PLATINUM2023

Headwaters Science Institute

Fostering curiosity through science.

SODA SPRINGS, CA   |  www.headwatersscienceinstitute.org
GuideStar Charity Check

Headwaters Science Institute

EIN: 47-1714438


Mission

Headwaters Science Institute's mission is to foster curiosity through science. We teach the scientific method by engaging students' natural curiosity, guiding them to design and perform experiments that answer their own questions.

Notes from the nonprofit

Headwaters works hard to bring engaging science education to as many students as possible. We have expanded our programs by offering free standards-based career-aligned science programs starting in 2020. We are excited to have been evaluated at the accomplished level for STEM programs in the United states by the West Ed STEMworks program.

Ruling year info

2015

Executive Director

Dr. Megan Seifert

Main address

PO Box 913

SODA SPRINGS, CA 95728-0913 USA

Show more contact info

EIN

47-1714438

Subject area info

Education services

Environmental education

Science

Youth organizing

Population served info

Children and youth

Adolescents

Adults

NTEE code info

Educational Services and Schools - Other (B90)

Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs (C60)

Youth Development Programs (O50)

What we aim to solve

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

There is an immense need in the U.S. for great science programs for k-12 students. Understanding science and the skills involved in scientific research is critical in today’s world. The ability to research, assess information, and use critical thinking skills to make decisions is absolutely necessary for many aspects of modern life and full civic engagement. In addition, science jobs are growing rapidly and opportunities within this growing field are vast. Research has shown that cross-curricular and inquiry-based approaches improve student learning. This shift has been codified over the last five years with the introduction of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Next-generation science is based on students doing science instead of being passive learners. We know that teaching content through the process of doing science is better for students found that students do better in class when they are actively learning science instead of passive learning.

Our programs

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?

3-5 day Science Program

The central feature of these programs is giving students the context, framework, tools, support, and freedom to design and conduct their own short-term scientific field research. We work with teachers to take topics they are covering in class (biology, environmental science, physical science, etc.) and create relevant research projects with the students.

Our programs incorporate multiple Common Core Standards while engaging students in science and the outdoors, through overnight experiences at off-campus sites.

Example topics include:
-population biology
-heat transfer
-co-evolution
-animal behavior
-CO2 and global warming
-water science

Population(s) Served
Children and youth
Adolescents

Our professional development workshops are unique. Instead of talking with teachers about how they should theoretically teach students, we actually have the teachers observe the Student Driven Research protocol in action with real students. This is highly effective because the teachers get a sense of how these teaching methods work and how they can be adapted to their own teaching.

Population(s) Served
Adults

Part 1: Developing Research skills
Students work digitally alongside their entire cohort of peers and one-on-on with a professional scientist mentor to create questions around a topic of interest. These questions soon blossom into a developed research project. Students begin to imagine data collection techniques that will help them collect the information to answer their research question.
Part 2: Hands-on Research & Analysis
Students begin to explore the natural world, using data collection techniques they designed to gather information and refine their processes as needed. Students are guided through statistical analysis to make sense of their data and bring meaning to all that they’ve seen through exploration. This analysis leads to an eventual answer to their initial research question.
Part 3: Present & Publish Research
Students produce digital research presentations including their research question, findings, and digital representations of this information. After presenting this research, students also author a research paper alongside their mentor. This is published in the Headwaters Research Journal and submitted to a youth science journal for publication as well.

Population(s) Served

Lunch With A Scientist is a series of science talks that promotes student exposure to working STEM professionals. Each month we add new talks to our library introducing students to a scientist and their research. Each talk includes a standards-based investigation and a list of associated resources. The talks can be used as a one-time exercise to fill a class block or use it for 2-3 classes by incorporating the resources.

Population(s) Served
Adolescents
Preteens
Adolescent girls
Preteen girls
Low-income people
Adolescents
Preteens
Adolescent girls
Preteen girls
Low-income people

Where we work

Our results

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.

