Friends of the Urban Forest
Greening San Francisco
Learn how to support this organization
Friends of the Urban Forest
EIN: 94-2699528
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
Given the harsh reality of the climate crisis and its potential local impact, a fully-stocked urban forest is vital for the health and well-being of San Francisco. Unfortunately, with an estimated tree canopy coverage of only 13.7%, San Francisco lags behind most major U.S. cities in the extent of its urban forest. City leaders have under-funded the municipal urban forestry program for decades, with the result that tree mortality has been outpacing tree planting, and existing street trees have been badly neglected. Friends of the Urban Forest must address the challenges of growing programs and staff, provide meaningful leadership in the use of urban forestry as a climate crisis mitigation strategy, and lead the effort to increase the city's tree canopy cover.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Urban Forestry
Friends of the Urban Forest helps individuals and neighborhood groups plant and care for street trees and sidewalk gardens in San Francisco. This "green infrastructure" improves the city by beautifying neighborhoods, cleaning the air, and reducing polluted stormwater runoff. Since 1981, FUF has brought communities together to plant more than 60,000 trees, totaling almost half of the city's street tree canopy. We fulfill our mission through greening, community engagement, education, and advocacy.
Where we work
Awards
Champion of Trees 2018
Arbor Day Foundation
Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Total percent of forest cover for the service area
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Urban Forestry
Type of Metric
Context - describing the issue we work on
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
The San Francisco Planning Department performed an Urban Tree Canopy Analysis using aerial imagery and additional data sets to determine a canopy estimate for the City & County of San Francisco.
Number of individuals applying skills learned through the organization's training
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Young adults, Adolescents
Related Program
Urban Forestry
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
The Green Teens program is one of the few paid urban forestry vocational skills training programs that provide opportunity and mentorship to youth in San Francisco, ages 14-19.
Number of trees planted
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We plant street trees in under-canopied neighborhoods in San Francisco, because they're a cost-effective tool for mitigating global warming, and because everyone deserves the benefits they provide.
Number of trees cared for
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Urban Forestry
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We make scheduled "house calls" to street trees during their establishment period to assess their health and prune them as needed, and we provide emergency care for young trees that require it.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Our overall objective is to transform San Francisco’s urban forest by increasing tree canopy through community planting, removing the maximum possible amount of impermeable surface through sidewalk landscaping, and continuing our educational and community engagement programs to create new stewards of the urban forest. Our current specific objectives are:
Secure robust new funding for growing the urban forest
StreetTreeSF, San Francisco's municipal tree maintenance program, only funds the care of trees after they have become established (three years post-planting). Therefore we seek to secure dedicated public funding for tree planting, while we continue to build our own philanthropic capacity.
Mobilize public demand and support for growing the urban forest
We remain committed to community-based urban forestry, training and educating tree stewards, and furthering the profession of urban forestry. Changes in our planting model due to the passage of the Healthy Trees and Safe Sidewalks ballot measure (Proposition E) in 2016 require changes in FUF’s community engagement model; we must commit to ongoing experimentation and innovation with our outreach and engagement activities. Partnerships with government officials, community organizations, and community members will be critical to our success.
Build the systems and infrastructure needed for growing the urban forest
With the advent of StreetTreeSF, multiple large government grants, and increasing annual tree planting goals, FUF must scale up administrative systems and infrastructure to improve its efficiency and accuracy in data collection, project management, and grant reporting. FUF has excelled at implementing best practices for tree planting. Recent improvements (i.e. mulching and watering on planting day) continue to improve the quality of our work. We must also ensure that efficiency, safety, and staff well-being are re-evaluated and updated as needed. To meet both our internal needs and the requirements of funders, the city's Bureau of Urban Forestry, contractors, and large government grants such as StreetTreeSF, FUF must be able to collect, analyze, manage, and share data.
Continue to advance the practice of urban forestry
In past strategic plans we have developed new and innovative programming in sidewalk landscaping and education, and our commitment to those programs continues.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
To secure robust new funding for growing the urban forest, our strategies are:
In collaboration with the Mayor’s office and District Supervisors, explore all possible sources for tree planting funding that will provide annual funding dedicated to tree planting beyond 2022.
Build robust and sustainable organizational annual philanthropic capacity for our organization through diversified revenue streams: foundations; corporations; major donors and individual gifts.
