AMERICAN HARP SOCIETY, INC. Parent
AMERICAN HARP SOCIETY, INC.
EIN: 13-6131860
as of September 2024
as of September 09, 2024
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download other documentsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
National Conference
Every summer the American Harp Society hosts national gatherings. The National Conference, held in even-numbered years, features concerts by brilliant artists from around the world, workshops on wide-ranging topics, master classes with world-class teachers, and scholarly lectures to feed the intellectual soul, as well as an exhibit hall with a dizzying array of harps and related items.
Summer Institute
The Summer Institute, held in odd-numbered years, focuses on the student harpist with workshops, master classes, and concerts by the best performers and pedagogues in the world. The Summer Institute is held in conjunction with AHS National Competition, where dazzling young harpists compete for awards and scholarships.
AHS National Competition
Held every odd year (2015, 2017, etc.) in conjunction with the Summer Institute, the National Competition offers a total of over $30,000 in prize money. There are six winners in each of the five divisions:
Junior (12 & under)
Intermediate I (15 & under)
Intermediate II (18 & under)
Advanced (21 & under)
*Young Professional Divisions (30 & under).
* The 1st Prize Winner of the Young Professional Division serves as the AHS Concert Artist until the next competition.
AHS provides financial support to its chapters to present all winners in concert, through our Emerging Artists and Concert Artist programs.
Music Education Auditions & Evaluations
Music Education Auditions and Evaluations (A&E) is an educational program for harp students sponsored by the American Harp Society, Inc. through its chapters. Participants come specifically to be heard and to hear one another. Because this is a unique two-part program, there is special focus on the improvement that can be made by participating on both days.
This is not a competition. On the first day, participants play pieces of their own choosing for an advisor and for one another. The advisor gives each student feedback on their performance. A performers worksheet or traditional theory test is given. On the second day of the program, about a month later, participants show their improvement by playing the same pieces again. Because this is not a competition, no prizes are given, however everyone who participates both days receives a Certificate of Participation from the Music Education Committee of the American Harp Society.
Where we work
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback, Staff find it hard to prioritize feedback collection and review due to lack of time
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2023 info
5.71
Months of cash in 2023 info
4.9
Fringe rate in 2023 info
0%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
AMERICAN HARP SOCIETY, INC.
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jul 01 - Jun 30
This snapshot of AMERICAN HARP SOCIETY, INC.’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $19,586 | -$10,239 | -$37,954 | -$168,020 | -$108,696 |
As % of expenses | 5.9% | -3.2% | -16.3% | -41.5% | -30.0% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $19,586 | -$10,239 | -$37,954 | -$168,020 | -$108,696 |
As % of expenses | 5.9% | -3.2% | -16.3% | -41.5% | -30.0% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $353,079 | $320,139 | $237,464 | $234,507 | $254,201 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | 8.2% | -9.3% | 0.0% | -1.2% | 8.4% |
Program services revenue | 37.1% | 23.5% | 10.7% | 47.3% | 24.0% |
Membership dues | 52.7% | 51.1% | 41.3% | 74.1% | 51.8% |
Investment income | 3.6% | 8.9% | 6.0% | 1.4% | 6.7% |
Government grants | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other grants and contributions | 0.8% | 3.8% | 19.6% | 5.8% | 5.5% |
Other revenue | 5.8% | 12.8% | 18.2% | -28.6% | 11.9% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $332,024 | $316,968 | $233,426 | $405,296 | $362,897 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 16.7% | -4.5% | 0.0% | 73.6% | -10.5% |
Personnel | 31.3% | 33.0% | 37.3% | 28.3% | 29.5% |
Professional fees | 3.9% | 4.8% | 6.6% | 7.9% | 4.8% |
Occupancy | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 6.0% | 4.8% | 8.7% | 7.6% | 4.9% |
All other expenses | 58.9% | 57.4% | 47.4% | 56.2% | 60.9% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $332,024 | $316,968 | $233,426 | $405,296 | $362,897 |
One month of savings | $27,669 | $26,414 | $19,452 | $33,775 | $30,241 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $359,693 | $343,382 | $252,878 | $439,071 | $393,138 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 8.2 | 8.7 | 20.6 | 10.0 | 4.9 |
Months of cash and investments | 29.6 | 30.4 | 46.6 | 22.2 | 21.6 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 15.4 | 15.8 | 37.3 | 16.5 | 14.9 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $226,071 | $229,209 | $400,136 | $336,218 | $148,182 |
Investments | $591,589 | $573,444 | $506,564 | $412,141 | $504,297 |
Receivables | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $5,110 | $5,110 | $5,110 | $5,110 | $5,110 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 1.8% | 4.0% |
Unrestricted net assets | $426,399 | $416,160 | $725,903 | $557,883 | $449,187 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $83,695 | $85,783 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $307,566 | $293,432 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $391,261 | $379,215 | $180,096 | $177,327 | $177,327 |
Total net assets | $817,660 | $795,375 | $905,999 | $735,210 | $626,514 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Kathryn McManus
Kathryn McManus enjoyed a 25-year career as a professional harpist including the principal chair of a major regional orchestra, university and private studio teaching experience, and the development of an adult beginner harp curriculum. After twelve years on stage as principal harpist at The Florida Orchestra, Kathryn McManus moved on to lead the Orchestra as executive director for nine more years. In that role she brought the organization from near bankruptcy to solvency in the ranks of the nation’s finest orchestras.
Senior leadership roles at several premier Florida non-profit organizations followed. In March, 2015, Kathryn was named executive director of the American Harp Society, blending her musical and nonprofit careers together.
Ms. McManus holds degrees in harp performance summa cum laude from the Cleveland Institute of Music & Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH and the North Carolina School of the Arts, Winston-Salem, NC.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
AMERICAN HARP SOCIETY, INC.
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
AMERICAN HARP SOCIETY, INC.
Board of directorsas of 06/26/2024
Board of directors data
Angela Schwarzkopf
Jennifer Ellis
Pacific Regional Director
Chilali Hugo
President, Western Regional Director
Karen Lindquist
Director at Large
Charles Lynch
Director at Large
Felice Pomeranz
Northeastern Regional Director
Angela Schwarzkopt
Chairman of the Board
Susan Spiwak
Secretary, Director at Large
Anne Sullivan
Midatlantic Regional Director
Kela Walton
Director at Large
Joan Holland
Mid Central Regional Director
Jeremy Chesman
Treasurer, North Central Regional Director
Rosanna Chiu
Second Vice President, Director at Large
Karen Gottlieb
Director at Large
Rebecca Todaro
Southern Regional Director
Elisa Torres
Southeastern Regional Director
Steve Moss
Director at Large
Amelia Romano
Director at Large
Rebecca Yuille
Director at Large
Hope Cowan
South Central Regional Director
Megan Sesma
First Vice President, Director at Large
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? No
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
Equity strategies
Last updated: 10/22/2021GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.