Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
The Lawyers’ Committee is fighting for the future we deserve.
Learn how to support this organization
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Today, the challenges facing our nation are immense. The work of advancing justice is an ongoing responsibility under the best of circumstances; but at this critical juncture in history, the nation is witnessing unprecedented rollbacks of landmark civil rights achievements. Hard-won civil rights and protections—which have defined our sense of freedom and justice for decades— are being challenged in a way that we have not witnessed in recent times. Now more than ever, the mission and work of the Lawyers Committee is essential.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Voting Rights Project
The Voting Rights Project (VRP) works to ensure equal access to the ballot for all voters, especially racial and ethnic minorities who have been historically disenfranchised.
VRP’s work includes addressing barriers to voting and advancing voter protections through: strategic litigation at local, state and federal levels; convening the Election Protection coalition; preventing biased redistricting plans that attempt to dilute the voting opportunities and power of voters of color; and protecting and furthering voting rights through public education and advocacy.
Criminal Justice Project
The Criminal Justice Project (CJP) works toward equal justice through combating mass incarceration and confronting the ways in which racism impacts each stage of the criminal justice system.
CJP’s work focuses on challenging laws and policies that criminalize poverty; promoting access to justice and the right to counsel; and advancing accountability, transparency, and structural reform of the police and police departments.
Educational Opportunities Project
The Educational Opportunities Project (EOP) works to guarantee that all students receive equal access to educational opportunities in pre-K through 12th grade and in higher education.
EOP seeks to promote racial and ethnic diversity and integration in public education; ensure Black students and historically marginalized students of color learn in healthy, nurturing school climates and in environments free of racism and discrimination; and ensure Black students and historically marginalized students of color access meaningful, equitable, and culturally relevant opportunities to succeed in school.
Fair Housing & Community Development Project
The Fair Housing and Community Development Project (FHCD) seeks to increase housing opportunities for people of color and communities of color.
FHCD's priorities include combatting discriminatory zoning practices; challenging the displacement of low-income communities of color; supporting the growth of a durable, well-resourced, Black-led tenant movement; and addressing the intersection of housing and the criminal legal system.
Economic Justice Project
The Economic Justice Project engages in impact litigation and legal advocacy to ensure that communities of color can access opportunities and meaningfully engage in the economy to lead dignified lives free from discrimination. The project mainly seeks to address persistent inequality and high poverty rates faced by African American and other minority communities.
Digital Justice Initiative
The Digital Justice Initiative (DJI) works at the intersection of racial justice, technology, and privacy.
Predatory commercial data practices, discriminatory algorithms, invasions of privacy and disinformation disproportionately target and harm Black people and other people of color. DJI is working toward an inclusive, multiracial democracy in the United States where civil and human rights online are respected and grounded in an equitable civic infrastructure that is open, just, resilient, and trustworthy.
Where we work
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of pro bono hours contributed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Ethnic and racial groups
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
The Lawyers' Committee leverages the largest pro bono network in the nation. In 2022, we drew upon 115,000 pro bono hours valued at $91,389,393. Hence, a donor's return on investment is high.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
We stand on the front lines fighting to defend our nation’s founding principle – equality for all. Our goal is to ensure that Black people and other people of color have the voice, access, and power to make the promises of our democracy real.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is one of America's most impactful civil rights organizations today. With the support of a vast network of lawyers in the private bar who provide pro bono support, our staff use litigation, public policy, advocacy, public education, and other forms of service by lawyers to:
- Fight voter suppression and ensure equal access to the ballot box
- Promote a fairer criminal justice system and advance policing reform
- Address economic inequality
- Promote fair housing and community development
- Ensure access to equal educational opportunity
- Create safeguards against digital discrimination, privacy infringement, and algorithmic bias for users of color
For more than 60 years the Lawyers' Committee has utilized legal strategies inside and outside the courtroom to strengthen democracy and create a just America.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Our staff are leaders in their fields who bring decades of experience and expertise in voting rights, housing, education, digital rights and privacy, and worker's rights. Our staff consists of a dynamic group of lawyers, organizers, and support staff, who work together; hold a strong belief in the organization's mission; and bring a commitment to racial equity, diversity, and inclusion to their work.