Build ongoing relationships with tech/corporate community in San Francisco to capitalize on place based giving and attract specialized funding.
Build an organization-wide culture of philanthropy and integrate fund development into all FUF events and programs.
Assure a steady stream of new funders by converting volunteers into members who then become renewable donors.
Involve the Board in all aspects of the Development process.
Launch a 40th Anniversary campaign initiative.
Launch a “Legacy Society” as a platform for estate and planned gifts.
To mobilize public demand and support for growing the urban forest, our strategies are:
Refine existing community engagement and education tools to build public support for the benefits of trees and StreetTreeSF.
Refine existing and develop new community engagement and education tools to train the next generation of volunteer urban forest stewards.
Develop a network of community groups, neighborhood organizations, district supervisors, schools, and other civic institutions to build awareness and increase support for urban forestry.
Develop, deploy, and evaluate a variety of materials, messaging and community engagement tactics.
Continue to work closely with Supervisors to build awareness of the importance of street tree planting in their districts and the need for funding for tree planting.
Increase our interactions with civic agencies, commissions, and councils.
To build the systems and infrastructure needed for growing the urban forest, our strategies are:
Audit FUF’s existing tools and systems for project management, mapping, reporting, invoicing, and the collection, management, and analysis of data, and review the corresponding tools and systems used by other urban forestry organizations and Cal Fire grant recipients.
Implement improvements in tools and systems identified by the audit/review process.
In collaboration with BUF, develop a system to improve the communication and reporting of tree planting data between FUF and BUF and contractors.
Assess FUF’s organizational strengths and weaknesses.
Based on the assessment of FUF’s organizational strengths and weaknesses, improve and promote employee wellness, safety, job satisfaction, and employee retention.
Evaluate the need for, and secure the use of, land for our tree nursery.
Evaluate the need for, and secure the use of, storage facilities and/or a satellite office.
Evaluate the feasibility of a partnership to reduce urban tree wood waste.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Friends of the Urban Forest has proved that it is well respected and loved in San Francisco; we are increasingly seen as a leader on the national and international level. We have shown that we are innovators in community-based urban forestry and community building. We have proved to be successful advocates and partners with the City in driving public funding and investment in San Francisco’s urban forest. We are participating in national and international dialogue about urban forestry and the role urban forestry plays in the health of a modern city, and as an important strategy in combating climate change. Operationally, we have invested in our human and physical infrastructure in order to be able to plant 2,000 trees per year—more than at any other time in over a decade—and as of 2019 we had more than $2.2 million in liquid assets.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Friends of the Urban Forest was founded 40 years ago after the City cut the budget for planting street trees. Since then FUF’s major focus has been on planting and caring for urban street trees. Ten years ago we began planting sidewalk gardens, expanding our reach to build what we call the “understory” of our urban forest.
For more than 20 years FUF has sought new ways to engage all of San Francisco’s communities, starting with the creation of the youth tree care program now known as Green Teens. Several years ago we launched a workforce development program in partnership with San Francisco General Hospital’s Wraparound Project to employ victims of violent crime for six month periods; this is now our Green Crew program, which provides permanent, part-time employment and training in urban forestry for young adults with minimal work history.
In our 2010 Strategic Plan, our three major goals were: to fundamentally change San Francisco’s public policy around street trees, to maximize our greening efforts, and to build our financial and operational infrastructure.
In line with these goals, FUF was an integral partner in writing the 2014 San Francisco Urban Forest Plan, which called for planting 6,000 trees per year over 20 years to fully stock our streets. FUF’s role under the plan is to plant 2,000 of those trees annually.
In 2016 we were wildly successful in our advocacy work with the passage of the Healthy Trees and Safe Sidewalks ballot initiative (Proposition E). With support of almost 80% of the electorate we helped usher in a renewed commitment to the care of street trees with permanent public funding.
And in the last few years we have determined that FUF needs to be a leader in growing the “whole urban forest.” One of the ways we can achieve this holistic goal would be to increase trees in parks and backyards and on other private property. In 2018 at the Global Climate Action Summit in San Francisco the central importance of urban forests in fighting climate change was highlighted and FUF was featured as a national leader in this strategy.
