Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence
Building a Groundswell for a Big, Bold Future
Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence
EIN: 61-1026214
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
We are working to ensure all Kentucky students receive an excellent, equitable education from the earliest of ages through postsecondary.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Commonwealth Institute for Parent Leadership
The Commonwealth Institute for Parent Leadership (CIPL) trains parents to understand the Kentucky Education System and work within the schools to improve student achievement. Over 2,500 parents have been trained since the program's inception, many of whom have gone on to serve as district and statewide school leaders. The program has been so successful that eight other states and Washington, D.C., have adopted it to help improve their schools, too.
Strong Start Kentucky
Strong Start Kentucky is a nonpartisan, citizen-led effort to ensure that every child has the opportunity to receive the highest-quality education possible. Working with parents and policymakers in partnership with leaders from early childhood, business, education, religion and health care, our efforts focus on giving Kentucky's children a strong start in both public and community-based programs. Our advocacy targets:
Funding to increase access to pre-k programs for three- and four-year old childrenEnhancing the quality of all pre-k programsSupport for public and community-based programsExpanding our coalition to create champions for preschool throughout the Commonwealth
Strong Start Kentucky was launched in March 2007 with the support of Pre-K Now, a public education and advocacy organization that advances high-quality, voluntary pre-k for all three- and four-year olds.
Top 20 by 2020
Kentucky has made important progress toward reaching the nation’s top tier of states on several indicators of education performance, but is flat or losing ground on others. The result: clear evidence that the state needs to work harder to deliver for its children and future.
Those findings are included in a new report, produced and widely disseminated by the Prichard Committee, “Achieving the Top 20 by 2020: An Update.” The report assesses the progress Kentucky has made since the committee set a “Top 20” goal for the state’s schools two years ago. The original report which was updated this year, identifies 20 indicators of academic performance, specifies Kentucky’s ranking, and defines what level of performance is needed to propel the state to the top of the nation in student achievement.
Prichard Committee Student Voice Team
The Prichard Committee Student Voice Team was designed by middle and high school students in partnership with adult allies to amplify the voices of Kentucky youth on the classroom impact of education policies. The overarching vision is to support students as partners in improving Kentucky schools. As part of this initiative, students have testified in front of the Joint Interim Education Committee on the importance of involving students in the teacher evaluation feedback loop; made presentations to intergenerational audiences about the impact of inadequate school funding; facilitated roundtables with students across the state about a variety of education policy issues; published commentaries in local and national news outlets and led a statewide social media campaign.
Where we work
Awards
Photos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of students who exhibit kindergarten readiness
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Strong Start Kentucky
Type of Metric
Context - describing the issue we work on
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Definitions: Percent of all screened incoming Kindergarteners who meet readiness to learn standards based on adaptive, cognitive, motor, communication, and social-emotional skills. Data Source: KDE
Number of press releases developed and distributed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of overall donors
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Context - describing the issue we work on
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of grants received
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of Facebook followers
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of donations made by board members
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
We have 100% giving from our board members.
Total number of organization members
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of audience members willing to take action on behalf of a specific issue
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of website pageviews
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Context - describing the issue we work on
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of people on the organization's email list
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
In state college going rate, all students.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
This is a percentage number. SOURCE: KY STATS, High School Feedback Reports, https://kystats.ky.gov/Latest/HSFR
Number of all students reading proficiently by third grade.
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Strong Start Kentucky
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
This is a percentage number. Source: Kentucky Department of Education, School Report Cards
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
We hope to study, inform and engage Kentuckians on all issues related to education from prek through postsecondary education. We spur Kentucky schools to success.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The Prichard Committee's longstanding theory of change holds that studying issues, informing policymakers, and engaging the public are all equal keys to our success and to the sustainability of our education reforms. To maintain this depth of work on a regular basis, at the state as well as the local level, we support the following key activities:
• Annual Fall Meeting - of our members and education partners to spotlight emerging state and national education policy issues and to highlight education success stories in Kentucky.
• Top 20 by 2020 – is an effort to track Kentucky's progress on key indicators of education success with the goal of achieving Top 20 ranking on all indicators by 2020.
• Perspectives Quarterly Newsletters & Special Reports - we publish and distribute statewide and to a list of national partners.
• Study Groups – as relevant topics emerge, we establish study groups of our members and experts to develop education policy recommendations which form the foundation for our advocacy.
• Governor's Commonwealth Institute for Parent Leadership – empowers parents with deep understanding of the education system, capacity to take leadership roles in their local communities, and the commitment to demand excellence for all students.
• Prichard Committee Student Voice Team - amplifies the voices of middle, high, and college students on education issues where they have unique and relevant experience.
Key Current Initiatives:
In addition to our ongoing work to increase student achievement and ensure adequate funding for our schools, we also have the following three areas of deep policy work:
Closing the Achievement Gap – the Committee has been committed to excellence for all students since its inception in 1983. While we have increased achievement for all students, we have not yet closed the gap in achievement between different populations of students. Beginning this year, we are strengthening our focus on closing the achievement gap by developing recommendations, highlighting the data and developing an action plan to create a sense of urgency and follow through to close these gaps.
Quality in Postsecondary Education – while the Committee has focused its last 30 years of work on preschool – 12th grade education, our roots from the late 1970's are in research to increase the quality in postsecondary education. With increasing numbers of students now college and career ready we are going back to those roots and beginning a new body of work to increase quality and access in postsecondary.
