PLATINUM2024

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Building Community, Developing Skills, Enriching Lives

aka Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco   |   San Francisco, CA   |  www.ecs-sf.org
GuideStar Charity Check

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

EIN: 94-3096716


Mission

Our Mission: Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco (ECS) helps homeless and very low-income people every day and every night obtain the housing, jobs, shelter, and essential services each person needs to prevent and end homelessness.

Ruling year info

1990

Executive Director

Ms. Beth Stokes

Main address

165 8th Street 3rd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94103 USA

Show more contact info

EIN

94-3096716

Subject area info

Homeless services

Population served info

Homeless people

NTEE code info

Temporary Shelter For the Homeless (L41)

Other Housing Support Services (L80)

Employment Procurement Assistance and Job Training (J20)

What we aim to solve

This profile needs more info.

If it is your nonprofit, add a problem overview.

Login and update

Our programs

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?

INTERIM HOUSING (SHELTER) FOR ADULTS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS

For 41 years, Episcopal Community Services has functioned as a lifeline that has stood steadfast at the intersection of housing insecurity and emergency homelessness response. Within our Interim Housing sites, we offer case management, behavioral health services, and support, creating a community that encourages and uplifts our guests out of homelessness

ECS's current interim housing includes the Sanctuary, a congregate shelter with two hundred beds, and the Cova Hotel, a non-congregate shelter with 108 beds. Both are located in San Francisco. Additionally, ECS operates 3 roving-format congregate shelters during inclement weather: the Interfaith Winter Shelter (50-100 beds in SF), Severe Weather Emergency Shelter (45 beds in Marin County), and Alameda Warming Shelter (25 beds in Alameda County).

Population(s) Served
Homeless people
Adults

ECS believes that that the solution to homelessness starts with a stable, supportive place to call home. Supportive housing is far more cost-effective than the use of high-end emergency room care, institutionalization, jail, and other ways of treating chronically homeless individuals. It also improves participants’ quality of life and helps them to end the vicious cycle of homelessness.

ECS is one of the Bay Area's largest, most comprehensive providers of supportive housing and homelessness services, and a leader in San Francisco's plan to create more supportive housing. Episcopal Community Services provides services that support housing retention and stability at 22 different sites, providing permanent housing with on-site social services to more than 1,890 individuals and families who are homeless. 

Population(s) Served
Adults
Families

The ECS Workforce Development and Social Enterprise program provides individuals with job counseling, adult education, GED, culinary training, and other vocational programs to help them move into stable employment and better jobs. All clients within workforce development are given a weekly stipend to improve independence and stability

Conquering Homelessness through Employment in Food Services (CHEFS) is a culinary training program in which students spend 10 weeks in the kitchen learning their craft until they have mastered the skills to run the kitchen themselves.

Realizing Employment And Careers in Human services (REACH) trains individuals in the community and social services field, inviting those with lived experience of housing insecurity to leverage their expertise to give back to the community.

The ECS Job Center provides assistance with career skills and advancement, employment services, education, and more.

Population(s) Served
Adults
Economically disadvantaged people

Each year, Canon Kip Senior Day Center serves approximately 1,000 homeless, low-income seniors aged 60 and older and young disabled adults.  The program targets seniors with mental health, substance abuse or physical health issues who are not linked with any other system of care.  Daily programs offer lunch, case management, recreation, information and caring support.  The Center also provides a growing number of homeless seniors with case management and support groups.  Forty percent of the participants are Filipino elders living in the South of Market neighborhood.

Canon Kip Senior Day Center is also an Aging and Disability Resource Center for the South of Market neighborhood.

Population(s) Served
Seniors
Economically disadvantaged people
People with physical disabilities
People with psychosocial disabilities

ADULT COORDINATED ENTRY (ACE) is the foundation of San Francisco’s Homelessness Response System, treating homelessness as an emergency to be addressed quickly and effectively. Episcopal Community Services manages this citywide function. ACE is a consistent, community-wide intake process to match people experiencing homelessness to available housing and/or focused community resources that are the best fit. It includes a clear set of entry points, a standardized method to assess and prioritize needs, and a streamlined process for rapidly connecting people to a solution to their homelessness.

PROBLEM SOLVING was launched in late 2019 to assist those individuals who were assessed in ACE but for any number of reasons were not placed into a housing solution. The program provides 1:1 support to individuals, guiding and supporting them to uncovering solutions to their homelessness through their own relationships and resources.

