Factory Farming Awareness Coalition
FFAC educates people on factory farming’s devastating impacts on people, animals, and the planet, and empowers them to advocate for systemic change in their communities. Our approach is designed to build significant and lasting capacity for the movement to end factory farming.
Factory Farming Awareness Coalition
EIN: 82-4594246
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Classroom Programming, Advocacy Institute, and Leadership Collective
Our three programs integrate to cultivate feedback loops in students’ communities. FFAC educators visit high school and college classrooms to teach engaging lessons on the impacts of factory farming. These hour-long lessons also provide a space for us to encourage enthusiastic students to apply for our Advocacy Institute, where they gain a deeper understanding of the impacts of factory farming as well as strategies to become successful advocates. Students who complete the Advocacy Institute become members of FFAC’s Leadership Collective, where they receive lifelong support to become effective agents of change.
Same programs
Our three programs integrate to cultivate feedback loops in students’ communities. FFAC educators visit high school and college classrooms to teach engaging lessons on the impacts of factory farming. These hour-long lessons also provide a space for us to encourage enthusiastic students to apply for our Advocacy Institute, where they gain a deeper understanding of the impacts of factory farming as well as strategies to become successful advocates. Students who complete the Advocacy Institute become members of FFAC’s Leadership Collective, where they receive lifelong support to become effective agents of change.
Where we work
Affiliations & memberships
Association of Professional Humane Education 2022
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of new advocates recruited
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Classroom Programming, Advocacy Institute, and Leadership Collective
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
In 2022, we reached 91 students
Number of lessons taught
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Classroom Programming, Advocacy Institute, and Leadership Collective
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Our numbers declined due to the pandemic and moving to virtual programming, but they are back up in 2022, and we will reach over 58,000 students in 2023.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
Our Vision:
A just and sustainable food system for all.
Our Mission:
We empower people to end factory farming.
Our Values:
Fierce Competence
We focus on achieving the greatest impact by effectively empowering the largest number of people.
Humble Self-Awareness
We recognize that we don’t have all the answers and will listen to others, including those we believe we disagree with, to grow as individuals and as an organization.
Ready Adaptation
We understand that social and informational contexts evolve, and seek new knowledge to update our perspectives and optimize our approach.
Inclusive Collaboration
We strive to see beyond our egos to meet others where they're at and collectively strengthen our impact.
Caring Accountability
We show our commitment to one another and our cause by holding ourselves to a standard no lower than excellence, openly addressing issues with honesty and directness.
Diversity Statement:
In pursuit of a more just food system, FFAC is guided by values of inclusivity, compassion, and collaboration, and we recognize that equity, access, and belonging must be core facets of our organization. We are committed to hiring and retaining a diverse and culturally competent staff, engaging in anti-racism and anti-oppression work, and creating an environment in which all team members can thrive.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
FFAC educates people on factory farming’s devastating impacts on people, animals, and the planet, and empowers them to advocate for systemic change in their communities. Our approach is intensive, long-term, multifaceted, and designed to build significant and lasting capacity for the movement.
Our three programs integrate to cultivate powerful feedback loops in students’ communities. FFAC educators visit high school and college classrooms to teach engaging lessons on the impacts of factory farming. These hourlong lessons also provide a space for us to encourage enthusiastic students to apply for our Advocacy Institute, where they gain a deeper understanding of the impacts of factory farming as well as strategies to become successful advocates. Students who complete the Advocacy Institute become members of FFAC’s Leadership Collective, where they receive lifelong support to become effective agents of change.
We are concentrating on high school and college students in six major regions across the United States—Seattle, the Bay Area, Southern California, Denver, Chicago, and New York City— with a particular emphasis on relationship building with “higher engagement schools,” where we are visiting multiple classrooms and have multiple trained student advocates. Once we gain traction in these schools, we connect our advocates to partner organizations, such as Better Food Foundation, Friends of the Earth, and The Humane League, to effectively implement their campaigns.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Classroom Programming
Our classroom programming educates high school and college students about the impacts of factory farming on the environment, marginalized groups, public health, and nonhuman animals. Because we can connect and customize our lessons to nearly all curricula, we’re able to reach students in multiple grades and various subject areas. As freshmen, they may hear us in their health class, as sophomores, their environmental science class, as juniors, their English class. Each time, they learn more about the consequences of animal agriculture as well as the power of their votes as citizens and consumers.
