The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
EIN: 27-1226829
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
All over the world, human development has fractured landscapes. Habitats are isolated, roads and fence lines cut through migration routes, and rivers, forests, and food systems are suffering. As our cities and highways grow, we are losing the biodiversity that keeps our planet healthy. For most of the twentieth century, the response to these sweeping changes has been to try to offset the impacts by creating state and national parks, reserves, and other protected areas. But ecology teaches us that protected places like national parks cannot support plant and animal populations if they are surrounded by housing or cut off by highways. Development makes migration challenging, stifles genetic diversity, and limits opportunities for animals to adapt to climate change. To remain healthy, ecosystems must be connected. Species need to be able to shift and adapt in response to the changing climate, maximizing resiliency and increasing their likelihood of survival.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Community Resilience
Climate resilience and the restoration and protection of landscapes cannot happen without community participation. Our Community Resilience Program works in partnership with local governments, tribes, private landowners, non-profits, and faith groups to protect land and prepare for a changing climate. This program is driven by a dedication to real collaboration, environmental equity, and a desire to strengthen the work of communities by contributing science, planning, mentorship, and networking support. Within this program, we prioritize working with vulnerable and underserved communities, recognizing that the consequences of our changing planet are not equally distributed among its people.
Corridors and Crossings
Wildlife used to move freely across the landscape. Along the way, they made important contributions to the places they passed through—pollination, controlling pests, even shaping culture. Human development has made this movement increasingly difficult for plants and animals, just as climate change has made it more important than ever. The Corridors and Crossings Program protects critical migration routes and promotes habitat connectivity by advancing policies and projects at local, state, and federal levels that incentivize wildlife connectivity and reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions. Our inclusive approach links agencies, organizations, and communities in a shared effort to reconnect what has been fragmented.
International Connectivity
After more than 40 collective years of protecting connectivity in North America, the Center is bringing knowledge and experience to bear on connectivity conservation issues worldwide. In the process, we serve as a hub for communities, individuals, and institutions across the globe, to develop solutions, implement projects, and achieve large-scale conservation. By engaging in conservation initiatives, including leading the Connectivity Conservation Specialist Group of the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, our International Connectivity Program directly contributes to global efforts to connect and protect crucial habitat across terrestrial, marine, and freshwater ecosystems.
Where we work
Awards
Fulbright Professional Scholar Award in Climate Change & Clean Energy 2013
Fulbright Scholar
External reviews

Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of publications and papers authored by staff
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
For fiscal year 2018-2019
Number of conservation networks managed
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Number of communities and organizations we connected
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Number of landscape conservation partnerships we support
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
In fiscal year 2018-2019, we supported 14 landscape conservation partnerships through the Catalyst Fund.
Number of internships provided for early conservation professionals
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Number of on-the-ground connectivity projects and crossing structures we provided guidance on
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Context - describing the issue we work on
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Number of federal, state, and local policies we advised on
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Number of land management plans we advocated for wildlife corridors and habitat connectivity
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Number of countries we advised partners about connectivity conservation and road ecology in
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Adults
Type of Metric
Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation is a leader in the global movement to restore ecosystem health by reversing fragmentation, protecting connections, and building climate change resilience on the landscapes that sustain human and wild life. Guided by a team of specialists in everything from spatial ecology and sociology, to climate science and international law, we are defining best practices in connectivity conservation.
But it is not enough to build knowledge—power comes from using those insights to inform, connect, and empower others. So this is where we put our focus. Our technical and strategic support fortifies projects, builds and strengthens communities, and tactically connects initiatives in a way that the whole becomes more than the sum of its parts. We work at the birds-eye view so other organizations don’t have to, keeping a big- picture perspective that knits landscapes and people together, making their efforts as efficient, effective, and creative as possible.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Our mission is to protect and restore ecosystem health at local, national, and international scales by uniting and empowering conservation efforts, building climate resilience, and protecting and connecting the landscapes that sustain humans and wildlife. Our approach is three-fold:
•Provide leadership to the international conservation community by defining best practices
in connectivity conservation and acting as a hub for global initiatives
•Amplify the conservation efforts of communities, governments, and non-profits through
technical and strategic support
•Contribute to regional, national, and international conservation policy and law by educating
decision makers, providing expertise, and drafting legislation
For the networks below, we provide strategic counsel and organizational management, supporting their members and staff to focus on engaging and empowering landscape conservation projects, processes, and practitioners and worldwide.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Big environmental problems like the ones we tackle require a multi-disciplinary approach— no organization can do it alone. Our theory of change is that if each of us brings our perspectives and skills to the table, together we can create the future we want. Our work is deeply collaborative. We convene partners from across disciplines to achieve this collective vision.
