Native American Rights Fund
"We ask for nothing more, and will accept nothing less than the U.S. government keeping the promises made to Native Americans." -John Echohawk
Native American Rights Fund
EIN: 84-0611876
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
For many years, tribal communities across the United States struggled. The treaties, signed by ancestors and the early United States government were continually being ignored. Federal, state and local governments drafted laws and policies about our nations without our consent or knowledge. Our children were being taken from our communities and our natural resources were continually pillaged in the name of western progress. Then in 1970, the Native American Rights Fund (NARF) changed everything. As the nation’s oldest and largest high impact legal defense fund for Indian Country, NARF takes on issues and cases of national importance to America’s first citizens, Native Americans. Our five priority mission has allowed NARF to protect, defend and advance Indian Rights over the last 50 years in a way that had never been done.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
National Indian Law Library
National repository of, and clearinghouse for, materials in Indian law. Collects and distributes catalogues and other materials used for legal and educational purposes. Provides reference and research assistance.
Litigation and Client Services
Provides legal representation, assistance and education to Native American People
Where we work
Awards
21st Edition of Best Lawyers in America 2014
NARF Senior Attorney Melody McCoy
21st Edition of Best Lawyers in America 2014
NARF Executive Director John E. Echohawk
Honorary Order of the Coif 2016
NARF Senior Attorney Steven C. Moore
Edward E. Cremer III Environmental Law Award 2016
NARF Attorney Wesly James Furlong
Affiliations & memberships
Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance 2021
Photos
Videos
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
- Protect the sovereignty, natural resources, language and traditions of Native Americans.
- Enforce the treaty, constitutional and statutory rights of Native Americans.
- Educate the public, elected officials and regulatory agencies on the rights of Native peoples.
- Federal recognition of all tribes
- Shelby fix
- Carcieri fix
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
- Produce publications, presentations and archives detailing the rights of Native Americans and the responsibilities of the government to protect and enforce those obligations.
- Inform governments and their agencies of rights violations.
- Initiate legal action if rights violations are not rectified voluntarily.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
- Seventeen staff attorneys
- The worlds largest archive of tribal documents
- Three offices easily and readily accessible to tribes and Federal Government offices strategically situated.
- Funding of twenty five Indian Legal Services offices in Indian Country
- Formal and Informal cooperation with law schools, private law firms, expert witnesses, government agencies, consultants and other Native nonprofits.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Accomplished
- American Indian Religious Freedom Act
- Native American Voting Rights Coalition
- U.S. v. Washington
- Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
- Indian Child Welfare Act
- Menomonie Restoration
- Trust Reform
- Supreme Court Victories
- Supreme Court Project
- Alaska Voting Rights/Native language voting materials
- TEDNA securing of federal appropriations
- Klamath Basin Adjudication water volume victories
- Agua Caliente groundwater rights determination
- Shinnecock recognition (as well as a number of other tribes)
- Katie John v. United States
Yet to accomplish
- Federal recognition of all tribes
- "Shelby fix"
- "Carcieri fix'
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
13.87
Months of cash in 2023 info
6.5
Fringe rate in 2023 info
21%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Native American Rights Fund
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Oct 01 - Sep 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Oct 01 - Sep 30
This snapshot of Native American Rights Fund’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $551,673 | $2,302,563 | $19,107,971 | -$7,088,762 | $7,926,897 |
As % of expenses | 4.4% | 20.1% | 138.4% | -49.3% | 43.0% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $490,736 | $2,240,117 | $18,973,856 | -$7,290,450 | $7,618,988 |
As % of expenses | 3.9% | 19.4% | 136.1% | -50.0% | 40.7% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $13,057,847 | $16,394,707 | $30,510,271 | $17,548,546 | $18,937,073 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -1.6% | 25.6% | 86.1% | -42.5% | 7.9% |