Advocacy Institute
Motivated students apply to participate in FFAC’s semester-long Advocacy Institute. The Advocacy Institute, which has both an educational and a practical component, equips them with comprehensive knowledge and experiential training to advocate successfully in their communities. Not only do they gain a broad and systematic understanding of factory farming’s impacts through a thoughtfully prepared curriculum, but we directly support them in running institutional campaigns, giving our presentations in their classes and organizations, creating and sharing social media, and writing articles, among other efforts.
Diversity is integral to a strong and resilient movement. We seek to recruit from a multiplicity of backgrounds and to promote marginalized voices. Students are often members of other movements and organizations tied to environmental and social justice as well as public health. Through their work with us, they learn to connect the impacts of factory farming to the mission and values of their other communities.
Leadership Collective
Students who complete the Advocacy Institute become members of FFAC’s Leadership Collective. The Leadership Collective aims for both near-term impacts in members’ communities and long-term capacity building. This program offers specialized support with members’ projects and opportunities to attend professional development workshops we offer in conjunction with partner organizations. Through these partnerships, members gain access to training in lobbying, journalism, public health, and food tech. Members learn from experts and have ample opportunities to network and benefit from the support of their peers.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Since 2014, FFAC has grown from one employee to employees in fifteen regions across North America. Our reach has grown from 3,000 people per year to around 57,000 people per year, and our scope of programmatic activity has expanded from the first phase of humane education to mentoring activists and leading institutions towards meaningful change.
In post-presentation surveys, 88% of audience members indicate an intention to reduce or eliminate their consumption of animal products. Qualitative feedback indicates that we’re transforming people's perception of the food system and empowering them to speak with their friends and family about what they have learned.
FFAC’s powerful presentations provide us access to diverse and important audiences that lead us towards opportunities to inspire and engage future activists and interns or volunteers and to institute food policies at schools, on campuses, at companies, community centers, and cities/municipalities. Other notable numbers include:
- Since 2010, over 240,000 students have attended our classroom programming (We've already worked with 420 schools across the country of which 56 are high engagement schools—30 high schools and 26 colleges.)
- From 2018 to 2022, our internship program grew from 10 to 91 interns.
- In 2018 and 2019, over 150 FFAC staff and volunteer activists spread the word at 500 rallies, strikes, festivals, and community events, distributing over 100,000 flyers and generating 20,000 email sign-ups.
- Since 2018, FFAC has worked with 26 corporations, 26 universities, 15 faith groups, seven non-profit groups, six cities, five government agencies, and three K-12 schools/districts to institute plant-based foods programming into cafeterias and institution culture.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
Students in high schools and universities across the country.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2020 info
3.97
Months of cash in 2020 info
7.9
Fringe rate in 2020 info
8%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Factory Farming Awareness Coalition
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
Factory Farming Awareness Coalition
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of Factory Farming Awareness Coalition’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $317,735 | $132,954 |
As % of expenses | 54.1% | 14.3% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $317,735 | $132,954 |
As % of expenses | 54.1% | 14.3% |
Revenue composition info | ||
---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $921,966 | $1,032,275 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 12.0% |
Program services revenue | 3.4% | 0.5% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 96.6% | 99.3% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Expense composition info | ||
---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $587,655 | $931,951 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 0.0% | 58.6% |
Personnel | 70.1% | 58.3% |
Professional fees | 13.9% | 35.0% |
Occupancy | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 1.7% |
All other expenses | 16.0% | 4.9% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $587,655 | $931,951 |
One month of savings | $48,971 | $77,663 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $636,626 | $1,009,614 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Months of cash | 7.8 | 7.9 |
Months of cash and investments | 7.8 | 7.9 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 6.5 | 5.8 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Cash | $380,806 | $613,216 |
Investments | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $1,025 | $361 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $0 | $0 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 6.1% | 24.8% |
Unrestricted net assets | $317,735 | $450,689 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $50,000 | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $50,000 | $19,184 |
Total net assets | $367,735 | $469,873 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Monica Chen
Monica has a Master’s in Education and has enjoyed working with students at elementary, middle, and high school levels. In addition to classroom teaching, she has worked in residential environmental education, taught sexual health and served as an instructor for the Prison University Project at San Quentin. She currently volunteers her time as a crisis support counselor, and her activism is focused on the interconnectedness of social justice issues.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Factory Farming Awareness Coalition
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
Factory Farming Awareness Coalition
Board of directorsas of 01/26/2023
Board of directors data
Ms. Katie Cantrell
Better Food Foundation
Term: 2018 - 2022
Ms. Eva Kalea
Threshold Podcast
Term: 2018 - 2022
Verena Rossa-Roccor
University of British Columbia
Bonnie Brown
Passion Placement
Naomi Sachs
James Glauber
Kia Hill
Eva Kalea
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
No data
No data
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 04/29/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.