FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND
Innovating for Healthy Ecosystems
FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND
EIN: 20-5089093
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
Wildlife and urban landscapes are interacting more and more; human wildlife conflict along the "urban edge" is increasing. Local residents must become the stewards of the wild if key areas of biodiversity around urban centers are to survive and thrive. Science that leads to greater understanding of wildlife, education and outreach into local communities about their wildlife-urban edge and deep engagement of local individuals as stewards of this urban edge can have an enormous impact. In the US many conservation efforts are directed at preserving the wildland, habitat, wildlife. Little is directed to the urban edge where biodiversity is often at its peak and where species are learning to adapt. However, they cannot adapt without human support and wildlife is losing ground as urban centers expand. In the US alone urban areas have expanded to accommodate a growing population. This growth pushes into wildland areas and leads to habitat fragmentation, pollution and biodiversity decline.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Bay Area Puma Project
The Bay Area Puma Project is the first major study of pumas (also called mountain lions or cougars) in the San Francisco Bay Area. Launched in May 2008 in the Santa Cruz Mountains, the study is currently underway with 4 cats fitted with GPS-accelerometer collars. This project is the first phase of a projected 10 year conservation effort to preserve and protect the Bay Area puma population. The study is being led by researchers at UC Santa Cruz with collaboration and support from Felidae Conservation Fund, and coordination from the California Department of Fish and Game and California State Parks.
Argentina Puma Project
This research and conservation project is addressing the recently intensified threats to the survival of a population of pumas that is both on the edge of extinction and at the edge of the species' distribution range in the Buenos Aires Province of Argentina.
Tsavo Cheetah Project
Leading community members to conserve cheetah - now considered endangered and vulnerable to extinction by the IUCN - in the Tsavo region of Kenya where the largest population of cheetah currently inhabits protected and unprotected areas.
Where we work
Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of free participants on field trips
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth, Families, Non-adult children, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Decreasing
Context Notes
Students and interns participate in field trips in wildlife habitat - to check cameras, look for scat and tracks and learn about the local ecology.
Total number of fields trips
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
CAT Aware offers teachers a field trip for their students during which students travel to "lion country" and learn about biodiversity, look for wild cat tracks and scat and experience nature.
Number of homeowners/tenants rating their feeling of safety in and around their homes as satisfactory
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Children and youth, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Consistent community engagement creates an understanding if wildlife that is not based in fear. Co-existence has progressed well since the Bay Area Puma Project began in 2008.
Number of attendees present at rallies/events
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Families
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We table at large events and speak at a wide variety of events about wild felids, human encroachment and conflict mitigation. Our research is innovative and leads to impressive conservation progress.
Number of people influenced to undertake conservation action
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We do measure perception pre- and post our community briefings and talks. However we influence thousands to take action with the events, our new website and our intensive community engagement work
Number of participants engaged in programs
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Children and youth, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, At-risk youth
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Onboarded more than 1500 volunteers, our volunteers assist with research, data, software dev, design (Print, web mobile), educators, event managers. We value our volunteers and their contributions
Number of critically endangered species in the region that have their conservation needs assessed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Ethnic and racial groups, Children and youth, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We assess the health, movement, habitat and general condition of pumas and bobcats.
Number of community initiatives in which the organization participates
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Children and youth, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
We attend more 50 events each year; we speak at about 45 community gatherings at Libraries, universities, K12 schools, and other public spaces. We partner with communities directly.
Number of wildlife care situations resolved without animal intake
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Children and youth, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Mountain lion sightings and resulting fear required education and communication with communities repeatedly
Number of instances of poaching avoided or impeded
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Children and youth, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Education and community engagement to reduce poaching of mountain lions and other wildlife. Consistent community engagement to change hearts and minds, and reduce misinformation.
Number of children who have the ability to understand and comprehend communication
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Children and youth, Families, Non-adult children
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Our pre- and post-Cat Aware surveys measure children's response to our materials and their changing attitudes towards wildlife.
