Community Initiatives
In service to great ideas
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Sponsorships
Community Initiatives provides fiscal sponsorship to a wide range of programs involved in all areas of community efforts.
Where we work
External reviews

Photos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of fiscal sponsor applicants sponsored
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of people served by our nonprofit partners
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
We are a community of initiatives all seeking to contribute or create public good. Fiscal sponsorship enables our projects to concentrate on pursuing their charitable purposes while we handle the financial, management and organizational issues and provide a secure, reliable mechanism for donors. Our current fiscally sponsored projects benefit arts and culture, education, environment, health, human services, public affairs, and social justice goals.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Greg Colvin, in his groundbreaking book Fiscal Sponsorship: 6 Ways To Do It Right, identified six ways to structure a fiscal sponsorship relationship. Community Initiatives is open to using any of these models, but has found, in practice, that three models have served our fiscally sponsored projects most usefully. The most common model (about 90 percent of our projects) is the Direct Project, or “Model A" relationship, in which the project and Community Initiatives are legally considered one and the same: Community Initiatives receives assets on behalf of, and incurs all liability for, the project. Please see descriptions of “Model A," “Model B," and “Model C" project sponsorships. Note: the nature of a project's fiscally sponsored relationship with Community Initiatives is determined at the time of acceptance by our Board of Directors. To learn more about the policies that govern these relationships, please see our Mutual Expectations.
Community Initiatives follows the Best Practices of the National Network of Fiscal Sponsors (NNFS). The NNFS promotes the understanding and professional practice of fiscal sponsorship. While models and missions differ, the organizations that comprise NNFS share common questions and aspirations to ensure responsible use of the tool of fiscal sponsorship.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Community Initiatives provides a wealth of core services to its fiscally sponsored projects. Our current services include:
Fiscal Sponsorship
Tax-exemption
Programmatic oversight (Model A)
Finance
Accounts payable
Cash receipts
Financial reporting and analysis
Budget and cash flow management
Audit and compliance reporting
Financial consulting
Grants/Government Grants
Administration
Billing and tracking
Accounting
Grants consulting
Fundraising
Online donations
Event software
Brainstorming
Human Resources
Administration
Full benefits
Payroll and taxes
HR consulting
Communications & Marketing
Social Media and communications consulting
Marketing consulting
Project Insurance
Meeting Space
Strategic Planning
Legal Review & Referral
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
While our mission didn't shift, President and CEO Melanie Beene and Director of Fiscally Sponsored Projects and Philanthropic Services Prudy Kohler both retired. In the early years, they carefully guided Community Initiatives' transition from The San Francisco Foundation to a completely independent organization. During their eight years leading the organization, they diversified the portfolio of projects and services, grew the revenues and staff, and helped the organization to become a respected leader in the sector. At the end of the calendar year, Frances Phillips retired from the board and passed the chair position to Ruth Williams, Regional Director-West Coast for Single Stop USA. Having worked closely with Ruth for the past two years, we knew the board and organization were in excellent hands.
Leadership change can be daunting, especially when it's long-serving leaders. The Board realized the challenges and engaged in a thoughtful and lengthy search process, culminating in the hiring of President & CEO, Theresa Fay-Bustillos who joined the organization 2014. The Board purposely selected a candidate who was well-rounded with extensive leadership experience in the non-profit, philanthropic, and for-profit sectors and who was also a lawyer with experience enforcing civil rights and handling general counsel duties for a non-profit and corporate foundation.
In 2014, CI embarked on a Board-led and staff supported strategic planning process, to carefully plan the next phase of Community Initiatives' history. We realigned core functions to increase efficiencies and improve the coordination of services to projects, resulting in staff promotions and new hires. And, we refined and expanded our service offerings to include, for example, strategic planning, increased legal review, and marketing.
After we completed the strategic plan, we hired Ruth Williams as President & CEO in 2017 to execute and operate our strategic plan. Ruth has a long and deep relationship with Community Initiatives - she served as Board member for 8 years and Chair for 2 years.
Our fiscally sponsored projects and their wide and varied achievements continue to inspire our work. All of them serve the public good—some with large impact, and some with smaller, albeit important outcomes. Staff and Board feel fortunate to support the work of such inspirational and tireless visionaries, making it difficult to highlight the work of a few in this report. Thus, we encourage you to visit our website to learn more about the work of projects in addressing the challenging issues of our time and follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Community Initiatives
Board of directorsas of 08/31/2023
Mary Ann J. Fake
Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
Term: 2021 - 2022
Janet Camarena
The Foundation Center
Mary Ann J. Fake
Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
Dee Dee Mendoza
Abbas Moloo
Mutual of America Financial Group
Loren Pogir
Barbara Rhomberg
Kavanagh Rhomberg LLP
Maya Tussing
Fairlight Advisors
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
No data
No data
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 06/16/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.