The Writing Revolution, Inc.
Advancing Thinking Through Writing
The Writing Revolution, Inc.
EIN: 46-4970867
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
On nationwide tests, only about 25% of students score at the proficient level or above in writing. In New York City, less than half all of third- through eighth-grade students were proficient on the state English Language Arts (ELA) test in 2019. Proficiency rates are lower still for the student groups that The Writing Revolution works with most frequently: low-income students, students with special needs, and English Language Learners. Despite the widespread crisis in students’ writing ability, educators report receiving little or no training in how to teach writing effectively. According to a national survey, 71% of teachers indicated that they received minimal to no preparation to teach writing in college. The Writing Revolution offers teachers a road map for how to improve student writing: a clear, coherent, evidence-based method of writing instruction that can be used in any subject at any grade level.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
School Partnerships
A limited number of schools are selected to partner with The Writing Revolution to receive customized training and support which includes:
- Course training for a cohort of educational leaders and teachers
- Site visits including the observation of teachers implementing TWR strategies in their classrooms and customized individual and group coaching to support teachers
- Review of teacher-created materials to support implementation with fidelity
- Assessment and analysis of student writing at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year
- Access to the TWR Online Resource Library
- The identification and training of potential instructional leaders to sustain the school-wide use of the Hochman Method beyond the life of the partnership with TWR.
Courses
The Writing Revolution offers in-person and remote courses that prepare educators of all subjects and grades to implement the Hochman Method. These courses provide teachers and school leaders with the tools to implement effective writing instruction strategies.
Where we work
External reviews

Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of teachers trained
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Teachers
Related Program
Courses
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
The Writing Revolution is dedicated to equipping teachers with explicit, evidence-based strategies for teaching writing that can be embedded in any subject and adapted for any grade level. Our focus is on schools serving underserved populations. The Writing Revolution envisions a day when all students acquire well-developed writing skills that will enable them to think critically and provide them with opportunities to succeed in school, in the workplace, and in life.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
The Writing Revolution (TWR) trains educators and supports schools and districts in implementing the Hochman Method. This evidence-based method of expository writing instruction builds from sentences to compositions and can be embedded in all subjects and grades. Students’ writing—as well as their reading comprehension, critical thinking, and oral language abilities—improves as a result of receiving explicit writing instruction.
TWR's programming has several facets. TWR offers courses to help teachers improve their writing instruction and an online library of supporting materials to help implement the strategies they learn in the classroom. TWR’s impact is most demonstrable in our high-impact school partnerships. In these partnerships, TWR works over a three-year period to train teachers, offer feedback, and assess student writing.
TWR continues to support our partner schools remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. When the COVID-19 crisis first hit in March 2020, TWR quickly pivoted to offer remote courses and support for teachers, as well as online assessment and an essay competition for students. TWR also inaugurated a series of webinars that have proved extremely popular and added a great deal of material to our online Resource Library to support teachers in this challenging period of remote and hybrid instruction.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
The Hochman Method was developed by TWR’s founder, Dr. Judith C. Hochman, during a 30-year career at the Windward School (White Plains, NY), a nationally renowned independent school focused on teaching students with learning disabilities. In 2012, an Atlantic article, “The Writing Revolution,” profiled how students at New Dorp High School on Staten Island achieved remarkable results after teachers began utilizing the Hochman Method. In 2014, TWR was officially launched. Headquartered in New York City, TWR employs a staff of 18 and has a budget of $3 million. All faculty members of The Writing Revolution are former teachers and educational leaders who successfully used the Hochman Method in their classrooms.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Since its launch in 2014, The Writing Revolution has trained over 8,000 teachers and reached over 200,000 students.
TWR hopes to continue to grow and empower more teachers to help students acquire the writing skills that will allow them to succeed in school, in the workplace, and in life.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
Teachers have requested support with remote learning. TWR responded by offering a webinar: TWR and Remote Learning.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2020 info
4.26
Months of cash in 2020 info
7.1
Fringe rate in 2020 info
14%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
The Writing Revolution, Inc.
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The Writing Revolution, Inc.
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of The Writing Revolution, Inc.’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $110,416 | $462,184 | $182,328 | $303,585 | $399,983 |
As % of expenses | 9.9% | 30.2% | 9.3% | 9.6% | 12.3% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $110,416 | $462,184 | $182,328 | $303,585 | $399,983 |
As % of expenses | 9.9% | 30.2% | 9.3% | 9.6% | 12.3% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $1,279,353 | $2,018,669 | $2,350,451 | $3,254,373 | $3,688,229 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 2.8% | 57.8% | 16.4% | 38.5% | 13.3% |
Program services revenue | 57.7% | 63.3% | 49.5% | 64.3% | 79.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 41.6% | 36.5% | 49.7% | 34.3% | 19.5% |
Other revenue | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $1,118,937 | $1,531,485 | $1,967,648 | $3,176,263 | $3,263,246 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 37.8% | 36.9% | 28.5% | 61.4% | 2.7% |
Personnel | 75.5% | 73.0% | 65.1% | 57.1% | 64.8% |
Professional fees | 7.2% | 8.2% | 7.5% | 14.4% | 9.9% |
Occupancy | 2.3% | 5.4% | 7.4% | 6.4% | 7.2% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 15.0% | 13.3% | 19.9% | 22.0% | 18.1% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $1,118,937 | $1,531,485 | $1,967,648 | $3,176,263 | $3,263,246 |
One month of savings | $93,245 | $127,624 | $163,971 | $264,689 | $271,937 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $1,212,182 | $1,659,109 | $2,131,619 | $3,440,952 | $3,535,183 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 8.8 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 5.4 | 7.1 |
Months of cash and investments | 8.8 | 8.1 | 7.4 | 5.4 | 7.1 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 5.7 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 5.6 | 6.9 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $821,857 | $1,035,754 | $1,215,864 | $1,420,671 | $1,919,069 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $285,032 | $140,600 | $326,612 | $219,026 | $593,109 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 47.4% | 11.9% | 8.8% | 10.4% | 23.1% |
Unrestricted net assets | $535,065 | $997,249 | $1,179,577 | $1,483,162 | $1,883,145 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $50,000 | $75,000 | $275,475 | $50,000 | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $50,000 | $75,000 | $275,475 | $50,000 | $75,000 |
Total net assets | $585,065 | $1,072,249 | $1,455,052 | $1,533,162 | $1,958,145 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Co-Executive Director
Dr. Toni-Ann Vroom
Co-Executive Director
Dina Zoleo
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
The Writing Revolution, Inc.
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
The Writing Revolution, Inc.
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
The Writing Revolution, Inc.
Board of directorsas of 03/15/2023
Board of directors data
Ms. Lisa Amato
Arnold Levine
Proskauer Rose LLP
Chris Hyman
Medical Mediation Group
Kathleen Abrahamson
Windward School
Andrew Komaroff
Neuberger Berman
Rohan Srinivasan
Lisa Amato
Deirdre DeAngelis
New Dorp High School
Martin Oppenheimer
Proskauer Rose LLP
Ivonne Ruggles
Judy Hochman
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 11/25/2020GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.