Community Matters
Community Matters
EIN: 68-0369720
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Safe School Ambassadors
Student bystanders are a critical and under-utilized resource for positively impacting the crisis of bullying in our schools. They see, hear, and know things adults don’t, can intervene in ways adults can’t and are often on the scene of an incident before an adult. The Safe School Ambassadors program (SSA) empowers student bystanders to speak up and intervene with their peers in bullying-related incidents. Since 2000, this field-tested evidence-based model has equipped nearly 60,000 4-12th grade students in 1500 schools in 38 states, Guam and many Canadian provinces with the communication skills to prevent and stop emotional and physical bullying and improve school climate.
How the Safe School Ambassadors Program works: The program engages the socially-influential leaders of a school’s diverse cliques. These “Alpha” leaders are carefully identified through student and staff surveys. They are selected based upon specific criteria, such as: strong position and influence in their peer group, good communication skills, and a history of standing up for friends. They participate in a two-day interactive training along with several adults who serve as program mentors and advisors. The training gives student Ambassadors the motivation and skills to resolve conflicts, defuse incidents, and support isolated and excluded students. After the training, small group meetings of Ambassadors are held every few weeks. These meetings, led by the adult mentors, provide time for strengthening skills, support data collection and analysis of Ambassador interventions, and help sustain student and adult commitment to the program.
Program long term success
Student Ambassadors average 2+ actions per week. During a school year, these individual actions often add up to more than 2,400 interventions, which impact and improve school climate. The results include:
a) decreased incidents of bullying, harassment, cyber bullying, gang-related activities and other forms of mistreatment;
b) increased attendance and academic performance;
c) improved relationships among students; and,
d) increased respect for diversity.
In 2012, Safe School Ambassadors® was included in SAMHSA's National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices. A study of the SSA program found that: SSA schools showed suspension rate decreases of 33%, while suspension rates at non-SSA control schools increased 10% in the same period.
Program success monitored by:
Program success is monitored by measurement tools that establish pre-program baseline school climate characteristics and post-program changes from the baseline data are provided. For example, the tools include capturing school discipline & attendance data, and monitoring the impact of the SSA program on these indicators.
Program success examples:
The SSA program focuses on engaging, empowering and equipping Safe School Ambassadors to create safer school climates. “In the last 4 years since we launched the Safe School Ambassadors program we have had a 67% decrease in office referrals, an 84% decrease in detentions and an 85% decrease in suspensions,” stated Deborah Hall, principal of Healdsburg Junior High School in Healdsburg, California.
Whole School Climate Assessment (WSC360)
WSC360 is a school climate assessment- a systemic analysis process that identifies strengths, weaknesses and gaps in a school’s climate improvement efforts. Utilizing surveys, interviews, focus groups and analysis of existing discipline policies, WSC360 provides schools with a comprehensive report including specific recommendations and best practice actions to effectively improve school safety, increase attendance and promote greater academic achievement.
The WSC360 Assessment process consists of 5 stages:
1. ASSESS the Climate - Conduct a comprehensive assessment utilizing written and oral interviews with key leaders to gain a deeper understanding of the existing district climate issues, initiatives, policies and procedures;
2. DESIGN the Assessment- Utilize customized processes and tools to obtain an in-depth understanding of the school climate (includes surveys, one-on-one and group interviews, in-depth focus groups with stakeholders and a detailed review of discipline policies);
3. IMPLEMENT the Process- Conduct the assessment processes and gather input;
4. ANALYZE & SYNTHESIZE the Data - Review, analyze and organize the data;
5. PROVIDE SOLUTIONS - Develop a comprehensive report, including key findings and a set of effective and best-practice recommendations for strengthening the district's school climate. This also includes a presentation to the Board, or other appropriate body, and a digital presentation to help educate constituents and foster support for the initiative.
