Friends of the Children-Portland
EIN: 93-1098105
Programs and results
Reports and documents
Download annual reportsWhat we aim to solve
Our model is distinct, courageous and proven. We have redefined the youth mentoring field by creating the first and only long-term professional mentoring program in the country. Our Friends are experts in building sustained and nurturing relationships with youth. We specialize in working with youth who have faced a lot of adversity. We have the data to show that it's real and it works. Our model was founded on research showing that the single most important factor in overcoming childhood adversity is a long-term, nurturing relationship with a consistent and caring adult. Research over the past three decades continues to affirm how much these relationships matter. Our trauma-informed, long-term mentoring model is now being sought after by communities and systems around the country and the world. They recognize that children who've experienced a lot of adversity need more specialized and long-term mentoring relationships that Friends of the Children–Portland provides.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Professional Mentoring
Friends of the Children is an innovative program that fills the gap between what children deserve, and what life has dealt them. Our program alters the course of vulnerable children's lives by giving them something that every child needs - a stable, long-term relationship with an adult who believes in their ability to succeed. Friends serves over 400 youth, each of whom lives in difficult circumstances that severely threaten their chances of success. Our youth not only live with the daily struggles experienced in low-income households, but face additional challenges like the pain of watching a parent struggle with drug addiction, or the devastation of being physically or emotionally abused.
Friends of the Children provides these youth with paid, professional mentors whose only job is to ensure the wellbeing of the youth they are matched with. Youth spend an average of 16 hours per month with their Friends, working on academic skills, practicing hobbies, and doing fun activities in the community. The long-term nature of these Friend/child relationships allows our mentors to have a profound effect on the life of each child.
Where we work
Awards
Oregon's 3rd Most Admired Nonprofit 2012
Portland Business Journal
Purpose Prize - Founder, Duncan Campbell 2009
Civic Ventures
Orchid Award - Terri Sorensen, President 2012
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's Most Admired Nonprofit 2013
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's 2nd Most Admired Nonprofit 2014
Portland Business Journal
Torch Award for Ethics - Charity of the Year 2018
Better Business Bureau Northwest + Pacific
Impact Award 2016
Impact Entrepreneurs of Portland State University's School of Business Administration
Exceptional Mentoring Organization 2009
Oregon Mentors
Ethics in Business Award 2008
Oregon Ethics in Business
Light A Fire Award - Innovative Partnership 2012
Portland Monthly Magazine
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2015
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2016
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2017
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2018
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2019
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2020
Portland Business Journal
Oregon's #1 Most Admired Nonprofit 2021
Portland Business Journal
Affiliations & memberships
Social Impact Exchange's S&I 100 2015
External reviews

Photos
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of program participants who receive a secondary school diploma or GED
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Population(s) Served
Age groups, Social and economic status, Family relationships, Ethnic and racial groups
Related Program
Professional Mentoring
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Number of youth service participants who have involvement in juvenile justice system
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Decreasing
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Learn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
In 1993, Friends of the Children opened its doors with three friends serving 24 children. Today, Friends of the Children–Portland has 50 Friends guiding, supporting and mentoring almost 500 children across the Portland/Vancouver metropolitan area. Our mission is to impact generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors—12+ years, no matter what.
We meet this goal by identifying the children in our community who face the toughest circumstances and providing them with professional mentoring for 12 ½ years, from kindergarten through high school. Our mentors (called Friends) spend 16 hours/month with each child providing academic support, teaching life skills, setting short-term goals, modeling healthy behavior, nurturing interests and talents, and exposing them to new places and experiences. Our strategic objectives include clearly defined goals that correlate directly to our vision:
GOAL 1: Ensure Nurturing Sustained Relationships and Quality Programming
• Maintain Friends as a high quality program with validated outcomes measured over time--85% will graduate from high school or attain GED, 95% will avoid involvement in Juvenile Justice System, and 99% will avoid early parenting.
• Improve literacy for children as measured over time--show an increasing trend so that greater than 70% of our 3rd graders meet reading benchmarks.
• Improve post-secondary enrollment and completion over time--show an increasing trend so that greater than 50% enroll in a post-secondary program.
GOAL 2: Build Capacity and Capability
• Establish a visible presence in SE Portland by securing a facility that enhances service to youth and our program vision.
• Increase sustainable revenue streams (expected for three years or more) to support and grow the program.
• Hire and retain outstanding employees by developing a culture of leadership and by making FOTC the preferred place to work.
GOAL 3: Broaden Community Impact
• Scale the program--Increase the number of youth served to 475 by 2016.
• Increase FOTC brand recognition as one of the most innovative, effective, and respected mentoring organizations serving the most vulnerable children in Oregon and SW Washington.