Program services revenue | 3.7% | 3.6% | 22.6% | 5.5% | 4.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 12.1% | 9.0% | 4.5% | 6.4% | 6.7% |
Government grants | 21.2% | 8.2% | 8.4% | 6.5% | 9.2% |
All other grants and contributions | 60.5% | 70.5% | 48.4% | 77.5% | 85.5% |
Other revenue | 2.5% | 8.7% | 16.1% | 4.2% | -5.4% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $12,677,716 | $11,460,649 | $13,804,967 | $14,375,935 | $18,432,231 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | -0.6% | -9.6% | 20.5% | 4.1% | 28.2% |
Personnel | 47.6% | 52.2% | 49.3% | 57.1% | 54.4% |
Professional fees | 8.7% | 15.9% | 23.4% | 11.7% | 9.7% |
Occupancy | 2.4% | 3.6% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% |
All other expenses | 36.3% | 28.3% | 23.6% | 27.5% | 26.3% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $12,738,653 | $11,523,095 | $13,939,082 | $14,577,623 | $18,740,140 |
One month of savings | $1,056,476 | $955,054 | $1,150,414 | $1,197,995 | $1,536,019 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $19,010 | $20,987 | $18,474 | $19,054 |
Fixed asset additions | $125,170 | $86,747 | $7,680,789 | $2,208,124 | $1,625,154 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $13,920,299 | $12,583,906 | $22,791,272 | $18,002,216 | $21,920,367 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 3.0 | 5.7 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 6.5 |
Months of cash and investments | 39.6 | 48.6 | 45.7 | 35.8 | 35.0 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 36.8 | 43.0 | 45.6 | 36.0 | 32.2 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $3,186,005 | $5,459,355 | $9,053,297 | $4,631,036 | $9,940,441 |
Investments | $38,669,064 | $40,940,734 | $43,560,875 | $38,312,774 | $43,802,184 |
Receivables | $2,572,671 | $3,266,436 | $11,192,640 | $10,662,274 | $3,448,010 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $2,373,766 | $1,653,982 | $9,244,957 | $11,428,710 | $13,053,867 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 50.5% | 27.5% | 5.4% | 5.9% | 7.5% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 3.1% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Unrestricted net assets | $39,943,793 | $42,183,910 | $61,157,766 | $53,867,316 | $61,486,304 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $3,447,512 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $1,034,947 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $4,482,459 | $7,066,996 | $10,115,367 | $8,913,048 | $6,374,209 |
Total net assets | $44,426,252 | $49,250,906 | $71,273,133 | $62,780,364 | $67,860,513 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Mr. John E Echohawk
John Echohawk, a Pawnee, is the Executive Director of NARF. He was the first graduate of the University of New Mexico's special program to train Indian lawyers, and was a founding member of the American Indian Law Students Association while in law school. John has been with NARF since its inception, having served continuously as Executive Director since 1977. He has been recognized as one of the 100 most influential lawyers in America by the National Law Journal since 1988 and has received numerous service awards and other recognition for his leadership in the Indian law field. He serves on the Boards of the American Indian Resources Institute, the Association on American Indian Affairs, the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the National Center for American Indian Enterprise Development. B.A., University of New Mexico (1967); J.D., University of New Mexico (1970); Reginald Heber Smith Fellow (1970-72); Native American Rights Fund (August 1970 to present); admitted to practice law in Colorado.
Deputy Direcotry
Matthew Campbell
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Native American Rights Fund
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Native American Rights Fund
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
Native American Rights Fund
Board of directorsas of 01/22/2024
Board of directors data
Mrs. Lacy Horn
Cherokee Nation
Term: 2017 - 2023
Mr. Kenneth Kahn
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians
Term: 2017 - 2023
Lacey A. Horn
Cherokee Nation
Kenneth Kahn
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians
Camille K. Kalama
Native Hawaiian
Rhonda Pitka
Athabascan/Inupiaq
Rebecca Miles
Nez Perce Tribe
Robert Miguel
Ak-Chin Indian Community
Rebecca Crooks Stratton
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux
Jamie Azure
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa
Geoffrey Blackwell
AMERIND
Stephanie Bryan
Poarch Band of Creek Indians
Gayla Hoseth
Curyung Tribe
Michael Petoskey
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa Chippewa Indians
Louie Ungaro
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 05/20/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Contractors
Fiscal year endingProfessional fundraisers
Fiscal year endingSOURCE: IRS Form 990 Schedule G