Our partners include legal, advocacy, grassroots, and community organizations at national, state, and local levels. Crucially, we continue to leverage the support of a vast network of lawyers in the private bar to fuel our work.
The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is dedicated to supporting and advancing diversity within its workforce and board. Because our commitment to diversity and inclusion is inextricably linked to our pursuit of equal justice for all, we strive to work with a broad and diverse coalition of partner organizations.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
There are few organizations that have conducted more civil rights litigation than the Lawyers' Committee. In the last five years, key victories and initiatives that demonstrate our national impact include the following:
- Summer 2023 victory to stop states and counties from using unnecessary and burdensome requirements to disenfranchise Black voters in particular. Due to the intervention of the Lawyers’ Committee and co-counsel, the court has issued a preliminary injunction that stopped Georgia counties from enforcing a requirement in Georgia’s SB202 that stipulates that absentee ballots not be counted if a voter makes an error in filling in their birthdate.
- Providing key information to higher education stakeholders to ensure equal opportunity and access for all students following the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision overturning race-conscious admissions. The Lawyers’ Committee was the only civil rights organization to actively participate in the defense of the two cases the Supreme Court decided, and we presented oral arguments before the Supreme Court on behalf of a diverse group of students and alumni from UNC.
- Summer 2023 victory in which the Proud Boys were ordered to pay over $1 million for a racially-motivated attack on a historically Black church.
- Fall 2022 victory on behalf of the Beaumont Branch of the NAACP and a Texas voter who experienced egregious voter intimidation at a historically Black polling location.
- Fall 2021 victory in which the Federal Communications Commission levied a $5 million fine against two individuals who made robocalls targeting Black Americans in an attempt to scare and misinform voters for the 2020 election.
- The nonpartisan Election Protection program’s 866-OUR-VOTE hotline, which is convened and co-led by the Lawyers’ Committee, fielded a record number of calls during the 2020 election season.
- Spring 2019 victory on behalf of the City of San Jose and the Black Alliance for Just Immigration against the Secretary of the Commerce Department and the Census Bureau to enjoin the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census questionnaire.
- 2018 suit filed challenging the unconstitutional jailing of poor defendants in White County, Arkansas. This suit contributed to our Criminal Justice Project’s growing body of work to make tangible progress toward ending indigent incarceration and the criminalization of poverty.
- Winter 2017 victory in our challenge to a debtors’ prison scheme run by the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court (OPCDC) that fails to consider an indigent individual’s ability to pay court debts before jailing them. The ruling connects the OPCDC debtors’ prison scheme with its own pressing need to generate money and holds that any jailing of poor individuals without prior notice and an opportunity to be heard on their ability to pay violates the Fourteenth Amendment.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Board of directorsas of 09/22/2023
Co-Chair Joseph West
Duane Morris LLP
Term: 2021 - 2023
Co-Chair Danielle Holley-Walker
Mount Holyoke College
Term: 2022 - 2024
Nicholas T. Christakos
Eversheds Sutherland LLP
David Smith
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
James P. Joseph
Arnold & Porter
Michael D. Jones
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Edward Soto
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Adam Klein
Outten & Golden LLP
Michael Swartz
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
Teresa Wynn Roseborough
The Home Depot
Donald J. Rosenberg
Qualcomm
Tom Sager
Ballard Spahr LLP
Roscoe Jones
Gibson Dunn LLP
Naho Kobayashi
McGuire Woods LLP
Shira Scheindlin
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
Jane Sherburne
Sherburne PLLC
Lillian Hardy
Hogan Lovells
Kim Boyle
Phelps Dunbar
Wendy Richards
Miller Canfield
Harold Franklin
King & Spalding
Neil Steiner
Dechert
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? No -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No