The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
EIN: 52-1545522
as of November 2023
as of November 13, 2023
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Legal Assistance Project (LAP)
Through LAP, our attorneys and network of volunteer lawyers and paralegals assist clients on a broad range of civil legal issues. Volunteers assist clients via phone and at community sites such as dining programs, and a shelter-based medical clinic, providing the legal assistance necessary to help these clients address the issues that keep them mired in homelessness. LAP allows us to tap the generosity of the DC legal community and, each year, leverage millions of dollars in donated legal services.
Homeless Services Advocacy (HSA)
The Legal Clinic advocates in various fora to assure that the District of Columbia's homeless services system adequately meets the need of its intended beneficiaries. This includes advocacy around the District's hypothermia shelter and services, as well as advocacy around the shelter system's capacity and funding.
Project Link Up
Individual representation and broader advocacy efforts on behalf of families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness, including linking families to supportive and social services
Where we work
Awards
External reviews

Videos
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
a. Enhance Access to Justice
Goals: 1) Break down barriers to access to justice by making legal services easily accessible to homeless clients; 2) provide legal representation that clients need to challenge: shelter denials and expulsions; adverse decisions regarding disability benefits; disability discrimination; terminations of public assistance and more.
b. Improve Homeless Services We expect that our work in the homeless family arena will continue to have several focal points: the intake process for families; year round access to shelter; hypothermia shelter; expanding exit strategies beyond Rapid Rehousing; and the potential closure of shelters. With a new administration and some new councilmembers coming into office in early 2015, we will also work to educate these officials about the needs of our clients.
i. Intake: Goals: 1) Families are treated lawfully and offered the services they need when they apply for shelter; 2) New coordinated entry project meets the needs of single adults and connects them to proper supports.
ii. Year-round Access to Shelter: Goal: Families will get access to shelter when they need it, not only when whether is freezing.
iii. Hypothermia Shelter: Goals: 1) The Winter Plan will be realistic and will identify adequate resources; 2) The system will operate lawfully; 2) there will be adequate capacity to meet the need.
iv. Exit Strategies: Goal: Assure that families who leave shelter are securing stable placements, not simply short-term stop gaps that might ultimately put them in greater harm's way.
v. Possible Shelter Closures: Goal: Assure that no shelter is closed down without sufficient new shelter and housing available to meet the needs of residents.
c. Prevent Homelessness by preserving and expanding Affordable Housing
Goal: Help low-income tenants remain secure in their housing.
d. Right to Housing
Goals: 1) incorporate elements of international human right to housing into local housing advocacy efforts; 2) strengthen capacity of the legal services community by expanded use of pro bono counsel in such efforts.
e. End Criminalization of Homelessness
Goal: Improve interactions between law enforcement and people who are homeless, by enhancing officers' knowledge of issues and the resources available to assist homeless clients.
f. Community Legal Needs Assessment
Goals: 1) Provide opportunity for low income residents to I.D. the challenges they face, both the legal problems they face individually and the broader challenges faced by their communities (e.g. lack of access to transportation; food desert; environmental hazards; unaffordable housing; lack of employment opportunities); 2) as a legal services community, assess how we are responding to the needs as our client community articulates them.
g. Client Voice
Goals: 1) Educate clients about their rights; 2) Help clients understand the DC government processes and how to be an advocate within those processes
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
a. Enhance Access to Justice
Strategy: Serve individual clients through both our in-house attorneys and volunteers, who staff 7 community intake sites on a weekly basis.
b. Improve Homeless Services
i. Intake: Strategy - Monitor the centralized intake process for family shelter, to assure that families are treated lawfully and are not “diverted" from shelter to potentially unsafe or unlawful situations.
ii. Year-round Access to Shelter- Strategy: Advocate with mayor and DC Council
iii. Hypothermia Shelter - Strategy: Participate in development of Winter Plan; monitor DC's compliance with law and analyze need vs. capacity of shelter during winter months; conduct outreach at family shelter intake to inform families of their rights; represent families whose rights are violated.
iv. Exit Strategies - Strategy: Advocate for additional permanent affordable resources for families presently in shelter; monitor use of the LRSP vouchers to assure that they used in a timely way, etc.