• Increase impact through leveraging community partnerships that complement our core mission.
Our most recent community needs assessment found that over 27,000 Portland metro-area children live with multiple risk factors that qualify them for enrollment in the Friends program. In an effort to meet this tremendous need, a core goal of our current Strategic Plan is to expand our impact to serve 475 children by 2016 (currently over 400). In keeping with our mission to reach the most vulnerable youth, this expansion must focus primarily on the growing high-needs areas in East County.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Children who are served by Friends of the Children are enrolled each year during our selection process in May and June. The selection process is intensive and occurs over the course of six weeks within each of our partner schools-- Lincoln Park elementary schools in the David Douglas School District, Alder Elementary School in the Reynolds School District, Rigler School in the Portland Public School District, and King Elementary School in the Vancouver School District. Children are then are matched with their Friends over the summer.
Once a child has been selected, Friends of the Children makes a 12 ½-year commitment to provide intensive mentoring and support to that child. Our mentors spend about half of their dedicated time with their mentees in the classroom, assisting with school work and behavioral issues, as well as providing stability and general support for children.
One of our key strategies is our focus on education, which is the best way for low-income children to break generational cycles of poverty and make a better life for themselves. Yet low-income and minority children often face many systemic barriers to education such as poor performing neighborhood schools, parents with low educational attainment, substance abuse and/or violence in their homes and neighborhood, and disrupted schooling due to housing and family instability. They often face these challenges without the support of consistent adult role models in their lives. Friends of the Children exists to fill that void.
Our model brings together a unique blend of research and practical experience gained from our nearly two decades of work focusing on all areas of child and youth development. Friends' interactions with children are flexible and informal, but never random. Every school meeting, tutoring session, museum visit, and “hang out" session is informed by a set of evidence-based developmental milestones that guide our Friends in setting goals for each child they work with. Milestones include social and emotional development, decision-making skills, success in school, improved health and access to health care, and positive plan and skills for the future. Mentors engage children in decision-making activities, goal-setting, and rewards to help children work towards these milestones, while measuring their progress through our database management program.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
While other organizations in the community provide youth mentoring services, no other organization makes a commitment to exclusively serve the most vulnerable children with the same intensity and duration. We are active in the Oregon Mentors network and seek opportunities to work with other organizations who share our goals, but several important elements distinguish our model: we employ full-time, professional mentors who spend a great deal of time with children every week; we intervene early; and we commit for the long-term. Our program works because of several key elements that distinguish us from other mentoring organizations:
- Professional Mentors: Our Friends are highly trained and experienced in handling situations that many volunteer mentors would not be equipped to resolve. For the children we serve—who are some of the most vulnerable in the community—it is essential to have a mentor who is adept at handling emotional crises and navigating challenging situations that arise within children's families, their schools, and the social services system.
- Long-term Commitment: We make a 12 ½-year commitment to each of our children. We promise to show up for them, week after week, year after year, from kindergarten through high school. Friends often provide the only stable relationship in our children's lives, which are marked by changes in caregivers and frequent moves.
- Intensive Mentoring: Children spend 16 hours per month with their Friends, an average of four hours every week. This allows Friends to be integrated into all aspects of children's lives by spending time with them at home, in the classroom, and in the community.
Our innovative program model is based on extensive research into best practices for serving children most at risk for serious negative outcomes. This formative process determined that highly vulnerable children: 1) can be identified early based on research-proven risk factors; 2) must be supported by a caring, supportive adult relationship; and that 3) prevention must begin early, be sustained, and be holistic. Due to the long-term, intensive nature of our program, Friends are able to respond to each child on a highly individualized level, standing by them as they work to overcome challenges and achieve their goals.
Friends of the Children revenue is derived primarily from private contributions from our community. Approximately 43% of our revenue comes from special events. Roughly 28% of our funding comes from foundation and corporate grants; 15% from individual contributions; and 7% of our support comes from our endowment, which supports FOTC activities. Lastly, 7% of our revenue is from the Portland Children's Levy, our only source of public funding.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
Our innovative program model has a twenty year track record of successful outcomes. 83% of Friends of the Children graduates have earned a high school diploma or GED, though more than 60% have parents who did not graduate; 93% of our youth avoid the juvenile justice system, though 50% have at least one parent who has been incarcerated; 98% avoid early parenting, while 85% were born to a teen parent.
Based on our youth's achievements, analysts from the Harvard Business School Association of Oregon have calculated more than $7 in social return for every $1 invested in our program. Their analysis shows that children who qualify for Friends of the Children, but don't have access to a Friend, are 3 times more likely to drop out of high school or not obtain a GED, 5 times more likely to be incarcerated in the juvenile justice system, and 13 times more likely to become a teen parent.