Number of free participants on field trips

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Students

Related Program

3-5 day Science Program

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Total number of fields trips

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Students

Related Program

3-5 day Science Program

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Total cost of work acquired this year (in dollars)

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Students

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of students showing interest in topics related to STEM

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Students

Type of Metric

Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of groups/individuals benefiting from tools/resources/education materials provided

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Academics

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of clients who self-report increased skills/knowledge after educational program/intervention

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adolescents, Students

Type of Metric

Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues

Direction of Success

Increasing

Average number of dollars received per donor

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults, Children and youth

Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of unique website visitors

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of new programs/program sites

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Adults

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of clients served

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Adults

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of curricula designed

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Adults, Students

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of list subscribers

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults

Type of Metric

Output - describing our activities and reach

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of overall donors

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults

Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of donations made by board members

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults

Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Holding steady

Context Notes

We only had six board members in 2022.

Number of new grants received

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Children and youth, Students

Type of Metric

Input - describing resources we use

Direction of Success

Increasing

Number of participants who would recommend program to others

This metric is no longer tracked.
Totals By Year
Population(s) Served

Adults

Related Program

Professional Development

Type of Metric

Outcome - describing the effects on people or issues

Direction of Success

Increasing

Context Notes

This metric refers to teachers specifically.

Our Sustainable Development Goals

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.

Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.

Charting impact

Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.

Without Headwaters, many students would likely not otherwise have the opportunity to pursue an inquiry-based, intensive approach to learning science. Our goals are to get as many students in the United States to do their own research as possible.

-Our programs participants consist of 50 percent low-income students and 40 percent minority students
-We educate over 4,000 students per year
-We work with over 20 schools per year
-over 90% of students say they learn something in our program that they would not have learned in their traditional classroom.

This year our goals are:
1. Bring back more in-person science programs to schools
2. Increase the enrollment in our Research Experience so we are serving 30-40 students per semester
3. Increase the usage of our career-based Lunch with a Scientist Program and find more partnerships to increase the quality of the program.

Headwaters aims to serve all populations with our educational programs. We are committed to raising funds to provide free or reduced cost programs for the students who have no other source of hands-on science education. We make this possible by seeking grant funding, utilizing the generous help of individuals, and partnering with key community organizations, schools, and educators.

-90% of our funding goes directly to our science programs, with just 10% re-invested in fundraising efforts and staffing.

In order to raise the overall level of science education in schools and benefit students beyond those we can directly serve, we also focus on training the teachers we work with. We mentor them through the process of teaching science through actually doing science. In this way, every teacher we work with can go on to better impact all of their future students.

Our multi-pronged approach gives students science knowledge and experience, research skills, increased critical thinking skills, a broader awareness of science career options, and builds their confidence. All of these work together to leave them better prepared for their future, in their careers and as members of society.

Headwater’s Science Institute’s programs are taught by high-level scientists who can provide excellent science education that fosters curiosity in the natural world and in the sciences. These scientists mentor kids through their research projects and make sure they understand the process of science through conducting research. We are really changing how students view science. We are setting them up to be problem solvers and future scientists.

90% of the students agree that after participation they have learned something they would not have in the traditional science classroom
63% of students are more interested in science after participating in our program.
87% of students report being familiar with scientific research.
93% of students are confident in their ability to apply the scientific method.
90% of students indicate that they like science more after participating in the program

In 3 years, we have:
-We increase the number of students, schools, and teachers we work with every year.
-We have seen a 2 fold increase in our Lunch with a Scientist program, which is a free program that allows students to see actual research and learn about careers in science.

How we listen

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.

done We demonstrated a willingness to learn more by reviewing resources about feedback practice.
done We shared information about our current feedback practices.
  • How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?

    To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals

  • Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?

    We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback

  • What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?

    It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, The people we serve tell us they find data collection burdensome

Financials

Headwaters Science Institute
Fiscal year: Jan 01 - Dec 31

Revenue vs. expenses:  breakdown

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info
NET GAIN/LOSS:    in 
Note: When component data are not available, the graph displays the total Revenue and/or Expense values.

Liquidity in 2022 info

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

0.00

Average of 0.00 over 7 years

Months of cash in 2022 info

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

10.7

Average of 6.8 over 7 years

Fringe rate in 2022 info

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

-2%

Average of -3% over 7 years

Funding sources info

Source: IRS Form 990

Assets & liabilities info

Source: IRS Form 990

Financial data

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

Headwaters Science Institute

Revenue & expenses

Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info

Fiscal year ending: cloud_download Download Data

Headwaters Science Institute

Balance sheet

Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info

The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.