Population(s) Served
Homeless people
Veterans

ECS's Scattered Site Housing Department was established in 2021. As opposed to site-based permanent supportive housing, the scattered sites model houses participants in privately-owned units. Staff help participants remain in their housing by providing various services including case management, housing location, workforce services, access to a behavioral health clinician, subsidy administration, life skills training and advocacy. The Scattered Site Housing Department's portfolio of programs consists of the Flexible Housing Subsidy Pool, Adult Rapid Rehousing, Mainstream Voucher, and its newest program, the Family Rapid Rehousing Program in San Rafael.

Population(s) Served
Families

ECS launched its Behavior Health Services program in 2019 but has been providing behavioral health services to interim housing sites since 2001. The programming now works in two shelters and in collaboration with San Francisco’s Department of Public Health’s Roving Behavioral Health team to provide services to adults experiencing homelessness and currently residing in Project RoomKey sites throughout San Francisco.

ECS clinicians provide clients with coordinated and integrated services to address mental health challenges and support recovery. Issues addressed include psychiatric, substance abuse, and co-occurring chronic medical conditions. The team utilizes evidenced-based modalities to address each individual’s unique mental health and substance abuse needs as well as provides referrals to other community-based services. Support includes assessments, client goal-setting, counseling, case management, referrals, crisis intervention, and benefits advocacy.

Population(s) Served
Homeless people
Adults

Where we work

Our results

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.

Number of meals served or provided

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults, Economically disadvantaged people, Families, Veterans, People with disabilities

Type of Metric

Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues

Direction of Success

Increasing

Participants living in permanent supportive housing.

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Economically disadvantaged people, Veterans, People with disabilities, Adults, Families

Related Program

PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

New starts in shelter

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults, Economically disadvantaged people

Related Program

INTERIM HOUSING (SHELTER) FOR ADULTS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS

Type of Metric

Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues

Direction of Success

Increasing

Clients newly housed through the coordinated entry system

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults, Economically disadvantaged people

Related Program

ADULTS COORDINATED ENTRY & PROBLEM SOLVING

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Employment placement through workforce development programs

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults, Economically disadvantaged people, Unemployed people

Related Program

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Type of Metric

Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues

Direction of Success

Increasing

Our Sustainable Development Goals

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.

Goals & Strategy

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

How we listen

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.

done We shared information about our current feedback practices.
  • How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?

    To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals

  • Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?

    We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded

  • What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?

    We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback

Financials

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco
Fiscal year: Jul 01 - Jun 30

Revenue vs. expenses:  breakdown

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info
NET GAIN/LOSS:    in 
Note: When component data are not available, the graph displays the total Revenue and/or Expense values.

Liquidity in 2023 info

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

0.42

Average of 1.04 over 10 years

Months of cash in 2023 info

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

3.6

Average of 2.2 over 10 years

Fringe rate in 2023 info

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

27%

Average of 32% over 10 years

Funding sources info

Source: IRS Form 990

Assets & liabilities info

Source: IRS Form 990

Financial data

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Revenue & expenses

Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info

Fiscal year ending: cloud_download Download Data

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Balance sheet

Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info

The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.

Fiscal year ending: cloud_download Download Data

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Financial trends analysis Glossary & formula definitions

Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info

This snapshot of Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.

Created in partnership with

Business model indicators

Profitability info 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation $200,757 $278,134 $821,289 $4,233,914 -$959,860
As % of expenses 0.5% 0.6% 1.4% 7.1% -1.5%
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation $135,211 $207,677 $752,794 $4,126,080 -$1,227,123
As % of expenses 0.3% 0.5% 1.2% 6.9% -1.9%
Revenue composition info
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) $39,136,038 $45,239,130 $63,527,215 $73,591,009 $61,587,026
Total revenue, % change over prior year 20.2% 15.6% 40.4% 15.8% -16.3%
Program services revenue 9.4% 8.7% 5.0% 4.5% 7.8%
Membership dues 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Investment income 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%
Government grants 82.4% 80.2% 86.2% 77.5% 84.1%
All other grants and contributions 7.3% 10.8% 8.7% 17.9% 7.6%
Other revenue 0.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%
Expense composition info
Total expenses before depreciation $38,829,659 $43,218,738 $60,805,711 $59,456,921 $64,006,175
Total expenses, % change over prior year 19.6% 11.3% 40.7% -2.2% 7.7%
Personnel 58.0% 63.7% 65.9% 61.5% 57.0%
Professional fees 4.6% 4.6% 4.5% 4.4% 5.4%
Occupancy 16.5% 15.5% 12.4% 15.3% 15.5%
Interest 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6%
Pass-through 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%
All other expenses 20.6% 16.0% 17.0% 18.5% 21.3%
Full cost components (estimated) info 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total expenses (after depreciation) $38,895,205 $43,289,195 $60,874,206 $59,564,755 $64,273,438
One month of savings $3,235,805 $3,601,562 $5,067,143 $4,954,743 $5,333,848
Debt principal payment $0 $0 $0 $2,770,720 $643,768
Fixed asset additions $175,708 $72,938 $0 $1,836,219 $0
Total full costs (estimated) $42,306,718 $46,963,695 $65,941,349 $69,126,437 $70,251,054