We also contribute our own unique expertise through four key focus areas, which have been identified for the crucial role they play in connecting and protecting large landscapes:
•Science
•Policy
•Community Planning
•Organizational Mentorship and Networking
This approach sets us apart as leaders in the connectivity conservation movement and clearly defines the contributions we make to our partners.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
As for accomplishments, we have become nationally recognized for our work in wildlife corridor and ecological connectivity conservation with awards from the Federal Highways Administration for Excellence in Environmental Sustainability 2015 and with the recognition received from Patagonia with helping to develop its Freedom to Roam campaign and the Western Governors Association's wildlife corridor initiative. With regards to large scale conservation efforts, the Center for Large Landscape Conservation is honored to be one of only four non-profits that sits on the Department of Interior's Landscape Conservation Cooperation Council. In 2016, one of our lead initiatives -- the Roundtable of the Crown of the Continent (the 18 million acre ecosystem around Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park) received the inaugural Climate Adaptation Award by the Joint Implementation Committee of the US National Fish, Wildlife and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy. In September 2016, our Center was asked to serve as home of the World Commission on Protected Areas' newly created Connectivity Conservation Specialist Group to facilitate connectivity and large scale conservation implementation globally. To connect nature, we strive to connect people.
We have not accomplished a National Wildlife Corridors Conservation Act with Congress which we have been working on since 2007 which would preserve wildlife corridors nationwide through a unified designation. We continue to strive to get State Departments of Wildlife to invest in building more wildlife crossing structures. Working at the large scale on climate adaptation is always a struggle in a resource limited environment based on state budgets. This has challenged our work on climate adaptation with local communities and tribes. In the near future we have been tasked to come up with a new global protected area designation called Areas of Connectivity Conservation. We hope that in the next 2-4 years it will become a reality.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
CLLC serves a wide range of partner NGOs, businesses, tribal nations, policymakers, land use planners, government agencies, scientists and the networks of individuals working together to fight the rapid pace of landscape fragmentation.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
Based on our years of experience and the depth of expertise on our staff in all areas from science, policy and planning, CLLC regularly serves as an advisor to other organizations working to address connectivity issues. Though approached because of our knowledge and experience, we are continually looking for ways to ensure that our guidance and engagement with partners, especially the Tribal partners we support, are first and foremost grounded in areas they have prioritized, even if they conflict with our own assessments. We are continually learning the importance of listening and guiding rather than actively driving.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We act on the feedback we receive
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2022 info
20.86
Months of cash in 2022 info
14.2
Fringe rate in 2022 info
18%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
Financial trends analysis Glossary & formula definitionsFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of The Center for Large Landscape Conservation’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $179,354 | $562,120 | $132,366 | $226,825 | $1,118,553 |
As % of expenses | 14.0% | 30.1% | 5.9% | 8.6% | 31.3% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $179,354 | $558,072 | $126,420 | $221,970 | $1,114,243 |
As % of expenses | 14.0% | 29.8% | 5.6% | 8.4% | 31.2% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $1,716,297 | $4,383,615 | $2,287,125 | $2,529,289 | $5,316,184 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 57.5% | 155.4% | -47.8% | 10.6% | 110.2% |
Program services revenue | 3.9% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 17.3% | 5.1% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.1% |
Government grants | 0.7% | 3.7% | 2.8% | 14.8% | 3.2% |
All other grants and contributions | 94.9% | 95.9% | 92.1% | 67.1% | 91.4% |
Other revenue | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $1,282,079 | $1,867,986 | $2,260,862 | $2,623,490 | $3,571,829 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 32.3% | 45.7% | 21.0% | 16.0% | 36.1% |
