PLATINUM2024

Jeremiah Program

A world where single mothers and their children prosper

Minneapolis, MN   |  www.jeremiahprogram.org

Mission

Disrupt the cycle of poverty for single mothers and their children two generations at a time.

Ruling year info

1995

President & CEO

Chastity Lord

Main address

729 N Washington Ave Suite 600

Minneapolis, MN 55401 USA

Show more contact info

EIN

41-1801834

NTEE code info

Single Parent Agencies/Services (P42)

IRS filing requirement

This organization is required to file an IRS Form 990 or 990-EZ.

Sign in or create an account to view Form(s) 990 for 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Register now

Communication

Programs and results

What we aim to solve

This profile needs more info.

If it is your nonprofit, add a problem overview.

Login and update

Our programs

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?

Parent Programming

Through a suite of supports, JP mothers learn to own their narrative and to purposefully author their own futures.

· Empowerment classes are a pre-requisite for the Jeremiah Program. The goal of this 12-week virtual program is to create an experience for JP moms to reflect, learn, share, heal, and imagine as women, as moms, and as a community. Moms focus on resilience skill-building, intention setting, purposeful communication, deep listening, empathy, self-love, and critical thinking.

· Coaching provides personalized ongoing support to each JP mom. As mothers put their Empowerment lessons into action, including setting goals, planning her career, and moving through college, a dedicated coach is by her side. Coaching covers a wide range of topics, including positive parenting, housing support, financial management, mental health, interpersonal relationships, and time management.

· College or professional degrees are necessary for almost all new high paying jobs. All JP moms are working towards a degree; most are first generation students. JP coaches support them as they navigate the bureaucracy of higher education, decide on their college path, and build the groundwork for their career.

· Housing Support is vital for student parents. JP’s housing supports differ by geography. In Boston Massachusetts and Brooklyn New York, JP works with local housing programs and provide referrals to resources such as legal aid as necessary. In Austin Texas, Fargo North Dakota, and our Minnesota locations of Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Rochester, JP has housing units consisting of furnished, single-family apartments, with community meeting spaces. Mothers pay no more than 30% of their income in rent, eliminating a major stressor for single-income families.

· Community building starts with Empowerment and strengthens through on-campus events and classes. After graduation, JP participants stay connected to the community through our new alumni program, invited to our annual summit, and can chose to become JP Fellows.

Population(s) Served
Women and girls

Second Generation Education (2GED) is the programmatic area supporting second-generation early childhood education. JP believes that mothers should not have to make the untenable choice between investing in themselves and investing in their children’s educational developments. Each JP campus hosts, or partners with, a subsidized high-quality early childhood education center to prepare children to graduate kindergarten ready. Our centers prioritize parental involvement as a key driver of child outcomes and ensure that mothers are satisfied with the quality of care and education for their children.

Population(s) Served
Infants and toddlers

Graduation is a time of celebration for one’s accomplishments, but it is also a time of changes. JP participant moms stay connected to the community through our new alumni program and are invited to our annual summit.

We are engaging JP alumni to build ongoing programming for families that keeps them anchored through a network that grows with them across the post-graduation poverty continuum. In 2020, we launched our first JP Alumni Fellowship cohort. The JP Fellows are part of a selective, 12-month leadership program. The time commitment is about 20 hours per month and is a paid opportunity where JP fellows are equipped with relational organizing skills, opportunities to drive alumni programming, and recognized leadership at an annual Alumni Summit. Additionally, our fellows will walk away from their fellowship with tangible assets that they can use in their own professional career such as CRM experience, organizational skills, and access to an alumni network. In doing so, families will be supported through the critical post-graduation moments of their lives, while also serving as agents of change for new JP families.

JP moms are the authors of their own lives and the architects of their own futures. JP’s support enables moms to do bold things and to make meaningful progress towards the lives they want to lead. It is our goal that the JP experience will meet the moment we are in and provide life-changing opportunities for our moms and our kids.

Population(s) Served
Women and girls

Where we work

Awards

4-star top rating 2020

Parent Aware

Our results

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.

Number of individuals served (mothers & children)

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Women and girls, Infants and toddlers

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Context Notes

Individuals reached includes moms who participate in at least one Empowerment class and their children, as well as community children enrolled in CDCs.

Number of families served

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Women and girls, Infants and toddlers

Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Increasing

Context Notes

Families served includes any mom who participated during the given year, including moms who transitioned out during the year.

Goals & Strategy

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.

Charting impact

Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.

1. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE - GROW
Scale the Jeremiah impact through three key growth initiatives including:
A. Leverage current assets and pursue partnerships in housing and early childhood education in
existing campus communities
B. Expand the Jeremiah recipe of 2 Gen services to new campus communities leveraging partnerships,
particularly in housing and early childhood education
C. Expand thought leadership reach and influence to lead transformational change for 2 Gen programs

2. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE - PURSUE EXCELLENCE INNOVATION
Leverage lessons learned to drive maximum impact while maintaining the quality of services to families, and continue to innovate for future impact Initiatives include:
A. Test service product expansion of existing IP
B. Explore technology solutions

3. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE - MEASURE IMPACT
Invest in data collection to assess results, refine the program, and report out on Jeremiah’s impact through two primary initiatives:
A. Create an organization wide framework
B. Develop and test reporting system

1. Complete construction and open campuses in Austin (2016), Fargo (2017) and Rochester (2020) to serve an additional 95 families.
2. Expand partnerships to serve an additional 30 families in Boston.
3. Pilot innovative approaches in Minneapolis-St. Paul to serve an additional 115 families.
4. Streamline a new campus development process.
5. Target efforts at 10 selected Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) to build Jeremiah awareness, influence, and financial support and move three new communities into the development process for either a campus or partnership model.
6. Influence funders, public policymakers and other stakeholders, especially in the targeted MSAs, by effectively telling our success stories and outcomes.
7. Collaborate with mission-compatible groups on public policies to impact two-generational poverty at the local campus and national levels.
8. Assess human resource needs and develop and implement plans to meet leadership and staff requirements.
9. Assess and address facilities and system needs.
10. Develop a comprehensive measurement system to improve programming and prove outcomes.
11. Develop a comprehensive business plan that outlines financial and infrastructure requirements.

Jeremiah Program brings over 20 years of leadership in reducing generational poverty. We are advancing our model beyond Minnesota by using our strong track record of partnering with communities, organizing a cross-section of leaders, developing local advisory boards, and sharing best practices across campuses/locations.

The organization is managed by the President & CEO and headquartered in Minneapolis. The President & CEO, in collaboration with the National Governing Board of Directors, secures funding for expansion and initiatives that will help ensure program excellence at all locations.

Each campus/location is headed by an Executive Director and has its own Community Board of Trustees to support, fundraise, and provide strategic direction for that community. The Executive Directors and Community Boards of Trustees assume responsibility to manage their respective budgets and raise funds for campus program operations. Community Boards are focus on maintaining the integrity and strength of the local campuses in alignment with the overall vision of the organization.

As Jeremiah expands nationally, headquarters retains core programmatic tenants and outcomes that each campus adheres to; however, each site is encouraged and empowered to adapt programming based on its own site-specific needs and opportunities.

Jeremiah has a strong communication process to share best practices across its leadership network. The Governing Board has an expansion committee that is consistently seeking evidence-based practices and ideas for innovative strategies from across the country.

The Austin, TX, campus, with housing for an additional 35 families, opened in March 2017, adjacent to the duplexes that house 4 more families. The Fargo, ND/Moorhead, MN, campus with housing for an additional 20 families opened in December 2018. A campus with housing for 40 families in Rochester, MN was completed in 2020 and is nearing full capacity.

Jeremiah Program continues to attract national recognition for its successful two-generation strategy. Chastity Lord, President & CEO, serves on the board of Shriver National Center on Poverty Law and has been quoted as a thought leader in top-tier outlets including Reuters, POLITICO, CNN, The Boston Globe, The New York Times, Austin American-Statesman and NPR.

How we listen

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.

done We shared information about our current feedback practices.
  • How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?

    To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals

  • Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?

    We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded

  • What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?

    It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time, It is difficult to identify actionable feedback

Financials

Jeremiah Program
lock

Unlock financial insights by subscribing to our monthly plan.

Subscribe

Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more about GuideStar Pro.

Operations

The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.

lock

Connect with nonprofit leaders

Subscribe

Build relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.

lock

Connect with nonprofit leaders

Subscribe

Build relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.

  • Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
  • Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
  • Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations

Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.

Jeremiah Program

Board of directors
as of 03/13/2024
SOURCE: Self-reported by organization
Board chair

Aisha Barry

Advanced Sterilization Products

Term: 2023 - 2024

Melissa Goodman

Ciresi Conlin LLP

Sandy Santana

Children's Rights

Jeannine Balfour

Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies

Aisha Barry

Advanced Sterilization Products

Ethelind Kaba

Ann Bancroft Foundation

Jeremy Wheaton

ECMC Group

Inés Sira

WESCO-Anixter

Pamela Codo

Goldman Sachs

Aaron Mann

Kindeva Drug Delivery

Meredith Moore

Leverette, Weekes & Co, Inc.

Kadia Tubman

Business Insider

Mike Ruetz

Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies

C. Nicole Mason

Institute for Women's Policy Research

Monique Miles

Aspen Institute Forum for Community Solutions

Charity Elder

Adjunct Professor and Media Executive

Lauren Odell

Gladstone Place Partners

Olivia Peoples

The Bridgespan Group

Board leadership practices

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.

  • Board orientation and education
    Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes
  • CEO oversight
    Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes
  • Ethics and transparency
    Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes
  • Board composition
    Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes
  • Board performance
    Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes

Organizational demographics

SOURCE: Self-reported; last updated 3/13/2024

Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.

Leadership

The organization's leader identifies as:

Race & ethnicity
Black/African American
Gender identity
Female, Not transgender
Sexual orientation
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or other sexual orientations in the LGBTQIA+ community
Disability status
Person without a disability

Race & ethnicity

Gender identity

Transgender Identity

Sexual orientation

No data

Disability

No data

Equity strategies

Last updated: 03/13/2024

GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more

Data
  • We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
  • We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
  • We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
  • We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
  • We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
  • We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Policies and processes
  • We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
  • We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
  • We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
  • We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
  • We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
  • We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
  • We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.