Capital structure indicators

Liquidity info 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Months of cash 1.8 2.4 1.8 3.3 3.6
Months of cash and investments 1.8 2.5 1.9 3.6 3.6
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.1 0.9
Balance sheet composition info 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Cash $5,794,908 $8,487,485 $8,976,657 $16,250,879 $19,127,184
Investments $25,936 $607,813 $602,468 $1,518,122 $127,014
Receivables $3,092,961 $5,607,366 $10,661,064 $8,837,335 $10,208,517
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) $3,618,619 $3,631,101 $3,610,524 $5,446,743 $5,618,476
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) 91.8% 91.7% 93.6% 64.0% 66.8%
Liabilities (as a % of assets) 62.2% 64.0% 60.3% 29.7% 69.8%
Unrestricted net assets $2,562,075 $2,769,752 $3,522,546 $7,648,626 $6,421,503
Temporarily restricted net assets $1,445,480 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Permanently restricted net assets $0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total restricted net assets $1,445,480 $3,188,369 $5,088,584 $14,988,758 $13,529,469
Total net assets $4,007,555 $5,958,121 $8,611,130 $22,637,384 $19,950,972

Key data checks

Key data checks info 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Material data errors No No No No No

Operations

The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.

Documents
Form 1023/1024 is not available for this organization

Executive Director

Ms. Beth Stokes

Beth Stokes possesses 20 years of experience in housing and homeless services and her counsel is widely sought by civic leaders, government managers, and nonprofit colleagues. Ms. Stokes is the Executive Director of Episcopal Community Services (ECS), an organization which serves 13,000 people a year, guided by its mission to obtain the housing, jobs, shelter, and essential services needed to prevent and end homelessness. Her previous roles include Western Region Managing Director for the Corporation for Supportive Housing, Director of Programs for the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, and Executive Director of Hamilton Families.

Number of employees

Source: IRS Form 990

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Officers, directors, trustees, and key employees

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

Compensation
Other
Related
Show data for fiscal year
Compensation data
Download up to 5 most recent years of officer and director compensation data for this organization

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Highest paid employees

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

Compensation
Other
Related
Show data for fiscal year
Compensation data
Download up to 5 most recent years of highest paid employee data for this organization

Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco

Board of directors
as of 08/21/2024
SOURCE: Self-reported by organization
Board of directors data
Download the most recent year of board of directors data for this organization
Board chair

The Rt. Rev. Austin Rios

Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of California

Richard Springwater

Springwater Investments, LLC

Beth Stokes

Episcopal Community Services

Keith Geeslin

Francisco Partners Management, LLC

Susanna Singer

Church Divinity School of the Pacific

Jonathan Rodriguez

Sancus Law at Cornerstone Law Group

Doug Bond

Amity Foundation

Heidi Ho

University of San Francisco School of Law

Susan Ketcham

Ballard Consulting

Alejandro Martinez

CRCD Partners, LLC

Megan McTiernan

McTiernan Strategies

Eric Metoyer

Diocese of California

Jonathan Rodriguez

Sancus Law at Cornerstone Law Group

Dara Silveira

Keller Benvenutti Kim LLP

Barbara Solomon

Retired

Meredith Tennent

Retired

Board leadership practices

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.

  • Board orientation and education
    Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes
  • CEO oversight
    Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes
  • Ethics and transparency
    Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes
  • Board composition
    Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes
  • Board performance
    Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes

Organizational demographics

SOURCE: Self-reported; last updated 8/16/2024

Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.

Leadership

The organization's leader identifies as:

Race & ethnicity
White/Caucasian/European
Gender identity
Female, Not transgender
Sexual orientation
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or other sexual orientations in the LGBTQIA+ community

Race & ethnicity

Gender identity

Transgender Identity

Sexual orientation

No data

Disability

No data

Equity strategies

Last updated: 04/18/2022

GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more

Data
  • We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
  • We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
  • We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
  • We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
  • We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
  • We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
  • We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Policies and processes
  • We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
  • We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
  • We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
  • We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
  • We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
  • We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.

Contractors

Fiscal year ending
There are no fundraisers recorded for this organization.