Mara Elephant Project USA, Inc.
protecting elephants to conserve the Greater Mara Ecosystem
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our vision is to see a stable elephant population co-existing peacefully with people in the GME. As the human footprint has grown, the space for elephants and other wildlife diminished, putting the two in conflict. We aim to find solutions that promote co-existence by combatting habitat loss, conflict and providing protection for elephants, their habitats and the communities that call the Mara home.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Elephant Collaring, Monitoring and Research
Since 2011, MEP has deployed satellite collars on a total of 72 keystone elephants to track their movements. When paired with technology like EarthRanger, we can monitor at risk elephants in real-time and react when they are in danger. MEP has adapted over the last decade to focus on the co-existence crisis. In 2019, we launched the MEP Research Department to focus on monitoring elephants and evaluating the data to produce actionable outcomes that increase elephant protection. MEP launched a long-term monitoring (LTM) team to gather more field data on the entire elephant population living in the Mara, not just the collared elephants. The LTM team’s elephant monitoring has increased elephant protection by identifying injuries due to conflict early so a vet can treat the elephant. The long-term monitoring of an elephant population helps alert MEP to a resurgence in poaching, deploy rangers more efficiently and determine the makeup of the population, all to increase their protection.
Anti-Poaching Patrols & Rapid Response Units
To combat direct threats to elephants, MEP deploys 84 rangers alongside Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) who work tirelessly. These local men and women are the boots on the ground that prevent poaching, habitat destruction and promote co-existence. MEP has a vast intelligence network that alongside our government partners has been at the center of many arrests and seizures. Our anti-poaching patrols and intelligence gathering raises the opportunity cost for poachers and increases security for not only elephants but other wildlife. MEP’s well-trained rapid response ranger units mitigate conflict between elephants and communities to protect them both.
Conservation Technology
MEP is developing bespoke technology that has applications for global conservation. The data the MEP LTM collects on the Mara’s elephant population is being analyzed in a bespoke technology called ElephantBook, a system for human-in-the-loop elephant re-identification. Our system can be linked to EarthRanger which helps us efficiently monitor elephant populations and locations from elephant sightings in the wild. MEP also developed Ecoscope, an open-source analysis module for tracking, environmental and conservation data analyses. Ecoscope contains many of the tools needed to get from data collection to a finished report in a quick and easy streamlined workflow. The conservation tech we've developed can be applied globally to combat conservation challenges, and we're sharing it with other organizations.
Habitat Protection
MEP rangers protect critical habitats in the GME by combatting illegal logging and charcoal production and arresting culprits and confiscating assets. We work closely with partners in the Mau, Loita and Nyakweri forests to effectively use our boots on the ground to deter habitat destruction and monitor illegal activities by collecting them in EarthRanger to show trends over time.
We evaluate forest loss by taking Google Earth Engine’s satellite images and using Esri, a GIS mapping software, to compare the forest year-to-year to show forest loss over time. These actionable outputs are used to develop policy, guide demarcation of the forest and protect boundaries from incursions.
Co-Existence
MEP’s vision is to see a stable elephant population co-existing peacefully with people across the GME and in areas where they are struggling to exist in Kenya. There is a limited understanding of the complexity of crop raiding behavior because of the difficulty in obtaining detailed movement data from elephants that actively crop raid. Answering the “why” about crop raiding in elephants varies based on individuals, seasons, opportunity and more. Destruction of crops is economically ruinous to small-scale farmers and leads to harmful human-elephant conflict as elephants often sustain injuries while raiding and it stokes negative human perceptions leading to conservation challenges.
We launched the Co-Existence Farm to determine elephant selection for agricultural crop types in order to trial low-cost solutions to make a traditional subsistence farm elephant friendly.
Where we work
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Percentage of Illegally Killed Elephants (PIKE)
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Anti-Poaching Patrols & Rapid Response Units
Type of Metric
Context - describing the issue we work on
Direction of Success
Decreasing
Context Notes
PIKE = percentage of illegally killed elephants. This number is no longer released externally but used internally with stakeholders.