Friends of the Children was recently named the number one Most Admired nonprofit in Oregon by the Portland Business Journal. The effectiveness of our model has also attracted national attention from groups seeking meaningful and sustainable solutions to pressing social problems. The Social Impact Exchange lists Friends of the Children on its S&I 100, a list of the top 100 high-impact nonprofits in America, chosen for their effective interventions and validated, evidence-based outcomes. We are also proud to have received a four star rating from Charity Navigator, reflecting our firm commitment to sustainability, accountability and transparency.
The need for intensive support of vulnerable children in our community continues to grow. A 2012 community needs assessment found that more than 27,000 metro area children (K-12) live with a level of risk similar to those enrolled in our program. Between 2001 and 2011 student enrollment increased 6% while the number of students in poverty rose 62%. Due to the drastic rise in the cost of living in north and northeast Portland, families who struggle financially are relocating to outer southeast Portland, where housing is more affordable.
FOTC is compelled to serve more highly vulnerable children. Our 5-year strategic plan outlines goals to serve 475 children by 2016 with a focus on geographic areas of greatest need. We have expanded child selection to David Douglas and Reynolds school districts in response to the concentration of poverty, diversity, and crime in outer SE Portland. We have already grown to serve over 400 youth currently. We aim to achieve growth while maintaining a high quality, effective and efficient program with validated outcomes. Ultimately, we seek to establish our program model as a best practice for working with children exposed to multiple risk factors. A rigorous evidence base, an important criterion for receipt of funding at state and federal levels, is needed to accomplish the vision of bringing our model to greater scale.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
Many of the youth we serve represent communities and cultures that have been historically marginalized and underserved. Approximately 78% identify as BIPOC.
-
How is your organization collecting feedback from the people you serve?
Electronic surveys (by email, tablet, etc.), Focus groups or interviews (by phone or in person), Community meetings/Town halls,
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals,
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
We have started Caregiver Advisory Boards that allow caregivers to come together and provide feedback and support for the FriendsPDX community. We have an English-speaking board and a Spanish-speaking board.
-
With whom is the organization sharing feedback?
Our staff,
-
How has asking for feedback from the people you serve changed your relationship?
Improved our relationship with caregivers.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded,
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
It is difficult to get the people we serve to respond to requests for feedback,
Financials
Financial documents
Download audited financialsRevenue vs. expenses: breakdown
Liquidity in 2020 info
1.16
Months of cash in 2020 info
5.2
Fringe rate in 2020 info
21%
Funding sources info
Assets & liabilities info
Friends of the Children-Portland
Revenue & expensesFiscal Year: Sep 01 - Aug 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
Friends of the Children-Portland
Balance sheetFiscal Year: Sep 01 - Aug 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
The balance sheet gives a snapshot of the financial health of an organization at a particular point in time. An organization's total assets should generally exceed its total liabilities, or it cannot survive long, but the types of assets and liabilities must also be considered. For instance, an organization's current assets (cash, receivables, securities, etc.) should be sufficient to cover its current liabilities (payables, deferred revenue, current year loan, and note payments). Otherwise, the organization may face solvency problems. On the other hand, an organization whose cash and equivalents greatly exceed its current liabilities might not be putting its money to best use.
Fiscal Year: Sep 01 - Aug 31
SOURCE: IRS Form 990
This snapshot of Friends of the Children-Portland’s financial trends applies Nonprofit Finance Fund® analysis to data hosted by GuideStar. While it highlights the data that matter most, remember that context is key – numbers only tell part of any story.
