Kim Center for Social Balance
Taking the mystery out of workplace gender equity
Kim Center for Social Balance
EIN: 81-4518651
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Gender Equity Wiki
The Gender Equity Wiki is an online resource designed to serve as America’s central repository for workplace gender equity information and resources. It combines features of Wikipedia and Yelp to include:
High-quality articles, services, and other resources women need to make good decisions about where, when, and how to work
Personal accounts that allow users to save their searches, and review and contribute suggested resources for others
Targeted education, information about resources, and mentorship/internship avenues for employers to implement in their companies
The impact of the Gender Equity Wiki lies in its ability to:
1) Address and serve the needs of enough diverse working populations to increase gender equity commitment at every socioeconomic level and cultural background
2) Increase all people’s understanding of workplace discrimination so women will be better equipped to navigate their environments, men can better contribute to solutions, and community and organizational leaders will recognize the economic and social consequences of failing to achieve gender equity
3) Help companies lay the groundwork for formal gender equity initiatives and normalize the trend in corporate culture
4) Generate and maintain high, ongoing levels of both community and corporate awareness and engagement to fuel the momentum that the gender equity movement needs to truly become embedded in our society
LEAPS™
The Kim Center is accelerating the achievement of equal status for all genders in the workplace using LEAPS™. Our signature initiative comprises three tools: 1) comprehensive Assessment reveals cultural and logistical equity barriers for employees at multiple intersections of marginalization, including race/ethnicity; 2) customizable Playbook coordinate timelines and efforts by all stakeholders; 3) national Accreditation holds all companies accountable to the same standards. Combined, these tools give employers the data, structure and support they have been lacking to make rapid cultural transformation. We are working with San Diego County, cities, and employers to scale LEAPS™ to the regional level to prove that a community can make measurable progress toward gender equity when organized and united.
Workplace Gender Equity Day
As a declaration of public unity, the Kim Center spearheaded Workplace Gender Equity Day so civic leaders can rally their communities around the need for change. Our goal is to have every city in the United States make this historic proclamation.
Thanks to collaborative efforts with the San Diego County Women’s Commission and other partners, eleven entities have given voice to their constituencies, including the State of California, eight San Diego cities, and the San Diego Democratic Party.
Gender Equity Collaborative
Employing organizations and agencies from multiple sectors and industries cooperate locally and connect nationally to share resources that promote workplace gender equity. They pledge to CARE about workplace gender equity, SHARE resources to support the mission, and DARE to make change.
Where we work
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Financials
Revenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
222.17
Months of cash in 2023 info
8.7
Fringe rate in 2023 info
9%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Kim Center for Social Balance
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
This snapshot of Kim Center for Social Balance’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $102,128 | -$13,919 |
As % of expenses | 86.6% | -6.8% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $102,128 | -$13,919 |
As % of expenses | 86.6% | -6.8% |
Revenue composition info | ||
---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $212,470 | $191,769 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 0.0% | -9.7% |
Program services revenue | 40.4% | 24.9% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 17.9% | 12.4% |
All other grants and contributions | 41.7% | 62.7% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Expense composition info | ||
---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $117,976 | $205,688 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 74.3% |
Personnel | 35.0% | 60.2% |
Professional fees | 65.0% | 39.7% |
Occupancy | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $117,976 | $205,688 |
One month of savings | $9,831 | $17,141 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $127,807 | $222,829 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|
Months of cash | 17.8 | 8.7 |
Months of cash and investments | 17.8 | 8.7 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 18.0 | 9.5 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|
Cash | $175,048 | $149,917 |
Investments | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $1,875 | $13,600 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $0 | $0 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 0.1% | 0.5% |
Unrestricted net assets | $176,700 | $162,781 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $0 | $0 |
Total net assets | $176,700 | $162,781 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Dr. Hei-ock Kim
Dr. Hei-ock Kim has spent 12 years in nonprofit administration for social justice and environmental conservation, and 30+ years as an educator. Her former career as a classical pianist further fuels her entrepreneurship, leadership, discipline, and collaborative skills.
Dr. Kim serves on the board of Workforce Ventures, increasing workforce participation through income share agreements. She is also a member of San Diego’s Women’s Commission, MANA, Women in Public Finance, and Lawyers Club. Dr. Kim is frequently called on as a workplace gender equity expert, including for San Diego Councilmember Barbara Bry and KPBS public radio.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Kim Center for Social Balance
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
Kim Center for Social Balance
Board of directorsas of 07/23/2024
Board of directors data
Sarah Hassaine
ResMed
Term: 2024 - 2027
Tom Lemmon
San Diego Building Trades Council (Retired)
Sarah Hassaine
ResMed
Norma Jasso
San Diego Gas & Electric (Retired)
Nancy Mancilla
ISOS Group
Adriana Brunner
MyPoint Credit Union
Adrianna O'Donnell
San Ysidro Health
Linda Kavanagh
Cox Communications (Retired)
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 07/13/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.