Number Rangers Deployed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Anti-Poaching Patrols & Rapid Response Units
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We work in partnership with the Kenya Wildlife Service. We have eight ranger units in total and all rangers are recruited from the local community and trained in house.
Number of Poachers Arrested
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Anti-Poaching Patrols & Rapid Response Units
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Since 2012, MEP alongside government partners has arrested 507 total ivory or bushmeat poachers, raising the opportunity cost for poachers in the Mara.
Kilograms of Ivory Seized
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Anti-Poaching Patrols & Rapid Response Units
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
All resulting in 2,428.65 kg seized.
Number of human-elephant conflict incidents responded to
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
As poaching declined, human-elephant conflict increased. We started tracking incidents in 2016 and collecting data on property damage and the effectiveness of our mitigation techniques.
Kilometers of chili fences built
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
38 km of total chili fences built and 540 farmers trained in how to maintain and build chili fences.
Number of Poached Elephants
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Anti-Poaching Patrols & Rapid Response Units
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Decreasing
Context Notes
MIKE = Monitoring of Illegally Killed Elephants, which indicates carcasses found and cause of death, we list poaching death only. We were proud to celebrate zero poached elephants in 2020 and 2021.
Number of Collared Elephants
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Elephant Collaring, Monitoring and Research
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
This reflects the numbers of elephants being monitored through the MEP, KWS and WRTI collaring program.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
MEP was developed to fill a gap in protecting elephants outside of conservancies and protected areas in the Mara. Elephants that are “safe” in the Mara have been in the formally protected Maasai Mara National Reserve and the informally protected conservancies. As a result, most of the illegal killing of elephants, and hence the work MEP does, is concentrated in an unprotected area of 11,500 km2 outside these areas. We aim to eliminate poaching in the Mara, build solutions that promote co-existence and see a stable elephant population co-existing peaceful with the people of the Mara.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Our approach is to Monitor, Evaluate & Protect, or the “MEP” Method. MEP deploys innovative techniques and technologies to monitor our four pillars of protection: elephants, habitats, communities and connectivity. MEP builds bespoke technologies that evaluate conservation data and produce actionable outputs to influence policy, landscape planning and deployment of resources. MEP deploys Kenyan rangers and researchers to protect our four pillars.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Since 2011, MEP has trained, deployed and managed over 70 community rangers and trained deployed and managed a vast intelligence network to combat poaching, habitat destruction and mitigate conflict. Our research department continues to grow and diversify in capacity to address the threats to elephants and their habitats. Adopting technology and remaining adaptable as an organization is key to achieving our goals. Expanding our fundraising efforts as well to find sustainable revenue streams will ensure MEP is here to secure a future for elephants.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Over the last decade, Mara Elephant Project’s approach of monitor, evaluate and protect has had a significant impact on the four pillars, elephants, habitats, communities and connectivity.
• Zero poached elephants in the GME in 2020 and 2021
• 462 total ivory or bushmeat poachers arrested
• 2,192 kg (4,833 lbs) of ivory seized
• Eight rapid response ranger teams
• Over 80 Kenyan men and women employed in conservation
• A cutting-edge research department
• A MEP Experimental Farm to find solutions to promote co-existence
• Movement data from 72 collared elephants
• Three field researchers mapping over 5,337 km (3,316 miles) of fences
• Over 1,000 snares removed, 700 kilns destroyed, 49,000 illegal posts, pieces of timbers and trees confiscated
• 857 conflict incidents mitigated
• Operating the only helicopter dedicated to wildlife in the GME
• Sponsored the education of over 100 staff member’s children
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Mara Elephant Project USA, Inc.
Board of directorsas of 11/06/2023
Marc Goss
Claire Bolles
Marc Goss
Jake Wall
Kevin Rodrigues
Erica Dillow
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 02/03/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.