University Lab Partners
Enabling life science innovators by providing resources and a network of technical, business, and talent resources.
University Lab Partners
EIN: 84-1790343
as of November 2023
as of November 13, 2023
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Life Science Startup Incubation
University Lab Partners (ULP) is an independent, non-profit 501c3 project of Beall Family Foundation located in UCI Research Park opened in 2019. ULP strives to drive regional economic development and job creation by providing state-of-the-art wet lab facilities and the benefits of peer-to-peer interactions among a life science-focused entrepreneurial community that is developing cutting-edge medical innovations, saving and improving human lives. ULP offers exceptional value to life science entrepreneurs looking to launch and grow their businesses in the biomedical industry with no IP or equity claims.
Life Science STEM Workforce Development
University Lab Partners (ULP) is committed to making STEM careers accessible to all individuals, especially underserved students. To achieve this goal, the organization has developed and implemented various educational programs that engage students at all stages of their career paths. These programs provide real-world experience and the essential skills necessary for success in the biotechnology industry. Some of ULP's initiatives include Industry Chats, Hands-on Laboratory Courses, Digital Credentials, Medical Innovation, Research, and Entrepreneurship, and Paid Internships, all designed to engage students from high school to work professionals. By promoting inclusivity and diversity, ULP is helping to develop the next generation of STEM leaders who will drive innovation and make a positive impact in the world.
Where we work
Affiliations & memberships
The President's Volunteer Service Award - Certifying Organization 2022
External reviews

Photos
Videos
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2022 info
0.16
Months of cash in 2022 info
2.5
Fringe rate in 2022 info
17%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
University Lab Partners
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
This snapshot of University Lab Partners’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $2,070,696 | $932,041 | $45,794 | $602,115 |
As % of expenses | 313.2% | 37.4% | 1.2% | 14.2% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $2,070,696 | $624,372 | -$291,481 | $238,497 |
As % of expenses | 313.2% | 22.3% | -7.2% | 5.2% |
Revenue composition info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $2,731,807 | $3,423,011 | $3,756,700 | $4,846,235 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 25.3% | 9.7% | 29.0% |
Program services revenue | 0.0% | 45.6% | 90.3% | 94.5% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 23.4% | 8.1% | 3.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 100.0% | 31.0% | 1.6% | 2.5% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Expense composition info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $661,111 | $2,490,970 | $3,710,906 | $4,244,120 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 276.8% | 49.0% | 14.4% |
Personnel | 9.4% | 15.4% | 11.9% | 17.5% |
Professional fees | 33.6% | 35.6% | 46.3% | 36.5% |
Occupancy | 5.9% | 40.6% | 34.9% | 38.9% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 51.1% | 8.4% | 6.8% | 7.1% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $661,111 | $2,798,639 | $4,048,181 | $4,607,738 |
One month of savings | $55,093 | $207,581 | $309,242 | $353,677 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $44,000 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $2,652,589 | $334,755 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $3,368,793 | $3,340,975 | $4,401,423 | $4,961,415 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 3.4 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
Months of cash and investments | 3.4 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | -10.6 | 0.1 | -0.7 | 0.8 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $184,619 | $510,359 | $158,663 | $887,602 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $77,292 | $289,425 | $97,912 | $96,629 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $2,652,589 | $2,987,344 | $3,257,500 | $3,357,130 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 10.3% | 19.8% | 30.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 32.1% | 26.3% | 24.2% | 69.7% |
Unrestricted net assets | $2,070,696 | $2,695,068 | $2,403,587 | $2,642,084 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total net assets | $2,070,696 | $2,695,068 | $2,403,587 | $2,642,084 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Karin Koch
Karin Koch is an experienced leader in public service with a demonstrated history of working in local government administration and economic development. Starting her career out in public service by providing direct social services as a child welfare social worker, she transitioned into the management of local economic and workforce development programs for the County of Orange, overseeing the U.S. Economic Development Administration’s Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2019-2023 and Business Services for the Orange County region. After 11 years of public service, she joined the Beall Family Foundation in 2019 to serve as the Executive Director of University Lab Partners (ULP), the first nonprofit life sciences wet lab incubator in Orange County, California, enabling life science innovation through access to state-of the-art research capabilities and a network of technical and business resources.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
University Lab Partners
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
University Lab Partners
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
University Lab Partners
Board of directorsas of 10/27/2023
Board of directors data
Kenneth Beall
University Lab Partners
Gregory A Bohdan
Bohdan Corps.
John Gerace
Diasorin Molecular LLC
Hareem Maune
Applied Materials, Inc.
Michael Rakestraw
Independent Advisor
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Not applicable -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Not applicable -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Not applicable -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Not applicable -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Not applicable
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 03/21/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Contractors
Fiscal year endingProfessional fundraisers
Fiscal year endingSOURCE: IRS Form 990 Schedule G