Personnel | 50.2% | 55.4% | 61.0% | 64.1% | 57.8% |
Professional fees | 22.2% | 13.5% | 9.0% | 13.7% | 14.4% |
Occupancy | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 11.2% | 8.8% | 16.8% | 16.0% | 13.4% |
All other expenses | 14.4% | 20.5% | 11.8% | 5.1% | 13.5% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $1,282,079 | $1,872,034 | $2,266,808 | $2,628,345 | $3,576,139 |
One month of savings | $106,840 | $155,666 | $188,405 | $218,624 | $297,652 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $225,100 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $33,677 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $1,388,919 | $2,061,377 | $2,455,213 | $3,072,069 | $3,873,791 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 6.8 | 16.5 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 14.2 |
Months of cash and investments | 6.8 | 16.5 | 20.0 | 15.1 | 14.2 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 3.4 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 8.0 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $723,358 | $2,567,240 | $3,768,120 | $3,289,846 | $4,211,910 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $10,120 | $0 |
Receivables | $269,665 | $951,415 | $23,084 | $239,655 | $1,054,482 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $0 | $33,677 | $33,677 | $25,497 | $25,497 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 12.0% | 29.7% | 45.4% | 62.3% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 6.8% | 3.1% | 9.4% | 5.6% | 3.9% |
Unrestricted net assets | $358,331 | $916,403 | $1,042,823 | $1,264,793 | $2,379,036 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $566,920 | $2,521,090 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $566,920 | $2,521,090 | $2,416,053 | $2,093,351 | $2,700,062 |
Total net assets | $925,251 | $3,437,493 | $3,458,876 | $3,358,144 | $5,079,098 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
President
Dr. Gary Tabor
Gary Tabor MES VMD is an ecologist and wildlife veterinarian who founded the Center in 2007. Gary guides the Center with a vision grounded in science and practice, drawing upon 40 + years of experience working on behalf of large-scale conservation efforts in Africa, South America, Australia, and Canada, and 12 years as a leader within the U.S. environmental philanthropic community.
Some achievements include the establishment of Kibale National Park in Uganda; the establishment of the World Bank’s Mgahinga/Bwindi/Impenetrable Mountain Gorilla Conservation Trust (the first World Bank GEF Trust in Africa); co-founding the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; pioneering the field of Conservation Medicine (now called OneHealth); co-founding Patagonia Company’s Freedom to Roam wildlife corridor campaign, and co-founding the Network for Landscape Conservation. Gary also serves as Chair of the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas’ Connectivity Conservation Specialist Group.
Chief Operations Officer
Kathy Perkes
As Chief Operations Officer, Kathy works to ensure financial sustainability, manage organizational risk and implement human resource best practices. Hired to help build a strong foundation to support the Center’s rapid growth, Kathy concentrates on internal process and capacity improvements, as well as providing leadership around strategic planning.
Kathy’s career has been focused on non-profit management, primarily in the international development and conservation education fields. She specializes in innovative financing vehicles and the creation of earned revenue streams for non-profits as an alternative to traditional fundraising models.
Kathy has worked extensively in East Africa throughout her career, living in Tanzania for eight years and more recently splitting her time between Kenya, Uganda and Bozeman. Her work there was centered around designing process improvements and building local financial capacity.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
The Center for Large Landscape Conservation
Board of directorsas of 09/21/2022
Board of directors data
Victoria Mars
Mars Incorporated
Term: 2022 -
Thomas McHenry
Vermont Law School
Rick Weyerhaeuser
Sonen Capital
Michael Hankin
Brown Advisory
Jason Kibbey
Sustainable Apparel Coalition
Victoria Mars
Mars, Inc.
Martin Kaplan
Retired Partner, WilmerHale
Vicky Collins
Cynthia McVay
Field Farm
Robert Kieval
Diligence Matters, LLC
Douglas Foy
Serrafix Corporation
Mary C Pearl
Macaulay Honors College
Mamie A Parker
Ma Parker and Associates
Meg O'Leary
M20 Group
Kerry Omughelli
Bain & Company
Rick West
Autry Museum of the American West
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
No data
No data
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 08/17/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.