The Red Door Project
The Red Door Project
EIN: 45-3729152
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
The Evolve Experience
In 2016, The Red Door produced Hands Up: 7 Playwrights, 7 Testaments, a set of autobiographical monologues by black playwrights that explore their feelings about the well-being of black people in a culture of institutional profiling, written in the wake of police shootings of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, and others. The Red Door’s work with Hands Up led them to partner with members of the Portland Police Bureau, with whose support they developed a new show called Cop Out: Beyond Black, White & Blue. These monologues, based on interviews with law enforcement officers, depict the lived experiences of cops of all ranks, many of whom live at the intersection of this complex conversation as officers of color. Over the following three years, the Red Door toured their productions throughout the Pacific Northwest to over 15,000 audience members.
Interweaving monologues from Hands Up and Cop Out, Evolve is a new performance experience that explores the relationship between law enforcement and communities of color. In the midst of profound conflict, Evolve challenges biases and takes this charged, complex conversation to a level that generates compassion and empathy. With the development of this new production came a shift in the Red Door’s focus, from performing for general audiences to presenting The Evolve Experience as a training module for criminal justice and law enforcement professionals that combines live performance and curriculum components. While there are many different kinds of training available to professionals in the criminal justice industry, what the Red Door offers is unique. Art has the power to affect people on a deep, emotional level, in a way that traditional classroom training does not.
Where we work
Awards
Best New Nonprofit 2012
Portland Monthly
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planHow we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time, It is hard to come up with good questions to ask people
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2020 info
5.10
Months of cash in 2020 info
13.5
Fringe rate in 2020 info
66%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
The Red Door Project
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The Red Door Project
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of The Red Door Project’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $80,639 | -$71,169 | $56,397 | $460,938 |
As % of expenses | 32.8% | -11.2% | 8.9% | 68.3% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $80,639 | -$71,169 | $56,397 | $460,938 |
As % of expenses | 32.8% | -11.2% | 8.9% | 68.3% |
Revenue composition info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $326,330 | $503,011 | $829,466 | $939,123 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 0.0% | 64.9% | 13.2% |
Program services revenue | 6.9% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 6.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 6.1% | 5.2% | 45.9% |
All other grants and contributions | 93.1% | 87.3% | 89.6% | 48.1% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Expense composition info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $245,691 | $635,172 | $634,018 | $674,479 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 0.0% | -0.2% | 6.4% |
Personnel | 45.4% | 36.0% | 47.7% | 38.5% |
Professional fees | 35.4% | 41.0% | 33.0% | 46.4% |
Occupancy | 1.2% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 1.1% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 18.0% | 21.9% | 17.3% | 14.1% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $245,691 | $635,172 | $634,018 | $674,479 |
One month of savings | $20,474 | $52,931 | $52,835 | $56,207 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $2,184 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $268,349 | $688,103 | $686,853 | $730,686 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 11.7 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 13.5 |
Months of cash and investments | 11.7 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 13.5 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 11.7 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 11.0 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $238,842 | $143,396 | $220,164 | $757,861 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $0 | $63,500 | $172,789 | $60,000 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $2,184 | $2,184 | $2,184 | $0 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 19.4% |
Unrestricted net assets | $0 | $98,367 | $154,764 | $615,702 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $0 | $108,529 | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $0 | $108,529 | $247,580 | $51,286 |
Total net assets | $241,026 | $206,896 | $402,344 | $666,988 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
CEO, Co-Founder, Artistic Director
Kevin Jones
Kevin E. Jones is the principal conjurer and co-creator of The Red Door Project. He is an award-winning actor and director who has performed on the stage and screen for more than 30 years. Kevin is also a communication, organizational, and diversity consultant with over 25 years’ experience working with private and non-profit organizations. His approach utilizes complex systems thinking, cognitive mechanics and organizational change theory. As Co-Founder, Artistic Director, and CEO of the Red Door, Kevin brings this big-picture thinking to every play, project, and consulting session. Kevin Jones’ work offers a new way to approach seemingly intractable issues in our hyper-divisive environment.
Co-Founder
Lesli Mones
In addition to being the co-founder of the Red Door Project, Lesli Mones is the co-founder and principal of Plural Consulting, an executive consulting company that focuses on breakthrough learning and development. For the last 20 years she's been helping business leaders develop the self-awareness tools that result in sustained behavioral change. Her approach is grounded in the beliefs that change is inevitable, growth is intentional and intelligent risk is essential to achieve one’s potential.
Lesli knows the world in which executives operate and has the experience to help them to learn, grow, and achieve the results they care about most. Through her direct communication and coaching style, she provides leaders with clear and actionable feedback that enables them to maximize and leverage their strengths and not be derailed by their challenges.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
The Red Door Project
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
The Red Door Project
Board of directorsas of 02/23/2023
Board of directors data
Lesli Mones
Kevin Jones
The Red Door Project
Constanza Romero
August Wilson Estate
Lauren Turner
Wacom Technology
Valerie Aitchison
Lawyer
Tim Fleischmann
St Mary's Academy
Sarah Schrott
Social Work
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 02/23/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.