Number of conservation areas with evidence that illegal activities causing key threats have declined or stabilized
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults, Children and youth, Ethnic and racial groups, Families, People with disabilities
Related Program
Bay Area Puma Project
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Holding steady
Context Notes
We work in the SF Bay Area and Orange County on 60+ land owner properties. We are actively working to mitigate conflict & change tolerance levels around livestock and hobby animals, and pets.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Using apex predators - large wild cats - as a focal point , we conserve wildlife in the urban-wildland edge. Our goal is to establish a model of urban edge conservation in the San Francisco Bay area - a biodiversity "hotspot" that has seen significant urban growth in recent years. In a corridor north of Santa Rosa, through San Francisco and south to San Jose a resplendent and critical wild graces our living. While several organizations work to conserve this "wild", local residents are the true beneficiaries of this wild and the logical stewards as well. The Bay Area Puma Project engages local residents in stewardship of the urban-wildland edge through citizen science opportunities, volunteer opportunities, community discussions and field trips, and in-school education programs. We employ the charismatic puma and the striking bobcat as our research targets, understanding that their presence is a sign of and vital to our area's biodiversity. Combining real science - garnered from data collected using cameras, biological sampling (scat, fur and collected carcasses) and GPS tracking of puma we identify populations, estimate their occurrence and density, analyze their health and resilience, follow their movements. We use this data to inform local agencies, developers and transit authorities about wild cat activity, particularly to better understand how populations are thriving, connecting and interacting with areas of human development. We also use our data to better understand wild cat behavior and condition in order to contribute to the greater knowledgebase on pumas. Finally we share our data with communities in order to inspire stewardship and reduce fears about living with wildlife. We believe a corps of approximately 1,000 active volunteers (2-4 hours/month) will be a strong stewardship team for this area. So we seek to raise our current volunteer roster from 300 to 1,000 this coming year! And we seek to work with other conservation groups across the Bay Area to assure a positive future for the area's wildlife and for the people living with and around it. We are currently focused on connectivity and exposure to toxins such as anticoagulant rodenticides, and out data collection will assess the correlation of stress hormones, coupled with endoparasitic loads as well as toxicant exposures through collection of scat and hair DNA.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Research: conduct rigorous holistic research in our study areas via data collection using cameras, scat and hair for DNA, and using citizen scientists led by professional biologists; Partnerships: work with partners to create a comprehensive database of wildcat data for the SF Bay Area; Community Outreach: using a combination of social media, guerilla marketing, community presentations and K-12 school programs pilot 5 new stewards to the Bay Area Puma Project to staff and support the conservation of the Bay Area's urban-wildland edge and its rich biodiversity; Scale: once the model is established we will bring it to other areas where urban hubs permeate areas of rich biodiversity and where large carnivores are still present.
We have built a new cloud database to input our data form 140 remote sensing cameras deployed throughout the Bay Area. The new Cloud DB is called Wilde Pod and will be an open source database, for the public share data and view data. The system uses AI and machine learning to clean data and to conduct species ID.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
We have on staff a full time Wildlife ecologist (PhD) who serves as principal investigator for the Bay Area Puma Project (BAPP); we also have a full time field biologist (MS) on the BAPP; a part-time administrator manages our office and volunteers. We have a second field biologist (MS) working on the strategy and an Executive Director (MBA - seasoned NGO manager) working on strategy, development and general management. Finally we have a consulting wildlife biology scientist and professor who works with us on strategy and research design and manuscripts for papers we publish. We have professional volunteers who support the team with finance, outreach, design, technology development, game development (Puma Wild - available in iOS). And our Board of Directors are actively engaged in all aspects of our work.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
To date we have collected more than 5 million images of wildlife in the San Francisco Bay area; collection is ongoing with more than 140 cameras placed across our current five-county study area. We have worked with more than 600 volunteers working an average of 2 to 4 hours a month who continue to steward our wildlands. We have published 3 papers on puma occupancy, road hazards, and body condition in the Bay Area. We have reached more than 300,000 Bay Area residents through our outreach efforts - and more than 40,000 children have participated in our CAT Aware education program - a three-day series that includes a one-day field trip into "lion country" with one of our biologists. We have a small social media following (6,000 Facebook followers) and will be launching a series of campaigns to use digital media to recruit more volunteers and distribute our education materials to more classrooms through teachers. Our CAT Aware program is currently being revised for online access! And we have prevented numerous puma deaths by working with local communities and law enforcement to avoid depredation of those few bothersome puma. So we've had some great successes!