Created in partnership with
Business model indicators
Profitability info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) before depreciation | $3,966,770 | $714,600 | $218,983 | $199,813 | -$339,030 |
As % of expenses | 74.8% | 12.6% | 3.5% | 3.1% | -4.9% |
Unrestricted surplus (deficit) after depreciation | $3,809,762 | $541,607 | $52,751 | $20,849 | -$540,000 |
As % of expenses | 69.7% | 9.3% | 0.8% | 0.3% | -7.6% |
Revenue composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue (unrestricted & restricted) | $5,310,778 | $6,113,526 | $6,647,487 | $7,580,153 | $5,871,237 |
Total revenue, % change over prior year | -22.7% | 15.1% | 8.7% | 14.0% | -22.5% |
Program services revenue | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Membership dues | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Investment income | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Government grants | 13.8% | 12.8% | 11.7% | 9.8% | 12.1% |
All other grants and contributions | 85.9% | 86.9% | 88.1% | 89.8% | 86.7% |
Other revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% |
Expense composition info | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses before depreciation | $5,305,674 | $5,668,325 | $6,193,699 | $6,447,999 | $6,937,728 |
Total expenses, % change over prior year | 7.3% | 6.8% | 9.3% | 4.1% | 7.6% |
Personnel | 74.1% | 77.2% | 75.9% | 76.2% | 79.6% |
Professional fees | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Occupancy | 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Interest | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Pass-through | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.8% | 3.4% | 3.6% |
All other expenses | 20.0% | 15.5% | 15.6% | 17.0% | 13.3% |
Full cost components (estimated) info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses (after depreciation) | $5,462,682 | $5,841,318 | $6,359,931 | $6,626,963 | $7,138,698 |
One month of savings | $442,140 | $472,360 | $516,142 | $537,333 | $578,144 |
Debt principal payment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Fixed asset additions | $1,179,033 | $0 | $0 | $361,603 | $0 |
Total full costs (estimated) | $7,083,855 | $6,313,678 | $6,876,073 | $7,525,899 | $7,716,842 |
Capital structure indicators
Liquidity info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months of cash | 3.3 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 5.2 |
Months of cash and investments | 3.3 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 5.2 |
Months of estimated liquid unrestricted net assets | 3.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Balance sheet composition info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $1,439,278 | $2,107,757 | $2,553,479 | $2,084,755 | $3,014,657 |
Investments | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Receivables | $1,085,532 | $827,676 | $650,872 | $1,674,655 | $1,472,269 |
Gross land, buildings, equipment (LBE) | $4,120,965 | $4,192,000 | $4,333,953 | $4,695,557 | $4,596,396 |
Accumulated depreciation (as a % of LBE) | 10.9% | 14.8% | 18.2% | 20.6% | 21.1% |
Liabilities (as a % of assets) | 7.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | 3.3% | 32.4% |
Unrestricted net assets | $5,027,466 | $5,569,073 | $5,621,824 | $5,642,673 | $5,102,673 |
Temporarily restricted net assets | $823,629 | $553,543 | $791,557 | $1,724,225 | N/A |
Permanently restricted net assets | $43,524 | $47,524 | $49,274 | $51,024 | N/A |
Total restricted net assets | $867,153 | $601,067 | $840,831 | $1,775,249 | $528,045 |
Total net assets | $5,894,619 | $6,170,140 | $6,462,655 | $7,417,922 | $5,630,718 |
Key data checks
Key data checks info | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Material data errors | No | No | No | No | No |
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Documents
Executive Director
Traci Rossi
Traci Rossi has built relationships with community leaders, philanthropists, and corporate leaders to sustain, diversify and grow Friends of the Children—Portland's impact. Her efforts have been recognized by Portland Business Journal as a “Woman of Influence” and as a Hometown Hero by the Portland Trail Blazers for her service-before-self mentality and significant positive impact on the Portland community.
Rossi's greatest passion in life has always revolved around helping communities and individuals thrive. She has over 20 years of nonprofit leadership experience emphasizing education, community outreach, and service to girls, women, children, and families. She has a breadth of experience working in direct service roles to the very top of leadership collaborating with others to build a better future for those in our care. Rossi is an inclusive leader and has made it her goal to create and execute a vision and elevate others to leadership positions.
Number of employees
Source: IRS Form 990
Friends of the Children-Portland
Officers, directors, trustees, and key employeesSOURCE: IRS Form 990
Compensation data
There are no highest paid employees recorded for this organization.
Friends of the Children-Portland
Board of directorsas of 07/11/2022
Board of directors data
Maddie Andrews
Community Leader
Cynthia Campbell
Founder
Duncan Campbell
Founder
Jeanne Bailey
Standard Insurance
Krishna Balasubramani
Sather, Byerly & Holloway LLP
Christopher S. Brisbee
USI Insurance Services
Ryan Buchanan
Thesis Agency
Lisa Farjado Faust
Pacific West Bank
Bertha Ferran
Community Partner
Lana Finley
CLF Family Foundation
Steve Fogg
Marquis Companies
Pleschette Fontenet
Lenovo
Bill Gardner
Morley Financial Services, Inc.
Allyson Harris
Community Leader
Jon Huddleston
NW Natural
Jessica Johnston
Nike
Jay Jones
Data Abstract Solutions
Jenna Mooney
Davis Wright Tremaine
John Nolting
KeyBank
Jeff Nudelman
Schnitzer Properties
Andrew Over
Regence BlueCross BlueShield
John Phillips
Grand + Benedicts
Lou Radja
Lou Radja Enterprises
Judith Ramaley
Portland State University
Laura Rosenbaum
Stoel Rives
Bruce Schoen
Community Leader
Matt Swaim
Ripple NW
Felicia Tripp Folsom
Empowering Leaders Division of The Contingent
Karen Vineyard
Bank of America
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Not applicable -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 03/31/2021GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
Professional fundraisers
Fiscal year endingSOURCE: IRS Form 990 Schedule G