Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Funding research into a rare, orphan disease afflicting mostly children called Niemann-Pick type C.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Fundraising
DART holds periodic fundraisers in Fairfield County, CT and then works with the Hide and Seek Foundation, Race For Adam Foundation, Ara Parseghian Medical Research Foundation and the National Niemann-Pick Disease Foundation to identify the best scientific research projects in hopes of finding a cure for Niemann-Pick disease Type C.
Support Of Accelerated Research for NP-C
In 2008, several NPC research foundations and NPC researchers from different backgrounds came together with the common goal of developing effective therapies for NPC disease and to initiate a clinical trial within a 3-5 year time frame. This became the founding principle of Support Of Accelerated Research for NPC (SOAR). The Collaborative, which is funded through NPC charity support, is composed of 3 internationally-recognized NPC scientists and a network of collaborators pursuing projects relevant to SOAR. SOAR has contributed to significant progress in developing a pipeline for NPC therapeutics and in the discovery of disease biomarkers to facilitate clinical testing.
General Research
In addition to its commitment to SOAR-NPC, DART also funds other important basic scientific research and translational medical research into NPC disease, both directly and in collaboration with other NPC foundations.
Where we work
Awards
RARE Champions of Hope – Collaborations in Science and Technology 2016
Global Genes
External reviews

Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsStrong initial funding for medical and scientific research
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Chronically ill people
Related Program
General Research
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
In 2020, with COVID protocols it was difficult to maintain research programs, but our labs did the best that they could do within restrictions.
Recruitung the most talented and experienced researchers and/or labs.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Chronically ill people
Related Program
General Research
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
DART partnered with the Ara Parseghian Medical Research Fund to fund two new programs for the development of potential therapies at Dartmouth College and and Cornell Medical College.
Volume of our pipeline and speed of progress toward milestones.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Chronically ill people
Related Program
General Research
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Number of companies interested in developing therapies for NP-C
Articles published in scientific or medical journals and citations to those srticles.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Chronically ill people
Related Program
General Research
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
There is a lot of robust research in NP-C that is peer reviewed and published.
Extent to which third parties invest in potential therapies from our funded research.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Chronically ill people
Related Program
General Research
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Our basic funding with our partners organizations provides the proof of concept necessary to more research forward on a larger scale.
Number of research collaborations and collaborators.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Chronically ill people
Related Program
General Research
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
DART has expanded the partners with which we fund NP-C research.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Find a cure Niemann-Pick type C disease.
NPC disease is a rare, fatal genetic disorder that results in progressive decline in motor and intellectual function of affected individuals, primarily children. The NPC community has benefited from incredible research by world-class scientists funded by charities including Dana's Angels Research Trust, the Ara Parseghian Medical Research Foundation and the National Niemann-Pick Disease Foundation. The effort continues supporting pivotal NPC research; research that may also help millions of people suffering from HIV/Aids, Ebola, heart disease, stroke, Alzheimer's disease and other disorders that appear to be related to cholesterol metabolism.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
DART and its SOAR collaborators are currently working with several different compounds at various stages of drug development. The drug pipeline was designed to generate maximum efficiency in moving promising drug candidates forward and to accomplish this, SOAR focuses on the following aspects:
-An open forum of discussion among SOAR scientists and affiliated labs to allow rapid identification of potential compounds to ameliorate NPC disease
-Discovery of biomarkers to provide critical tools for clinical drug evaluation
-Maintenance of several unique NPC animal models utilized for in vivo testing of compounds
-Complementary expertise among individual laboratories to provide a foundation for thorough analysis and evaluation of drugs of interest
-Actively seek out highly meritorious projects and additional collaborations aligned with the priorities of SOAR and aid in funding these pilot projects.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Central to DART's SOAR collaborative is a core of scientists from four internationally recognized NPC laboratories:
-Dr. Forbes Porter, NICHD/NIH
-Dr. Cristin Davidson, NHGRI/NIH
-Dr. Andrew Lieberman, University of Michigan
-Dr. Mark Schultz, University of Michigan
-Dr. Stephanie Cologna, University of Illinois, Chicago
-Dr. Charles Vite, University of Pennsylvania
These scientists maintain a close working relationship and function as a tightly integrated unit to allow for free scientific exchange. They work closely with an extensive network of scientific collaborators, including other intramural investigators at the National Institutes of Health [Therapies for Rare and Neglected Diseases (TRND), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)], other academic institutions, and pharmaceutical companies.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
While great progress has been made, the NPC community has yet to see its first FDA approved therapy. We are hopeful that Adrabetadex/cyclodextrin or Arimoclomol, each of which concluded FDA approved Phase 2/3 clinical trials in 2019 will be the first step in the creation of a drug cocktail that will work as a cure for NPC. Numerous additional therapies including gene therapy, are in our pipeline awaiting an opportunity to be tested clinically.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
We are regularly engaged with clinicians, researchers and other patient organizations about how we can better accelerate our mission.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
We reorganized our collaborative research approach and team.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Dana's Angels Research Trust
Board of directorsas of 02/22/2022
Mr. Philip Marella
Ms. Andrea Marella
Norman Bryn
Maria P Kessel
Christina Krauss
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
No data
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 02/04/2021GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.