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don’t have the right technology to collect and aggregate feedback efficiently, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
35.90
Months of cash in 2023 info
34
Fringe rate in 2023 info
0%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
This snapshot of FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | -$67,427 | -$41,426 | $61,549 | $59,634 | $44,860 |
As % of expenses | -24.4% | -19.9% | 58.7% | 33.6% | 20.7% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | -$83,643 | -$47,538 | $59,123 | $59,634 | $44,860 |
As % of expenses | -28.6% | -22.1% | 55.1% | 33.6% | 20.7% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $197,368 | $167,225 | $168,693 | $237,259 | $261,202 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -28.1% | -15.3% | 0.9% | 40.6% | 10.1% |
Program services revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 2.6% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 100.0% | 99.9% | 99.8% | 100.0% | 97.4% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $276,094 | $208,567 | $104,803 | $177,657 | $216,661 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | -0.9% | -24.5% | -49.8% | 69.5% | 22.0% |
Personnel | 10.0% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Professional fees | 9.0% | 10.3% | 8.8% | 7.0% | 2.0% |
Occupancy | 8.4% | 8.4% | 3.4% | 7.6% | 0.0% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 72.6% | 80.5% | 87.6% | 85.3% | 98.0% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $292,310 | $214,679 | $107,229 | $177,657 | $216,661 |
One month of savings | $23,008 | $17,381 | $8,734 | $14,805 | $18,055 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $315,318 | $232,060 | $115,963 | $192,462 | $234,716 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 20.5 | 24.8 | 56.3 | 37.6 | 34.0 |
Months of cash and investments | 20.5 | 24.8 | 56.3 | 37.6 | 34.0 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 18.0 | 21.5 | 49.7 | 33.4 | 29.8 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $471,883 | $430,436 | $492,123 | $555,935 | $613,072 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $1,500 | $1,500 | $1,500 | $1,500 | $1,500 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $145,459 | $145,459 | $145,930 | $145,930 | $145,930 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 94.5% | 98.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 2.8% |
Unrestricted net assets | $422,817 | $375,279 | $434,402 | $494,036 | $538,896 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $58,556 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $58,556 | $58,556 | $58,556 | $58,556 | $58,556 |
Total net assets | $481,373 | $433,835 | $492,958 | $552,592 | $597,452 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
President
Zara McDonald
Zara McDonald is an entrepreneur, biologist and conservationist who originates from California, and has lived and traveled all over the world.
She holds an MBA from the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley, and co-founded a GPS technology company, an environmental venture fund, and an advisory consulting group in the regenerative medicine field. A former competitive marathoner, Zara came into contact with mountain lions on two separate occasions during trail runs. She formed Felidae Conservation Fund in 2006 to address the decline of felid species across the
world and the extinction course for the world's apex predators.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND
Board of directorsas of 07/01/2024
Board of directors data
Michael Land
Michael Land
Magic Leap
Zara McDonald
Founder/Researcher
John A. Tompkins
Tompkins travel
Conor McGrath
MIT
Michelle Friend
Philanthropist/Artist
Jahan Alamzad
Consultant
Kevin Clark, PhD
Consultant
Sharon Osberg
Retired Wells Fargo
Cat Principe
No affiliation
Jay Ruffin
The Hackett Group
Imran Khan
Senator/Consultant
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 03/23/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.