MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
Together we feed our community
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
EIN: 27-1105051
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reports Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
The problem MEND aims to address is alleviating hunger in Essex County, NJ.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Pantry Partnerships
MEND regularly convenes meetings of the leadership of its member pantries. These meetings provide a forum for the pantry managers to share ideas and resources, learn about topics relevant to their work and mission, and collectively address shared challenges. When key themes arise, MEND works with the pantry leaders to design community-driven solutions, often through collective food sourcing, fundraising, and collaborations with key partners.
MEND on the Move
MEND piloted this program in 2021 and launched it as a year-round program in 2022. The goal of MEND on the Move is to reduce food insecurity and advance health equity by bringing nutritious food directly and consistently to those who need it most. Through Mobile Markets and Home Deliveries designed collaboratively with each community partner to meet the specific needs of those they serve, MEND provides increased access to nutritious food to those experiencing barriers to food access. Over 14,000 servings of fresh and healthy food have been provided through this program!
Where we work
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of children served
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Age groups, Social and economic status
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Pounds of fresh produce distributed per year
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Estimated dollar value of food donations distributed to community feedings programs
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of food donation partners
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of participants engaged in programs
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
MEND is aiming to accomplish a community in which no person goes hungry, and in which every person, regardless of their circumstances, has regular access to a variety of nutritionally sound, culturally relevant, and affordable food.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
MEND's strategy is to regularly convene a network of the people who best know the needs of their patrons: the food pantry managers and community leaders on the front lines of hunger relief. Twice monthly, MEND facilities an open discussion and collaboration on a variety of topics identified directly by the food pantry managers, and then raises foods and funds for specific needs they identify. MEND also brings in guest speakers on topics requested by the pantries, and advocates for policies to benefit food pantry patrons. Finally, MEND collaborates with other nonprofits, businesses, and community organizations to support its hunger relief efforts.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
MEND has a long history of local partnerships within the food pantry community, dating back to 1980 when it was formed. As a trusted partner, it is well positioned to represent the "voice of the pantries." In addition, in response to continued requests for more fresh food support, MEND recently established a Fresh Food Hub, a small warehouse space in Orange, NJ. This Hub allows MEND to use its economies of scale to source more fresh food donations and bulk food purchases for specific requested needed foods. While MEND is largely supported by volunteers, it does have a small staff of an Executive Director, Program Coordinator, and Operations Manager, who all work closely with the food pantries and community partners on both collective fundraising and food sourcing.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
We were able to "stand up" the Fresh Food Hub in record time (lease signed in June vs in 2021, as originally planned) and utilize the Sweet Pea Van and refrigeration/storage space to meaningfully respond to COVID-19. Having the Hub allowed us to source additional food requested by the pantry managers - and not available elsewhere (rice, eggs, chicken, cereal) - in greater quantities.
In 2020, we provided over 400,000 pounds of food - 65% of which was fresh (compared to 78,000 lbs total in 2019). In 2021, we provided a similar quantity of food - and increase the fresh food percentage to 68%.
We also launched a pilot program known as "MEND on the Move," to increase fresh food access for people who were not regularly able to visit the food pantries. This program pilot was a collaboration among 8 community partner organizations, 1 transportation partner, and MEND, and resulted in over 10,000 fresh food servings provided through mobile markets and home deliveries.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization collecting feedback from the people you serve?
Electronic surveys (by email, tablet, etc.), Paper surveys, Focus groups or interviews (by phone or in person), Case management notes, Community meetings/Town halls, Constituent (client or resident, etc.) advisory committees, Suggestion box/email, observational data,
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals,
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
Increased the number of meetings among our community leaders from once per month to twice per month. Sourced specific foods requested by patrons and community partners to meet the preferences and dietary needs. Instituted a pilot program for home delivery of fresh food and produce.
-
With whom is the organization sharing feedback?
The people we serve, Our staff, Our board, Our funders, Our community partners,
-
How has asking for feedback from the people you serve changed your relationship?
Seeking feedback and incorporating feedback from the community and pantry leaders and their patrons allows for better overall programming. For patrons, having a more active role in the food sourcing process shifts the power dynamic to feel less like a "handout" and more like an engaged partnership for mutual benefit and growth. For the community partners and pantries, they feel empowered to ask for what they really want, versus the traditional emergency food model which was very much donor-centric.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded,
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome, It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection,
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2020 info
23.87
Months of cash in 2020 info
14.6
Fringe rate in 2020 info
9%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $17,857 | $2,830 | $41,599 | $130,178 | $798,613 |
As % of expenses | 8.8% | 1.4% | 24.5% | 46.2% | 105.0% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $17,857 | $2,630 | $41,399 | $129,978 | $794,081 |
As % of expenses | 8.8% | 1.3% | 24.4% | 46.1% | 103.8% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $221,810 | $193,307 | $240,446 | $407,202 | $1,640,833 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 0.0% | -12.9% | 24.4% | 69.4% | 303.0% |
Program services revenue | 89.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $203,953 | $198,116 | $169,599 | $281,930 | $760,465 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 0.0% | -2.9% | -14.4% | 66.2% | 169.7% |
Personnel | 11.1% | 0.0% | 15.7% | 12.2% | 8.7% |
Professional fees | 0.0% | 7.5% | 0.8% | 7.1% | 3.1% |
Occupancy | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.1% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 74.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 14.0% | 92.5% | 83.5% | 80.7% | 85.1% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $203,953 | $198,316 | $169,799 | $282,130 | $764,997 |
One month of savings | $16,996 | $16,510 | $14,133 | $23,494 | $63,372 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $46,972 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $220,949 | $214,826 | $183,932 | $305,624 | $875,341 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 3.6 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 9.1 | 14.6 |
Months of cash and investments | 3.6 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 9.1 | 14.6 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 3.6 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 15.0 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $62,010 | $52,657 | $122,690 | $212,686 | $925,691 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $0 | $0 | $0 | $39,500 | $184,477 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $0 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 | $47,972 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 80.0% | 11.1% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 3.3% |
Unrestricted net assets | $0 | $29,119 | $70,518 | $200,496 | $994,577 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $0 | $24,138 | $53,386 | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $0 | $24,138 | $53,386 | $48,480 | $130,235 |
Total net assets | $62,010 | $53,257 | $123,904 | $248,976 | $1,124,812 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | Yes | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Robin Peacock
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
MEETING ESSENTIAL NEEDS WITH DIGNITY INC
Board of directorsas of 01/31/2023
Board of directors data
A. Jabbar Abdi
Kate Cahill
Karen Hartshorn Hilton
A. Jabbar Abdi
Linda Klaiss
Benjamin Eyler
Claire Sinclair
Margaret Santana
Rick Wessler
Shawna Early
Darlyn Blaney
Chesney Blue
Magaly Denis-Roman
Chris Costanzo
Dyanna Moon
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 12/19/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.