Community Food Share
Fighting Hunger in Boulder & Broomfield Counties
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Hunger is a reality for one in eight people in Boulder and Broomfield Counties — that’s 12% of our neighbors.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Direct Distribution Programs
At Community Food Share, we’re more than a food bank — we’re a neighbor and a friend who’s been part of the fabric of Boulder and Broomfield Counties for decades.
About 25% of the food we distribute goes directly to families, seniors, and other individuals who struggle with hunger in our community. Our direct distribution programs include Feeding Families (our onsite pantry); Elder Share (food assistance for seniors); mobile pantries; and emergency food. For details, please visit www.communityfoodshare.org/get-food.
Partner Agency Distribution
We know that ending hunger in our communities requires collaboration. That’s why we not only provide food directly to families, seniors, students, and others, we’re also a hub — delivering millions of pounds of food a year to local partners to reach people in their communities. Because when we work together, we give more people access to fresh, nutritious food.
More than 40 non-profit organizations — including food pantries, schools, shelters, and multi-service agencies — receive food from Community Food Share at no cost. We create a network that comprehensively serves low-income families and individuals — because every dollar a Partner Agency saves on food can be directed to assistance with housing, healthcare, education, and other basic needs.
For a list of organizations that receive food from Community Food Share, please visit www.communityfoodshare.org/about-us/partner-agencies.
Where we work
Awards
2007 Hunger Champion Award 2007
Colorado Anti-Hunger Coalition
NOVA Award 2005
The Community Foundation serving Boulder County
Local Hero Award 2009
Naturally Boulder
Mighty Apple Award - for Produce distribution 2006
Feeding America
4 stars - the highest rating possible, for the 7th year in a row! 2010
Charity Navigator
Most Loved Local Charity 2019
Hulafrog Boulder
Affiliations & memberships
United Way Member Agency 1990
America's Second Harvest - Affiliate 1983
Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of people within the organization's service area accessing food aid
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Direct Distribution Programs
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Identify the most effective methods for decreasing food insecurity in Boulder and Broomfield Counties. Determine feasibility and set goals to reduce the number of people experiencing food insecurity.
Number of food donation partners
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Represented as percentages. Increase food resources to sustain necessary organizational growth. Specific goals and initiatives are to be determined each year, based on budget and planned activities.
Total pounds of food rescued
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Direct Distribution Programs
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Represented in millions.
Number of groups brought together in a coalition/alliance/partnership
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Partner Agency Distribution
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
Represented as Partner Agencies. Identify opportunities to increase efficiency and effectiveness in our network through collaboration.
Number of groups/individuals benefiting from tools/resources/education materials provided
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Direct Distribution Programs
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Decreasing
Context Notes
Represented as unduplicated number of individuals served. Identify the most effective methods for reducing the number of people experiencing food insecurity. *tracking method changed between 2021-2022
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Provide more access to fresh, nutritious food through local partners and its onsite and mobile pantries through optimizing efficiencies, diverse food sources, increased giving, collaboration, education, and advocacy.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Optimize the food distribution network through operational efficiency, collaborative partnerships, and participant-focused distribution models.
Source, develop, and manage resources to support our mission: food to meet the need, funds to sustain operations, data, and education to guide our decisions, and staff and volunteers to accomplish the work.
Improve food access: reduce the gaps in food access across our service area.
Amplify our community’s effort to eliminate hunger by (i) supporting organizations and programs that promote participant self-sufficiency, (ii) educating and influencing our community to take action, and (iii) affecting policy through advocacy.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Because we have been a part of the fabric of Boulder and Broomfield Counties since 1981, we have developed a rich network of partners, donors, volunteers, and supporters to help us achieve our vision of a hunger-free community. With over 40 Partner Agencies, 6,600 volunteers, and strong support form both corporate and individual donors, we have the financial capacity and people-strength to make great progress in eliminating hunger.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Our 5-year strategic plan was implemented in FY 2019; as such, we have not yet achieved all our desired outcomes. But the following timeline of activities shows what's next for us:
FY 2021 — SUSTAIN & GROW: use data to guide our decisions; understand participants' needs; increase funding; increase food donations; leverage resources through collaboration; improve internal cost efficiencies; move more food with less money (externally); improve nutritional balance; set public education goals
— RAMP UP: support/develop programs; develop education around data; improve centralized sourcing; reduce barriers for food access; develop educational programs
— RESEARCH & PILOT: identify focus areas in policy; evaluate partners; establish advocacy policies
— COMPLETED: Have the right people; collaborate via Food Security Network; understand barriers to self-sufficiency
FY 2022 — SUSTAIN & GROW: increase funding; support/develop programs; reduce barriers for food access; set public education goals; develop educational programs
— RAMP UP: identify focus areas in policy; evaluate partners; establish advocacy policies
— COMPLETED: use data to guide our decisions; understand participants' needs; increase funding; increase food donations; leverage resources through collaboration; improve internal cost efficiencies; move more food with less money (externally); improve nutritional balance; develop education around data; improve centralized sourcing
FY 2023 — All activities completed
Please find the graph of this timeline in our strategic plan, located at https://communityfoodshare.org/plan/.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Community Food Share
Board of directorsas of 03/20/2024
Debbie Hodge
Mile High 360
Term: 2022 - 2025
Barbara Keiger
NextFoods, Inc.
Josh Anderson
Dietze and Davis
John Klein
Medtronic
Jonathan Sackheim
Grounds for Promotion
Susan Boyle
Boulder Country Day School
Alex Cioth
Claremont Foods
Erik Rebich
DiNoci Natural Foods
Erinn Darby
FirstBank
Gladys Boza
Trimble Inc.
Jennifer Stepanich
Medtronic
Joanie Tanous
Oracle Corporation
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 03/20/2024GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.