One Hundred Miles
Preserving Georgia's Coast. Forever.
One Hundred Miles
EIN: 45-5260656
as of November 2023
as of November 13, 2023
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Spaceport Camden
Earlier this year, Camden County signed a land-use agreement giving them the option of purchasing a 4,000-acre parcel located at the end of Harriett’s Bluff Road. The county argues that this use of public funding will kickstart the development of Spaceport Camden, a private, vertical rocket launch site and supporting industrial complex.
Although the idea of a Spaceport is exciting, taxpayers in Camden County must remain informed about the project’s potential negative impacts on our environment, fiscal resources, and coastal communities. One Hundred Miles is concerned about how this project will affect our quality of life on the Georgia coast.
YELP
YELP is a conservation leadership program for high school students who have a strong interest in deepening their environmental knowledge, cultivating leadership skills, and making a positive impact on our coast’s future. YELP provides opportunities for students from across our coast to explore our coastal resources, teaches them the science behind environmental issues, and helps them gain the skills needed to effect change in their communities.
Wildlife Project
Georgia’s 100-mile coast is home to some of the most diverse and species-rich ecosystems on the planet.
Our coastal habitats support 71 high priority animal species and 91 high priority plant species. From the critically endangered North Atlantic right whales, to the nesting loggerhead sea turtles, our coast’s iconic wildlife engage and inspire a new generation of coastal stewards.
OHM celebrates these ongoing efforts by providing opportunities for residents and friends of the Georgia coast to take action in support of our protected species.
1. Educational programming to help residents and visitors understand the simple steps they can take to protect wildlife.
2. Over the past year, we led a community campaign to stop Jekyll Island from weakening their beach lighting ordinance.
3. OHM is a proud member of the Georgia Sea Turtle Cooperative and Georgia Shorebird Alliance.
Where we work
External reviews

Photos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Number of new advocates recruited
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planHow we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2022 info
4.32
Months of cash in 2022 info
14.6
Fringe rate in 2022 info
9%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
One Hundred Miles
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
This snapshot of One Hundred Miles’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | -$170,887 | -$82,365 | -$117,391 | -$175,492 | $1,662,962 |
As % of expenses | -19.1% | -7.8% | -10.0% | -27.9% | 135.2% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | -$174,535 | -$86,978 | -$122,145 | -$177,631 | $1,647,942 |
As % of expenses | -19.4% | -8.2% | -10.4% | -28.2% | 132.4% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $723,482 | $976,281 | $1,057,492 | $471,717 | $6,422,047 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -28.3% | 34.9% | 8.3% | -55.4% | 0.0% |
Program services revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Membership dues | 7.3% | 5.7% | 6.5% | 10.4% | 1.6% |
Investment income | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% |
All other grants and contributions | 92.5% | 93.7% | 91.3% | 88.0% | 95.6% |
Other revenue | 0.1% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.5% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $894,369 | $1,058,646 | $1,174,883 | $628,284 | $1,229,600 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 35.4% | 18.4% | 11.0% | -46.5% | 0.0% |
Personnel | 75.8% | 67.4% | 76.0% | 71.4% | 70.2% |
Professional fees | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% |
Occupancy | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 19.4% | 32.6% | 24.0% | 28.6% | 25.9% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $898,017 | $1,063,259 | $1,179,637 | $630,423 | $1,244,620 |
One month of savings | $74,531 | $88,221 | $97,907 | $52,357 | $102,467 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $163,121 |
Fixed asset additions | $15,941 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $988,489 | $1,151,480 | $1,277,544 | $682,780 | $1,510,208 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 5.9 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 11.4 | 14.6 |
Months of cash and investments | 8.6 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 12.3 | 14.6 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 10.5 | 7.9 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 24.0 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $437,780 | $412,560 | $360,522 | $596,005 | $1,494,773 |
Investments | $204,837 | $150,000 | $200,176 | $50,384 | $0 |
Receivables | $130,447 | $145,307 | $46,698 | $1,000 | $4,573,250 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $38,904 | $41,321 | $41,321 | $34,194 | $544,664 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 28.5% | 38.0% | 49.5% | 45.3% | 6.7% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 2.5% | 1.8% | 5.0% | 33.6% | 5.3% |
Unrestricted net assets | $810,517 | $723,539 | $601,394 | $423,763 | $2,701,611 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $0 | $0 | $0 | $18,925 | $3,529,485 |
Total net assets | $810,517 | $723,539 | $601,394 | $442,688 | $6,231,096 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
President and Chief Executive Officer
Megan Desrosiers
Megan Desrosiers is the founding President/CEO of One Hundred Miles, Georgia’s coastal advocacy organization. In an effort to elevate the Georgia coast as a recognized place of historical, cultural, and biological significance, she spends her time working in local communities, on regional collaboration projects, and lobbying in Atlanta. Since the organization’s inception in 2013, Megan and her team have been responsible for improvements to the Erosion and Sedimentation Act requiring a 25-foot buffer for all salt marsh, galvanizing statewide opposition to offshore drilling, education programs reaching more than 10,000 people annually, and local ordinances that promote responsible growth balanced with conservation. She also serves on the leadership team of the Georgia Water Coalition and the board of Georgia Conservation Voters.
Before coming to Georgia’s coast, Megan spent 10 years at the Coastal Conservation League (CCL) in South Carolina, where she helped to establish the organizat
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
One Hundred Miles
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
One Hundred Miles
Highest paid employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
One Hundred Miles
Board of directorsas of 10/26/2023
Board of directors data
Roy Richards
Joanna Adams
Jim Barger, Jr
Scott Coleman
Little St. Simons
Glen Darbyshire
Sally McDaniel
Shelley Renner
Laura Richards
Susan Shipman
Katherine Warden
Arlene Watson
David Weitnauer
R. Howard Dobbs Foundation
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
We do not display disability information for organizations with fewer than 15 staff.
Equity strategies
Last updated: 10/26/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.