Fiscal year ending: cloud_download Download Data

Headwaters Science Institute

Financial trends analysis Glossary & formula definitions

Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31

SOURCE: IRS Form 990 info

This snapshot of Headwaters Science Institute’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.

Created in partnership with

Business model indicators

Profitability info 2020 2021 2022
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation $72,350 $110,702 $13,781
As % of expenses 40.8% 62.4% 3.6%
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation $72,350 $110,702 $13,781
As % of expenses 40.8% 62.4% 3.6%
Revenue composition info
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) $249,481 $288,073 $399,721
Total revenue, % change over prior year 0.0% 15.5% 38.8%
Program services revenue 36.1% 46.8% 48.1%
Membership dues 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Investment income 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Government grants 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All other grants and contributions 63.9% 53.2% 51.9%
Other revenue 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Expense composition info
Total expenses before depreciation $177,131 $177,371 $385,940
Total expenses, % change over prior year 0.0% 0.1% 117.6%
Personnel 75.8% 85.7% 69.1%
Professional fees 1.8% 0.0% 15.2%
Occupancy 11.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Interest 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Pass-through 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
All other expenses 10.8% 14.3% 15.8%
Full cost components (estimated) info 2020 2021 2022
Total expenses (after depreciation) $177,131 $177,371 $385,940
One month of savings $14,761 $14,781 $32,162
Debt principal payment $0 $0 $0
Fixed asset additions $0 $0 $0
Total full costs (estimated) $191,892 $192,152 $418,102

Capital structure indicators

Liquidity info 2020 2021 2022
Months of cash 14.8 22.3 10.7
Months of cash and investments 14.8 22.3 10.7
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets 14.8 22.3 10.7
Balance sheet composition info 2020 2021 2022
Cash $218,962 $329,664 $343,445
Investments $0 $0 $0
Receivables $0 $0 $0
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) $0 $0 $0
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Liabilities (as a % of assets) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Unrestricted net assets $218,962 $329,664 $343,445
Temporarily restricted net assets N/A N/A N/A
Permanently restricted net assets N/A N/A N/A
Total restricted net assets $0 $0 $0
Total net assets $218,962 $329,664 $343,445

Key data checks

Key data checks info 2020 2021 2022
Material data errors No No No

Operations

The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.

Documents
Form 1023/1024 is not available for this organization

Executive Director

Dr. Megan Seifert

Number of employees

Source: IRS Form 990

Headwaters Science Institute

Officers, directors, trustees, and key employees

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

Compensation
Other
Related
Show data for fiscal year
Compensation data
Download up to 5 most recent years of officer and director compensation data for this organization

Headwaters Science Institute

Highest paid employees

SOURCE: IRS Form 990

Compensation
Other
Related
Show data for fiscal year
Compensation data
Download up to 5 most recent years of highest paid employee data for this organization

Headwaters Science Institute

Board of directors
as of 06/20/2023
SOURCE: Self-reported by organization
Board of directors data
Download the most recent year of board of directors data for this organization
Board chair

Alec Atkin

Toyin Weaver

Medical Doctor

Craig Rowe

Copy and Content Group

Alec Atkin

Crestwood Behavioral Health

John Holmes

Retired

Shandon Lloyd

Donna Luisi

Scientist

Board leadership practices

SOURCE: Self-reported by organization

GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.

  • Board orientation and education
    Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes
  • CEO oversight
    Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes
  • Ethics and transparency
    Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes
  • Board composition
    Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes
  • Board performance
    Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes

Organizational demographics

SOURCE: Self-reported; last updated 3/31/2022

Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.

Leadership

The organization's leader identifies as:

Race & ethnicity
White/Caucasian/European
Gender identity
Female, Not transgender (cisgender)
Sexual orientation
Heterosexual or straight
Disability status
Person without a disability

Race & ethnicity

Gender identity

 

Sexual orientation

No data

Disability

We do not display disability information for organizations with fewer than 15 staff.

Equity strategies

Last updated: 08/15/2020

GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more

Data
  • We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
  • We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
  • We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
  • We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
  • We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
  • We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
  • We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Policies and processes
  • We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
  • We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
  • We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
  • We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
  • We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
  • We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.