Building on our successes, we are poised to increase our contribution to San Francisco’s urban forest. We will continue our advocacy efforts to achieve our highest priority: creation of a dedicated funding source for planting so we can grow our street tree population, while expanding our vision to drive growth of the urban forest in other public and private property. Given the harsh reality of the climate crisis and its potential local impact, a fully-stocked urban forest is vital for the health and well-being of our city. And by cultivating stewards of the environment through urban forestry, we can contribute to the health and well-being of the planet.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
9.65
Months of cash in 2023 info
6.2
Fringe rate in 2023 info
20%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Friends of the Urban Forest
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
This snapshot of Friends of the Urban Forest’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | -$91,161 | $782,749 | $675,164 | $37,410 | -$330,704 |
As % of expenses | -2.6% | 23.3% | 20.7% | 1.0% | -7.3% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | -$173,027 | $707,405 | $599,820 | -$60,848 | -$437,089 |
As % of expenses | -4.9% | 20.6% | 18.0% | -1.5% | -9.4% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $3,703,626 | $3,807,282 | $4,062,947 | $3,821,029 | $4,217,920 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -0.9% | 2.8% | 6.7% | -6.0% | 10.4% |
Program services revenue | 3.3% | 1.5% | 0.4% | 1.2% | 0.3% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Government grants | 61.8% | 55.7% | 53.5% | 71.1% | 69.2% |
All other grants and contributions | 34.9% | 42.8% | 46.1% | 27.5% | 30.0% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.3% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $3,470,587 | $3,353,333 | $3,262,783 | $3,834,265 | $4,548,624 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 20.4% | -3.4% | -2.7% | 17.5% | 18.6% |
Personnel | 62.5% | 64.6% | 66.4% | 63.2% | 69.8% |
Professional fees | 3.1% | 2.8% | 3.3% | 6.7% | 5.1% |
Occupancy | 4.6% | 5.7% | 5.9% | 5.0% | 4.3% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 29.7% | 27.0% | 24.5% | 25.1% | 20.9% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $3,552,453 | $3,428,677 | $3,338,127 | $3,932,523 | $4,655,009 |
One month of savings | $289,216 | $279,444 | $271,899 | $319,522 | $379,052 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $458,326 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $110,451 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $4,299,995 | $3,708,121 | $3,610,026 | $4,252,045 | $5,144,512 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 3.4 | 8.4 | 9.9 | 8.2 | 6.2 |
Months of cash and investments | 3.4 | 8.4 | 9.9 | 8.2 | 6.2 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 7.1 | 10.2 | 12.9 | 11.2 | 8.3 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $979,086 | $2,359,692 | $2,695,646 | $2,622,407 | $2,352,170 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $2,500 | $0 |
Receivables | $1,788,310 | $666,234 | $1,149,101 | $1,160,630 | $956,265 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $581,556 | $581,556 | $588,166 | $644,027 | $754,478 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 29.0% | 42.0% | 54.3% | 78.6% | 81.2% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 10.9% | 5.3% | 4.7% | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Unrestricted net assets | $2,476,570 | $3,183,975 | $3,783,795 | $3,722,947 | $3,285,858 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $378,800 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $378,800 | $50,000 | $175,000 | $0 | $0 |
Total net assets | $2,855,370 | $3,233,975 | $3,958,795 | $3,722,947 | $3,285,858 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Mr. Brian Wiedenmeier
Brian Wiedenmeier is Executive Director of Friends of the Urban Forest. He is a skilled and experienced leader, manager, advocate, and speaker. From 2016 to 2021, Brian was executive director of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition (SFBC), one of the nation’s largest bicycle advocacy groups. Previously he led development at SFBC, ODC/Dance, Performing Arts Workshop, and San Francisco LGBT Center. Brian holds a BA from the University of Minnesota and an MPA from San Francisco State University.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Friends of the Urban Forest
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Friends of the Urban Forest
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Friends of the Urban Forest
Board of directorsas of 12/19/2023
Board of directors data
Mr. Ray Schreiber
Josh Bagley
Community Member
Lara Hitchcock
Community Member
Katie McCloskey John
Community Member
Shaila Parikh
Community Member
Lindy Patterson
Community Member
Victor Ruiz-Cornejo
Community Member
Ray Schreiber
Community Member
Alison Torbitt
Community Member
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Not applicable -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Not applicable -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 12/08/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Contractors
Fiscal year endingProfessional fundraisers
Fiscal year endingSOURCE: IRS Form 990 Schedule G