PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE
EIN: 91-1285783
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Soundkeeper
PSA reviews National Pollution Discharge Permits, checks for compliance, and files citizen's lawsuits when not in compliance. PSA works to regulate storm water pollution and patrols and monitors the waters of Puget Sound in order to detect, document and report sources of illegal pollution.
Outreach
PSA has developed and maintains a redesigned web page and printed materials for outreach and education. The target audience is students, agency personnel, foundations and the general public, including recreational boaters.
Pollution Prevention
PSA prevents pollution by working with businesses, boaters and residents to reduce harmful pollution.
Where we work
Affiliations & memberships
Waterkeeper Alliance - Founding Member 1990
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of volunteers
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Adolescents, Children, Preteens
Related Program
Pollution Prevention
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Due to Covid-19 public health restrictions, Puget Soundkeeper temporarily suspended large volunteer cleanup events in 2020.
Number of pounds of marine debris removed from Puget Sound shorelines and waterways
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Adolescents, Children, Preteens
Related Program
Pollution Prevention
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Decreasing
Number of public events held to further mission
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Related Program
Pollution Prevention
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Cleanup events
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planHow we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
Puget Soundkeeper regularly surveys its constituents to optimize program delivery.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We act on the feedback we receive, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2020 info
4.17
Months of cash in 2020 info
9.8
Fringe rate in 2020 info
21%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $194,174 | -$110,254 | $142,732 | $158,723 | -$91,680 |
As % of expenses | 19.3% | -8.7% | 10.2% | 11.9% | -7.0% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $191,206 | -$114,494 | $138,613 | $154,225 | -$94,934 |
As % of expenses | 18.9% | -9.0% | 9.9% | 11.5% | -7.2% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $1,165,406 | $1,220,248 | $1,503,605 | $1,432,873 | $1,240,339 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 4.6% | 4.7% | 23.2% | -4.7% | -13.4% |
Program services revenue | 2.3% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 14.3% | 12.7% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 1.6% | 1.9% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 4.5% |
All other grants and contributions | 94.7% | 96.1% | 94.3% | 79.5% | 82.7% |
Other revenue | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $1,008,137 | $1,270,307 | $1,395,423 | $1,334,675 | $1,312,365 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | -6.2% | 26.0% | 9.8% | -4.4% | -1.7% |
Personnel | 72.4% | 72.1% | 68.2% | 64.8% | 66.0% |
Professional fees | 7.0% | 11.8% | 15.7% | 14.4% | 16.2% |
Occupancy | 6.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% | 5.6% | 6.4% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 14.4% | 11.0% | 11.4% | 15.2% | 11.5% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $1,011,105 | $1,274,547 | $1,399,542 | $1,339,173 | $1,315,619 |
One month of savings | $84,011 | $105,859 | $116,285 | $111,223 | $109,364 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $6,831 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $1,101,947 | $1,380,406 | $1,515,827 | $1,450,396 | $1,424,983 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 9.6 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 9.8 |
Months of cash and investments | 11.3 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 9.8 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 8.8 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 8.4 | 7.7 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $806,634 | $791,620 | $907,929 | $1,021,507 | $1,073,327 |
Investments | $144,165 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $20,388 | $101,983 | $104,062 | $105,084 | $129,189 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $37,782 | $37,782 | $38,207 | $38,207 | $38,207 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 45.2% | 56.4% | 64.0% | 75.7% | 84.3% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 8.6% | 7.6% | 8.1% | 9.1% | 20.9% |
Unrestricted net assets | $763,807 | $649,313 | $787,926 | $942,151 | $847,217 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $161,355 | $221,550 | $187,000 | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $161,355 | $221,550 | $187,000 | $126,475 | $146,129 |
Total net assets | $925,162 | $870,863 | $974,926 | $1,068,626 | $993,346 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Soundkeeper & Executive Director
Sean Dixon
Sean is a former Senior Attorney at Hudson Riverkeeper and most recently worked as Chief of Staff for the Region 1 (New England) office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Through his work as an advocate and a public official, he has monitored waterfronts on boat patrols, led coastal clean ups, built consensus around novel water permitting approaches, pushed for community-led remediation of legacy industrial sites, and supported the work of frontline communities fighting for equitable access to clean, thriving waterways.
Sean holds an LL.M. in Climate Change Law and a J.D. in Environmental Law from the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, in White Plains, NY; a master’s degree from the Yale School of the Environment; and a B.A. in Marine Biology and Oceanography from Boston University. He has served as Membership Officer and Council Member for the American Bar Association’s Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Law.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE
Board of directorsas of 01/19/2023
Board of directors data
Patricia Baird
Advanced Therapeutics Group
Term: 2021 - 2023
Tom Putnam
Principal / Putnam Films, Inc.
Jonathan McKee
Professional Sailor
Walt Tabler
Retired / Puget Sound Pilots
Jonathan Frodge
Stormwater Scientist & Limnologist/Seattle Public Utilities
Ned Johnson
Retired / Architect
Patricia Baird
Advanced Therapeutics Group
Glenn Bonci
HR Creative Group
Sara Parker
Climate Policy and Law Consultant
Tiffany Sevilla
Workforce Development Program Manager / Port of Seattle
Katrina Sukola
Florence Smith
Owner / Fluidity Psych, LLC
Stephanie Burns
Program Director / Maritime High School
David Garton
Retired Attorney / NOAA
Elana Garton
Founder / Empilo Health
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
We do not display disability information for organizations with fewer than 15 staff.
Equity strategies
Last updated: 03/10/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.