Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.
Helping Youth Find their GREATness!
Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.
EIN: 38-3314318
as of November 2023
as of November 13, 2023
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Youth Sports Programming and Enrichment Programs
Detroit PAL’s mission, in partnership with the Detroit Police Department and community volunteers, is to build character in young people through athletic, academic, and leadership development programs. Detroit PAL is working to help youth find their greatness; preparing them to become the leaders of today and tomorrow who learn:
● A positive view of law enforcement
● Transferable Life Skills
o G – Goal-Setting
o R – Resiliency
o E – Embracing a Healthy Lifestyle (mentally and physically)
o A – Accountability
o T – Teamwork
● Detroit PAL Values: Leadership, Responsibility, Respect, Discipline, Diversity, Family, Teamwork
Where we work
Awards
Neighborhood Builders Award 2019
Bank of America
Diversity Champion Award 2019
Corp! Magazine
Education and Service Award 2019
Michigan Governor Service Award
External reviews

Videos
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
PAL centers its work around three Goals for Youth: 1.) Participants of high character (Respect, Responsibility, Appreciation of Diversity, Teamwork and Leadership); 2.) Healthy and active youth (a minimum of one hour of physical activity at least five days a week); and 3.) Youth who are civically engaged (giving back to their community).
PAL's work with low-income, at-risk Detroit area youth uses athletics as the "hook" to interest kids in its programs and then trains adult mentors and coaches to use Positive Youth Development techniques when working with them. As a result, PAL participants are more likely to avoid negative behaviors such as gang violence, drug and alcohol use, teen pregnancy, truancy and encounters with the juvenile justice system.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
PAL's strategies for achieving its goals for youth include training over 1,000 adult mentors each year through its IMPACT training courses, designed in conjunction with MSU's Institute for the Study of Youth Sport. IMPACT gives both new and seasoned coaches tools and tips for working with youth in a positive manner.
PAL also strives to provide clean and safe facilities for play throughout metro Detroit. This entails everything from cutting grass and picking up trash, to providing Port-a-Johns and facilitating repairs such as rebuilding pitchers' mounds and constructing bleachers. PAL also insures a family environment where good sportsmanship is the key by hiring "culture keepers" to monitor games and events.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
PAL is skilled in providing youth-centric athletic programming in local neighborhoods where children and families live and play. For decades, the organization has worked directly with the Detroit Police Department to build a presence in local communities. The organization is proud to be one of three Skillman Foundation Core Partners for its ability to reach significant numbers of participants and providing "layered" services to youth.
PAL is also proud of its work with Michigan State University's Institute for the Study of Youth Sport to evaluate its programs and quantify the impact of caring, adult mentors on participants through the national Caring Climate Scale.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
PAL continues to increase the number of children it serves each year. With a specific emphasis on its Girls' Initiative, it is growing the number of girls that participate by removing any perceived barriers to participation. PAL also continually reviews its adult volunteer training programs and recently added an IMPACT Continuing Education (ICE) class as a refresher for seasoned coaches.
PAL is also proud of its efforts to better evaluate its programs, both internally and on a national scale. Updated participate surveys now include positive youth indicators such as avoidance of the juvenile justice system and high school graduation rates, as well as questions from the Caring Climate Scale. Results are being compared on a national level; PAL is unique in that it has access to data for thousands of youth, making it one of the largest organizations in the nation tracking the positive benefits of youth sports participation.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We share the feedback we received with the people we serve
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2021 info
0.04
Months of cash in 2021 info
1.7
Fringe rate in 2021 info
26%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Financial data
Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Jan 01 - Dec 31
This snapshot of Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $6,330,509 | $473,418 | $1,152,060 | $421,003 | -$456,528 |
As % of expenses | 219.9% | 11.3% | 33.2% | 17.6% | -16.3% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $6,311,926 | $65,556 | $618,522 | -$25,588 | -$914,550 |
As % of expenses | 217.8% | 1.4% | 15.5% | -0.9% | -28.1% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $4,935,263 | $4,479,749 | $4,071,610 | $2,913,155 | $2,563,665 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -20.5% | -9.2% | -9.1% | -28.5% | -12.0% |
Program services revenue | 4.4% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 1.2% | 5.4% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Government grants | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 10.7% | 5.2% |
All other grants and contributions | 93.3% | 93.6% | 90.6% | 85.1% | 85.2% |
