaSalle
Dieter Schmitz
Baker & McKenzie
Jim Sherman
Avionos LLC
Jim Stone
Stone Management Group
Steve Sutherland
Sidley Austin
Adam Woullard
U.S Anti-Doping Agency
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 05/19/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.