Early Childhood: Birth to 3rd Grade Proficiency – the Committee convenes early childhood advocates from across the state in a shared advocacy effort to increase readiness for kindergarten and in turn increased rates of math and reading proficiency in 3rd grade.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
The Prichard Committee membership is comprised of over 1000 citizens across the state who dedicate themselves to learning about the issues, educating leaders in their own regions, and advocating for policies that support Kentucky's education progress. The organization maintains a professional staff with expertise in policy, implementation, engagement, and communications.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Our grassroots effort led to the 1990 Kentucky Education Reform Act mandating legislation to enact broad and sweeping reforms at a systemic level, statewide. Ten years later in 2000, the Committee made a commitment to early childhood education and helped push through legislation that required 25% of tobacco settlement money to be used for early childhood; Kentucky Invests in Developing Success (KIDS NOW).
And again the Prichard Committee and our ambassadors were instrumental in pushing Kentucky to the forefront of innovative practice by adopting Senate Bill 1 in 2009. SB 1 aligned academic standards and revised assessments.
In 2014, the Prichard Committee successfully rallied citizens to ask state lawmakers to restore education funding to pre-2008 levels. And in that session we also successfully led the HANDS bill through the session providing home visitation to a larger population of families.
The recent Quality Counts reports ranks Kentucky 27th nationally in education up from 49th in 1983. And while we've made progress we realize our achievement gaps are growing.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2022 info
0.77
Months of cash in 2022 info
2.2
Fringe rate in 2022 info
15%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
This snapshot of Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | -$395,636 | $403,544 | -$40,508 | $609,606 | -$765,735 |
As % of expenses | -30.9% | 18.7% | -1.5% | 26.1% | -42.2% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | -$400,900 | $398,824 | -$44,221 | $607,980 | -$766,613 |
As % of expenses | -31.2% | 18.5% | -1.6% | 26.0% | -42.3% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $2,458,322 | $1,278,702 | $1,935,266 | $1,745,118 | $1,810,577 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 297.4% | -48.0% | 51.3% | -9.8% | 3.8% |
Program services revenue | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 3.2% | 7.7% | 3.2% | 4.9% | 3.1% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 56.7% | 58.4% | 68.4% | 76.5% |
All other grants and contributions | 95.6% | 34.3% | 35.1% | 26.0% | 19.1% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% | 2.6% | 0.7% | 0.6% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $1,278,409 | $2,153,645 | $2,790,532 | $2,334,625 | $1,812,486 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | -15.5% | 68.5% | 29.6% | -16.3% | -22.4% |
Personnel | 52.1% | 33.5% | 33.6% | 39.2% | 40.1% |
Professional fees | 3.2% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 2.2% | 2.7% |
Occupancy | 4.3% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 40.4% | 62.5% | 63.1% | 56.4% | 54.8% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $1,283,673 | $2,158,365 | $2,794,245 | $2,336,251 | $1,813,364 |
One month of savings | $106,534 | $179,470 | $232,544 | $194,552 | $151,041 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $1,390,207 | $2,337,835 | $3,026,789 | $2,530,803 | $1,964,405 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 16.0 | 7.8 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
Months of cash and investments | 48.9 | 29.8 | 22.1 | 25.4 | 29.6 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 10.4 | 8.4 | 6.3 | 10.7 | 8.7 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $1,707,831 | $1,407,695 | $926,148 | $297,925 | $329,366 |
Investments | $3,499,577 | $3,949,242 | $4,219,138 | $4,644,967 | $4,143,912 |
Receivables | $556,669 | $50,300 | $58,508 | $49,073 | $192,132 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $64,749 | $47,645 | $37,105 | $18,228 | $13,145 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 77.4% | 79.1% | 87.1% | 88.8% | 91.1% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 1.4% | 0.9% | 7.9% | 4.5% | 9.2% |
Unrestricted net assets | $1,125,705 | $1,524,529 | $1,480,308 | $2,088,288 | $1,321,675 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $1,970,366 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $2,617,594 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $4,587,960 | $3,862,684 | $3,336,802 | $2,695,647 | $2,932,228 |
Total net assets | $5,713,665 | $5,387,213 | $4,817,110 | $4,783,935 | $4,253,903 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
President/CEO
Ms. Brigitte Blom
Brigitte Blom is the President and CEO of the Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence. Prior to joining the Prichard Committee in May of 2014, Ms. Ramsey was the director of public policy for United Way of Greater Cincinnati with a special focus on early childhood policy. She served 6 years on the Kentucky Board of Education, from 2008-2014, and was elected vice-chair of the Board in her last year. Ms. Ramsey also served for 10 years on the Pendleton County Board of Education. She holds undergraduate degrees from Northern Kentucky University and a master’s degree in public policy from the University of Kentucky Martin School.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence
Board of directorsas of 01/26/2024
Board of directors data
Mr. Clay Ford
EM Ford
Term: 2023 - 2024
Mrs. Felicia Cumings Smith
NCFL
Term: 2023 - 2024
Franklin Jelsma
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs
Clay Ford
E.M. Ford & Co.
Wynn Radford
Retired
Al Cornish
Norton Healthcare
Julia Roberts
Western Kentucky University
Leo Calderon
Northern Kentucky University
Gwen Young
Young and Wadlington
Christian Motley
StriveTogether
Garren Colvin
St. Elizabeth Healthcare
Lonnie Lawson
Center for Rural Development
Julie Tennyson
Marcum Tennyson PLLC
Derrick Ramsey
Retired
Jay Box
Higher Education Innovation LLC
Elaine Wilson
Somerset Community College
Sandy Nott
Toyota
Felicia Cumings Smith
NCFL
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 01/26/2024GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.