Program long term success
Over a five-year period, the Petaluma City School District (CA) adopted and implemented a school climate improvement plan. They replaced school resource officers with student and family specialists, replaced punitive disciplinary policies with formative ones, provided extensive training and support for staff and invested in engaging and empowering students to be positive contributors. While more than doubling its population of Limited English Proficiency students, the district experienced:
34% fewer suspensions, and 28.5% fewer
suspension days
2% increase in attendance, resulting in
$950,000 more in annual revenue
11% performance improvement on
state standardized tests
Program success monitored by:
Community Matters provides schools and/or districts with specific solution-based recommendations that can enhance school safety and reduce suspensions, while also improving attendance, increasing academic achievement and recovering much of the time and money expended dealing with disciplinary incidents.
Program success examples:
“Community Matter’s Whole School Climate 360 is the leading-edge approach in school climate improvements. They take a deep dive under the district’s hood and come up with excellent recommendations for programs, services and policy improvements so schools can better serve all students.”
Daryl Thiesen, Prevention Programs Coordinator II,
Kern County Superintendent of Schools, CA
Waking Up Courage Assemblies
A Waking Up Courage Assembly is a powerful, student-centered experience that enlists, unites, and empowers K-12 students to take a stand and speak up when they see bullying and violence among their peers. This presentation delivers a compelling and consistent message for three hours to all students (up to 750 per session) that neither bullying nor silence are OK. It introduces them to youth-friendly language and skills they can use to safely and effectively defuse, de-escalate and stop bullying behavior.
Program long term success
The assembly has encouraged (our) students to speak up to their peers and parents about inappropriate behaviors they've noticed or experienced, and has opened the door to change. It's been great to be able to reference the upstander messages when I am in dialogue with our bystanders and aggressors. Thanks again for your support and communication in ensuring that our assemblies were a success! - Brett Ploumen, Counselor, Adams Middle School, Redondo Beach, CA
Program success monitored by:
Success is measured by participant feedback and individual evaluations
Program success examples:
I was able to attend the Waking Up Courage Assembly for students and staff last Friday. It was so powerful! The school is still talking about it. I will definitely look into rolling this presentation out on to other campuses early next year. Charlene Hamilton, Program Manager - Suspending Kids to School, Waco ISD, Texas
Restorative Practices Trainings
Unlike a “discipline program”, Restorative Practices is an approach that offers both proactive and responsive strategies for strengthening relationships. Restorative Practices offers a means to develop relationships that are essential to building community so that conflict is lessened. When conflict does arise, since conflict is natural, Restorative Practices also helps build the skills needed to manage conflict and behavior, meet the needs of all impacted, and restore relationships.
Community Matters offers a full spectrum of Restorative Practices administration and staff trainings to help institute restorative practices into school policies and procedures, as well as consulting services to assist with discipline policy updates, and best practices for a school- or district-wide implementation.
Program long term success
Restorative practices are the focus of current research in schools nationwide by
Johns Hopkins University and Diplomas Now, supported by the Atlantic Philanthropies; and by RAND Corporation, supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health and the U.S. Department of Justice. These projects are exploring a wide range of outcomes, including restorative practices’ effects on graduation rates, social competency, academic achievement, alcohol abuse and bullying.
Program success monitored by:
Discipline data, feedback and evaluations
Program success examples:
“Community Matter’s Restorative Practices programs both educate and inspire with three levels of training: administrators planning and implementation; classroom applications for teachers; and formal conferencing training for targeted staff. Their trainings re-charged our batteries and gave my staff a great set of tools to help transform student behavior, and to build safer, more connected school communities.” Daryl Thiesen, School-Community Partnerships; Prevention Education Coordinator – Kern County, Office of Education.
Professional Development Trainings
Community Matters helps schools and other educational organizations empower and equip their staffs – administrative, certificated and classified - in increasing their understanding of the importance of school climate as a primary driver for reducing discipline incidents, improving attendance and increasing academic performance. These engaging workshops and trainings help educators:
• Learn best practices for strengthening their school climates;
• Develop a step by step “roadmap” for building stakeholder buy-in;
• Strengthen their skills for leading and implementing school change.