v. Possible Shelter Closures - Strategy: Continue participation in task force on future of Federal City Shelter; work with families at the DC General Family Shelter to make sure that their views and needs are factored in to the conversations about the future of that shelter; monitor other shelters that are near impending development and assess whether and what sort of action might be needed to protect residents.
c. Prevent Homelessness by preserving and expanding Affordable Housing
Strategy: Represent tenant associations fighting to maintain their buildings as affordable; advocate for housing policies that meet the needs of clients; work for reform and improvement in housing agency operations.
d. Right to Housing
Strategy: Incorporate International Human Right to Housing principles into ongoing advocacy; engage more pro bono lawyers in housing advocacy; collaborate with other legal service and advocacy organizations.
e. End Criminalization of Homelessness
Strategy: Continue “Homelessness 101" training of law enforcement officers.
f. Community Legal Needs Assessment
Strategy: Participate in ongoing collaborative effort to conduct surveys of low-income DC residents about their legal needs. Participate in data analysis. Engage in planning based on survey results.
g. Client Voice:
Strategy: Conduct "know your rights" trainings in community settings (focusing on issues such as disability rights; rights and responsibilities under the Homeless Services Reform Act; and tenants' rights and responsibilities in permanent supportive housing). Support clients and other shelter residents and community members in their advocacy efforts, e.g. through holding advocacy trainings and testimony prep workshops.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
The Legal Clinic has a highly skilled and long tenured staff that is respected throughout the local legal services and pro bono community. Our most senior attorneys not only mentor our own network of 350+ volunteers, but they are looked to for strategic guidance and support by attorneys throughout the community, as well. Our volunteer network allows us to expand our capacity to reach broadly and deeply into the community, to be present to our clients when they need us most. Last year, our volunteers contributed more than $4.4 million in donated legal services.
The work of our staff members has been recognized and honored by a wide range of organizations. Executive Director Patricia Mullahy Fugere has been honored by the DC Bar with its William J. Brennan, Jr. Award for her service in the public interest; by the Legal Aid Society of DC as a Servant of Justice; by the DC Bar Foundation with its Jerrold Scoutt Prize; by the Gray Panthers of Metro Washington with its Geraldine Brittain Award; and the District Alliance for Safe Housing with its Keystone Award for Leadership in the Development of Safe Housing for Victims of Domestic Violence. Patty holds honorary degrees from the Georgetown University Law Center and Kings College.
Staff Attorney Scott McNeilly was honored by the DC Bar Foundation in 2004 with the Jerrold Scoutt Prize, recognizing his outstanding work on behalf of our clients.
Staff Attorney Marta Beresin was honored in 2013 by SHARC (Shelter, Housing and Respectful Change) for her “deep commitment to and outstanding legal support for Washington DC's homeless." Along with Legal Clinic attorney Amber W. Harding, Marta also received the Professional Women In Advocacy 2013 Award for Excellence in a State Advocacy Campaign.