Other revenue | 0.1% | -0.7% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 4.2% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $2,878,989 | $4,205,107 | $3,467,695 | $2,392,184 | $2,798,538 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | -54.2% | 46.1% | -17.5% | -31.0% | 17.0% |
Personnel | 50.5% | 41.4% | 46.8% | 47.9% | 44.5% |
Professional fees | 1.3% | 2.9% | 1.5% | 13.5% | 13.9% |
Occupancy | 12.4% | 7.5% | 7.1% | 4.7% | 10.1% |
Interest | 0.0% | 3.1% | 7.3% | 8.1% | 5.1% |
Pass-through | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
All other expenses | 35.7% | 45.1% | 37.3% | 25.7% | 26.4% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $2,897,572 | $4,612,969 | $4,001,233 | $2,838,775 | $3,256,560 |
One month of savings | $239,916 | $350,426 | $288,975 | $199,349 | $233,212 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $558,910 | $445,003 | $276,059 |
Fixed asset additions | $8,877,226 | $3,489,870 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $12,014,714 | $8,453,265 | $4,849,118 | $3,483,127 | $3,765,831 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 18.0 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 1.7 |
Months of cash and investments | 18.1 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 1.7 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 4.3 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 0.4 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $4,325,147 | $2,818,659 | $665,140 | $1,105,885 | $405,883 |
Investments | $28,145 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $1,182,925 | $429,622 | $380,301 | $43,992 | $188,405 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $12,837,042 | $16,274,314 | $16,591,901 | $16,712,511 | $16,781,625 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 0.8% | 2.8% | 5.6% | 8.3% | 11.0% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 75.5% | 77.3% | 74.6% | 73.7% | 75.9% |
Unrestricted net assets | $3,359,030 | $3,424,586 | $4,043,108 | $4,017,520 | $3,102,970 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $1,091,521 | $0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $25,000 | $916,517 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $1,116,521 | $916,517 | $373,034 | $473,002 | $778,862 |
Total net assets | $4,475,551 | $4,341,103 | $4,416,142 | $4,490,522 | $3,881,832 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
CEO
Mr. Fred Hunter
Fred Hunter is the CEO and former Director of Program Administration for Detroit PAL,
where he has been a vital staff member since 2000. Previous positions with Detroit PAL include Director of Customer and Community Relations, Director of Quality Assurance (Think Detroit PAL) and Athletic Director (Think Detroit). Areas of expertise include leadership, program development and administration, data evaluation,
client service, grant management, and talent development. Fred’s achievements and excellence in leadership have been recognized by numerous organizations. At the 2020 Detroit Choice Awards, he was named a Vanguard Recipient for Non-Profit Leadership. He also received the Michigan Basketball Garner Leadership and
Grote Hustle Awards. Fred serves as Board Vice President for Link School of the Arts. A Michigan native, Fred attended the University of Michigan, where he received a B.A. in Psychology and was a
walk-on and captain of the men's basketball team.
Chief Development Officer
Monica DeJesus
Monica DeJesus is the Chief Development Officer for Detroit PAL. In her current role, which she
has held since 2019, DeJesus is responsible for overseeing fundraising, development,
marketing, and communications goals/activities for the organization. With more than 25 years
of nonprofit philanthropy experience, DeJesus is adept at securing significant donor gifts and
forging ongoing relationships with diverse leaders in the corporate, public, and nonprofit
sectors. Prior to joining Detroit PAL, DeJesus served as senior development officer for the SME
Education Foundation, where she developed donor prospect strategies with the foundation’s
board members and was instrumental in securing over $1M in grants and sponsorships. She
also served as senior vice president of development for The Charles H. Wright Museum of
African American History and led corporate and foundation partnership activities for the
American Red Cross in both their North Central Division and Southeastern Michigan Region.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
Detroit Police Athletic League Inc.
Board of directorsas of 10/06/2023
Board of directors data
Mr. Alan Huddy
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Mr. Dwight Brown, Jr.
DTE Energy
Jessica Berry
Adient
Alan Huddy
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
April L Diez
The Diez Group/ J.I.T. Steel
Tony Nuckolls
Quicken Loans
Dwight Brown, Jr.
DTE Energy
Anne Doyle
Powering Up Women, LLC
Steve Grigorian
Detroit Economic Club
Jhonika Hawkins
EXCEL Sports Management
Jerome Henson
Bank of America
Danny Jaroshewich
Detroit Lions (retired)
Wendy McIntyre-Peard
ITC Holdings Corp. (retired)
Michael Patterson
Ernst & Young LLP
Marvin Rushing
Comerica Bank
Dr. E'Lois Thomas
SEEL LLC
Sheriff Raphael Washington
Wayne County Sherrif
Dan Ngoyi
Rock Connections
Debbie Kenyon
Audacy
David Femminineo
Femminineo Law
Jordan Field
The Detroit Tigers
Todd Bettison
City of Detroit
Franklin Hayes
Detroit Police Department
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 10/06/2023GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Contractors
Fiscal year endingProfessional fundraisers
Fiscal year endingSOURCE: IRS Form 990 Schedule G