Program long term success
For over 10 years we have worked closely with Community Matters staff and trainers to do initial training sessions and follow up support for the Safe School Ambassadors program, including a close partnership to conduct training of trainers for a group of local SSA trainers. The Community Matters staff are always helpful, friendly and fully engaged to offer support for our school safety efforts. This collaborative partnership has truly helped us to engage youth as leaders to keep their schools safe.”
Program success monitored by:
Discipline data, feedback and evaluations
Program success examples:
The workshop yesterday with our faculty and staff was awesome! Even the veteran teachers – who were concerned they’d have to hear some of the same information that they’ve heard for years – were enthused about the day! - Rita Feild, Palmer Trinity School, Miami, FL
"I recently attended a Community Matters school climate improvement training designed for Public Safety Officers working within schools. Everyone enjoyed the training and it was refreshing! I must say that I was shocked by the responses and engagement of the other PSO's in the meeting! The facilitators were great!" Fredrick Goodman, PSO Twin Rivers USD
Where we work
Photos
Financials
Revenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
4.61
Months of cash in 2023 info
5
Fringe rate in 2023 info
19%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Community Matters
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
This snapshot of Community Matters’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | -$124,797 | -$373,814 | -$52,720 | $372,434 | $217,259 |
As % of expenses | -6.0% | -18.7% | -5.1% | 30.0% | 15.0% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | -$124,797 | -$373,814 | -$52,720 | $371,804 | $217,259 |
As % of expenses | -6.0% | -18.7% | -5.1% | 30.0% | 15.0% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $1,964,948 | $1,622,181 | $987,399 | $1,612,718 | $1,667,923 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -0.9% | -17.4% | -39.1% | 63.3% | 3.4% |
Program services revenue | 49.2% | 37.5% | 30.9% | 41.2% | 41.6% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 35.0% | 46.6% | 33.5% | 18.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 49.8% | 27.5% | 21.5% | 24.8% | 40.2% |
Other revenue | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $2,090,724 | $2,000,535 | $1,032,969 | $1,240,284 | $1,450,664 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 7.2% | -4.3% | -48.4% | 20.1% | 17.0% |
Personnel | 64.9% | 62.6% | 64.5% | 52.4% | 51.2% |
Professional fees | 0.3% | 1.2% | 0.5% | 8.9% | 24.9% |
Occupancy | 3.2% | 3.3% | 7.3% | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 31.6% | 32.9% | 27.7% | 35.1% | 21.1% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $2,090,724 | $2,000,535 | $1,032,969 | $1,240,914 | $1,450,664 |
One month of savings | $174,227 | $166,711 | $86,081 | $103,357 | $120,889 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $53,206 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $2,264,951 | $2,167,246 | $1,119,050 | $1,344,271 | $1,624,759 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 2.4 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 5.0 |
Months of cash and investments | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 5.0 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 4.1 | 4.9 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $423,458 | $482,466 | $361,363 | $341,812 | $607,701 |
Investments | $7,514 | $13,134 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $263,684 | $55,696 | $30,040 | $240,520 | $141,172 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $25,163 | $25,163 | $25,163 | $25,163 | $92,562 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 97.5% | 97.5% | 97.5% | 100.0% | 42.5% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 32.4% | 81.7% | 87.3% | 27.9% | 20.3% |
Unrestricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $639,529 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total net assets | $477,000 | $103,186 | $50,466 | $422,270 | $639,529 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Chief Executive Officer
Mrs. Erica Vogel
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Community Matters
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Community Matters
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Community Matters
Board of directorsas of 08/23/2024
Board of directors data
Ellen Bailey
Retired/City Government
John Chino
Arthur K. Gallagher & Co.
Ellen Bailey
Retired/City Government
Britney Urbanek
Chase Bank
Ryan Davis
BPM LLP
Kirstyne Lange
KAL Consulting LLC
Manuel Tah Pech
Student
Erin Williams
Exchange Bank
Ilene Fortune
Oakland Unified School District
Tramaine Austin-Dillon
Sonoma State University
Andrea Schulze
Sterling Adaptives
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
No data
Transgender Identity
No data
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data