In 2007, Staff Attorney Amber Harding received the Citizen Advocate award from the DC Center for Independent Living. In 2011, her work on improving the accessibility of emergency shelters was cited as a “particularly noteworthy" example of a successful reform campaign by the Shriver Center's Federal Practice Manual for Legal Aid Attorneys. Amber recently was honored by SHARC (Shelter, Housing and Respectful Change) for her “deep commitment to and outstanding legal support for Washington DC's homeless." Along with Legal Clinic attorney Marta Beresin, Amber also received the Professional Women In Advocacy 2013 Award for Excellence in a State Advocacy Campaign.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2022 info
30.10
Months of cash in 2022 info
13.6
Fringe rate in 2022 info
18%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
Financial trends analysis Glossary & formula definitionsFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
This snapshot of The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | -$128,100 | -$13,299 | $104,986 | $875,589 | $168,325 |
As % of expenses | -7.0% | -0.7% | 5.7% | 51.7% | 9.4% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | -$133,152 | -$18,018 | $100,730 | $871,197 | $163,570 |
As % of expenses | -7.3% | -0.9% | 5.5% | 51.3% | 9.1% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $1,170,368 | $2,249,963 | $1,639,761 | $2,943,831 | $1,935,763 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -27.3% | 92.2% | -27.1% | 79.5% | -34.2% |
Program services revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 99.5% | 99.6% | 99.9% | 80.0% | 93.2% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.5% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $1,823,134 | $1,914,768 | $1,840,940 | $1,693,544 | $1,791,617 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 4.2% | 5.0% | -3.9% | -8.0% | 5.8% |
Personnel | 88.2% | 85.1% | 86.4% | 90.6% | 87.7% |
Professional fees | 2.1% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 2.2% | 2.9% |
Occupancy | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 9.6% | 13.7% | 12.3% | 7.2% | 9.4% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $1,828,186 | $1,919,487 | $1,845,196 | $1,697,936 | $1,796,372 |
One month of savings | $151,928 | $159,564 | $153,412 | $141,129 | $149,301 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $264,000 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $19,311 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $1,980,114 | $2,079,051 | $2,017,919 | $2,103,065 | $1,945,673 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 6.6 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 9.9 | 13.6 |
Months of cash and investments | 6.6 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 9.9 | 13.6 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 9.7 | 10.3 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $1,002,720 | $439,964 | $790,773 | $1,392,992 | $2,027,304 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $125,671 | $1,015,793 | $703,203 | $1,068,192 | $587,044 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $160,652 | $161,507 | $136,886 | $106,901 | $106,901 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 95.8% | 98.2% | 86.9% | 83.9% | 88.4% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 5.9% | 4.2% | 19.9% | 1.8% | 2.5% |
Unrestricted net assets | $431,562 | $413,544 | $514,274 | $1,385,471 | $1,549,041 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $764,518 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $764,518 | $1,118,205 | $795,489 | $1,169,468 | $1,131,322 |
Total net assets | $1,196,080 | $1,531,749 | $1,309,763 | $2,554,939 | $2,680,363 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Ms. Amber W. Harding Esq.
Amber W. Harding has devoted her legal career to housing justice as a member of the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless staff for the past 20 years and was appointed Executive Director in November 2022. Immediately before her appointment as Executive Director, Amber served as the Director of Policy and Advocacy, where she was a primary spokesperson for the Legal Clinic. Amber joined the Legal Clinic as an Equal Justice Works Fellow shortly after receiving her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. She later founded and directed the David M. Booth Disability Rights Initiative at the Legal Clinic.
Through individual representation and systemic campaigns, Amber has advocated for the civil and legal rights of people experiencing homelessness; equal access to emergency shelter and housing: disability-rights compliance (particularly in emergency shelters); deeply affordable housing; right to shelter in severe weather; and removing barriers to housing.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, Inc.
Board of directorsas of 11/08/2023
Board of directors data
Mr. James E. Rocap
Steptoe & Johnson
James E. Rocap
Steptoe & Johnson
John R. Jacob
Akin Gump
Ericka Aiken-Adams
Wilmer Hale
Valerie E. Ross
ArentFox Schiff
Alan L. Banks
Friendship Place
Tyrone Chisholm, Jr.
Laurie B. Davis
Jon-Michael Dougherty
Gilbert LLP
Jennifer C. Everett
Jones Day
Nkechi Feaster
Service to Justice
Wesley R. Heppler
Susan M. Hoffman
Crowell & Moring
Sterling Howard
Lawyers for Good Government
John R. Jacob
Akin Gump
William Leahy
Apple
John T. Monahan
Georgetown University
Anita Puri
Accenture Federal Services
David E. Rogers
Winston & Strawn
Tiana Russell
Crowell & Moring
Jeff Schwaber
Stein, Sperling
Marsha Tucker
Arnold & Porter
David Wittenstein
Daniel I. Wolf
Gilbert, LLP
Michelle D. Coleman
Crowell & Moring
Henri Makembe
Do Big Things
Nicholas Pastan
Covington & Burling LLP
Kristen Reilly
Combs & Taylor LLP
Cathy Solomon
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? No -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Professional fundraisers
Fiscal year endingSOURCE: IRS Form 990 Schedule G